(needless to say I'm not regretting my decision to not buy dapgo)
edit: this is such an awful top-of-the-page post I'm so sorry
Sugar free Ribena is foul.Philena wrote:dizzy! You are amazing! Thanks so much for adding the links!!!
As far as the sugar free Ribena, Phil mentioned in one of his live shows that he/they were trying to drink sugar free Coke and Ribena to be more healthy. I wish I could remember when... maybe summer of 2015?!
mez29 wrote: What used to be 9 pm is now 8 pm, so the ls is an hour later now for you.
Thank you both for answering. I guess it will really be 5 am my time as it's 4 now and there's no LS yet.flarequake wrote: The clocks went back an hour here so it should be 3am for you now.
I'm going fucking mental what is it with the thursdays???anathema wrote: dapgo spoiler:
That is disgustingly adorable why do they do this to meanathema wrote:dapgo spoiler:I'm honestly rolling my eyes like is the whole book gonna be this fanservicey or-
(needless to say I'm not regretting my decision to not buy dapgo)
edit: this is such an awful top-of-the-page post I'm so sorry
Ordered from their EU site, there didn't seem to be any options closer to home. Ha, thanks, but I need help with literally everything so don't worry!gnostic wrote:Hi, I am a native Russian speaker, I can help you with anything you want and PM you about some uncertainties in your post. Would you like that?
Also, are you in Russia? O_O why would you order from ozon?
shame haha, oh dear, thankscoffeepenguin wrote:mez29, it's sensations plural and the publishing company is AST, what you wrote is a word for "publishing company", actually
[offtopic]Some friends of mine got married last weekend and these are legitimate grown ass professional respectable adults in their 30s and when they exchanged vows they both responded with "YEAH-YA!"[/offtopic]mio wrote:[offtopic]This post on tumblr just made me crack up
[/offtopic]
I'm going fucking mental what is it with the thursdays???anathema wrote: dapgo spoiler:
My gf is on fire today, according to her it looks like "awkward medieval newlyweds staring at their relatives who are expecting them to consummate their marriage" and I can't disagreeanathema wrote:dapgo spoiler:I'm honestly rolling my eyes like is the whole book gonna be this fanservicey or-
(needless to say I'm not regretting my decision to not buy dapgo)
edit: this is such an awful top-of-the-page post I'm so sorry
anathema wrote:dapgo spoiler:I'm honestly rolling my eyes like is the whole book gonna be this fanservicey or-
(needless to say I'm not regretting my decision to not buy dapgo)
edit: this is such an awful top-of-the-page post I'm so sorry
I have a theory that Thursday is D&P's day off. I remember that Phil was telling in the liveshow that if you work for yourself/youtuber/work from home you need to have permanent days off every week like if you worked 5 days a week. I remember Tuesday being off day for Phil, couldn't remember second day, it was a couple years ago.mio wrote:
I'm going fucking mental what is it with the thursdays???
Youtubers and traditional celebrities are widely treated the same, yet not much different. You agree there.melon lord wrote:I feel that way about anyone, regardless of their job. Also about straight couples, it shouldn't make a difference if they are straight or not.eevee wrote:I have so much to say. Not just at you, melon lord, but also Skeletorsrighthand and everyone else who agreed with either of you.
- Do you feel the same way about traditional celebrities? Is shipping them wrong? For example, singers or actors?
- What about shipping straight couples? Was shipping zalfie wrong before it was confirmed canon? What about after? How about Brangelina?
You agreemelon lord wrote:I don't see a difference either. It's none of my business if they are a tiny channel with 50 subs or 50 million, or a multi-billionaire celebrity. Are they a person?eevee wrote:What you're saying is, if you boil it down to just the bones, is it's wrong to treat celebrities like they're not human, but rather characters. I'm going to draw a lot of parallels between how we treat Youtubers and how fans treat traditional celebrities because I don't see a huge difference.
melon lord wrote:I don't agree with paparazzi either. Or stalking. Paparazzi and what they do is basically a form of stalking, that is, intense following of a person over an extended period of time, to an invasive degree.eevee wrote:By your logic, the paparazzi is immoral. You mentioned "stalking." Does the paparazzi stalk celebrities when they follow them and take pictures of them? Is that wrong? If it's so wrong, why is it legal?
melon lord wrote: Your feelings, whether positive or negative, give no person the right to impose them on to another human being.
melon lord wrote:Yeah, I dislike sexualisation and I detest the business of selling bodies, either in a seemingly innocent fashion like music and Hollywood, to porn and dirty magazines.eevee wrote:By your logic, sexualizing celebrities is immoral. "look[ing] at [them] like [they] are two pieces of meat." So every magazine, poster, advertisement, movie, song, performance that relates celebrities in any way to sex, whether it be lyrics, provocative dress, provocative poses, whatever, is immoral. I'd hate to break that to the advertising industry...and the pop music industry, and Hollywood...
So we agree there. Yet...melon lord wrote:Shipping is a very large grey area...So what part of shipping are you referring to? Because one is infinitely more harmful than the other.eevee wrote:And finally, by your logic it is immoral to "ship" real people.
Shipping is discussing the possibility of or logistics of a possible relationship
I explained to you that I wasn't talking about the people who put it in Dan and Phil's face or otherwise show it to them. Yet you decided to somewhat ignore that. And then you argued that there's really no way not to keep it from Dan and Phil. So by your own logic, there's one way to ship, and that involves exposing the real people to it. Okay. So you don't care if the shipper in question personally attempts to contact Dan and Phil or not. Every shipper is part of the problem, regardless of personal action.melon lord wrote:Also I'd say that, respectfully, you're wrong about the 99%.
And further phandom insults.melon lord wrote:But a lot of the phandom are young and have not gotten to that point of thinking yet. They think it's okay and funny to do a lot of things that you just don't.
Ayy, have fun!Cora wrote:Speaking of DAPGOOSE, it took 2 weeks, but the LA even finally sold out.
I will be there. Lurking. Creeping. Probably drinking.
That page doesn't show Dan's ("Dan's") bunk though? In the photos of him sleeping, he's on the couch. (Unless you're talking about a different photo and I'm just blind, lol)Maya wrote: DAPGO spoilerDan and his tiny bunk
I'm wonder if they mentioned it in other pages too.
eevee wrote:anathema wrote:dapgo spoiler:
He is! But omg younow is laggymio wrote:Dan is live!
I'm not sure why you're feeling so defensive. This is like #NotAllMen mentality. If you feel that what I discuss doesn't apply to you then it doesn't. And if you can't see the problems I have with certain aspects of shipping real people then I'm sorry, but I've tried my best to honestly explain my own personal issue with it. I'm not the government, I'm not gonna ban the world from doing it. I'm just saying I dislike it when it reaches a certain threshold and I also explained to the OP why it's considered more icky than fictional shipping. And keep in mind this opinion is not just shared by me, it's not something I pulled out of my own ass, it's an opinion that does float around the internet.eevee wrote:
So we agree there. Yet...
I explained to you that I wasn't talking about the people who put it in Dan and Phil's face or otherwise show it to them. Yet you decided to somewhat ignore that. And then you argued that there's really no way not to keep it from Dan and Phil. So by your own logic, there's one way to ship, and that involves exposing the real people to it. Okay. So you don't care if the shipper in question personally attempts to contact Dan and Phil or not. Every shipper is part of the problem, regardless of personal action.melon lord wrote:Also I'd say that, respectfully, you're wrong about the 99%.
Yet somehow, RPF is okay to you, even sexual RPF. All right.
And further phandom insults.melon lord wrote:But a lot of the phandom are young and have not gotten to that point of thinking yet. They think it's okay and funny to do a lot of things that you just don't.
So take everything I just quoted. I think it's pretty clear that you do not like or agree with basically every aspect of fandom culture. How celebrities are treated by their fans. Also, you seem to have a negative opinion of the phandom as a whole.
So why are you on a forum about Youtube celebrity gossip? Wouldn't it make more sense to not participate in a fandom, if you hate fandom culture so much? So much to think it's immoral?