Levitating wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:44 am
shan wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:12 am. There have been plenty of other points made both in this conversation as well as in previous conversations that don't involve the house. People thought they were together before they ever moved into their first flat in Manchester.
Can I ask you which ones? I am not sure I see them ;_; If it's about Dan saying how he stopped interactions because he did not have some things to offer, then that opens the conversation between whom to believe: Dan there or Dan when he tweets/says certain things? Which then leads to see the separation between real Dan (who offers only friendship) and persona Dan (who carter his tweets/jokes to a public that's different from us). And still there's this thing of him being
sincere through jokes as throughout these years about his depression.
People thinking they are a couple is a separate thing from them actually being together in a 'traditional' relationship.
I also put modern between quotes because it is a strange definition, but one we have used to differentiate it from old patriarch values (one where you are suppose to not exists as a social being outside of the relationship).
I'm someone who tends to go back to the text, and in the case of Dan, the master text is of course BIG.
Dan's own words on his relationship with Phil [at 22:15]:
This was when, through the magic of the internet, I met Phil.
Obviously, we were more than friends, but it was more than just romantic. This is someone that genuinely liked me. I trusted them, and for the first time since I was a tiny child, I actually felt safe.
The relationship that we formed, at that point, was something that I needed in my life. We are real best friends. Companions through life. Like, actual soulmates. (Not that souls are a real thing that exists.)
It’s so lucky to just find someone that you can be that compatible with. Especially to anyone that has experienced the kind of self hatred that I have dealt with. One person accepting you can make all the difference.
I bet so many people want to know so much more about that, which honestly, I take as a compliment. But here’s the thing; I’m somebody that wants to keep the details of my personal life private. So is Phil.
As for Dan's thirsty/sexual tweets, I think he just wants attention, not a hookup. As others have said, these days he specificly wants attention for the fact that he is a sexual being who likes sex with men. Dan is an internet persona, so representing himself on social media is his job, and this is what he wants to represent. When Dan says [BIG 28:54] (definitely worth watching this one for the nonverbal nuance):
Well, it’s always been on my mind that I need to talk about this at some point. I couldn’t just keep going forward in my life ignoring it, not only just so I can be authentic, which is very important for general existing, but also just letting people know what kind of sexual attention I want from the world. All of it. From everyone. God, I’m so thirsty!
it sounds to me that the truth buried in the joke is wanting attention, not wanting sex. In the context of a video about being gay, it doesn't really make sense to state you want every kind of sexual attention from every kind of person. But wanting "everyone" to pay attention to you and what you're saying--sure.
( also, once again: lovely to be able to have these conversation with this respectful atmosphere where things are understood not to be personal!
)
As a long-time forum member, I appreciate
your contributions to the conversation and the atmosphere!