I agree with all of that. I do think some of the issues people are angry about have been addressed (people were upset Dan only showed up to promote merch, so Dan established clearly and communicated directly to us that he wouldn't be doing merch - problem solved, he won't be only appearing to promote things) but I think the anger is lingering even after the situation has been resolved and that colors everything else, which aligns with what you're saying about boundaries crossed. I know there are other issues that they could communicate more on. I just think they're probably aware of how badly their attempts to communicate always go and are wary that anything they say would just add fuel to the fire.Katka wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 6:20 pmI agree with this (and your overall point in your last post), don't get me wrong, but he's not just doing this for himself, he's also doing it to himself. And while Dan and Phil are obviously allowed to set boundaries and don't have to react the way we want them to... that's also true for us. We have boundaries as supporters too and I think a lot of us feel like those have been overstepped recently. And we obviously also don't have to react the way they want us to. So in the end I don't really know where this leaves us and them as viewers/creators but also customers/a business in the long run.alittledizzy wrote:I think for me, the idea of it is less punishment and more boundaries. If it were the reason, since this is pure speculation, I'd look at it less from the perspective of 'he's doing this to us' and more 'he's doing this for himself.'
And to be honest? I think it might. Because they're bad at this. In a way that I don't think it's easy to just look at and go 'well we did it wrong last time, lets do it different now' and fix. They try things and somehow always try the wrong thing. Like: I think Phil genuinely thought that because people were asking nonstop about a mukbang that giving an answer was the best move. Most of us could have told him it wasn't a good idea to say that how and when he did. And it wasn't, unless he was prepared to sit down and have a heart to heart on why we weren't getting it, preferably with Dan also there. But I don't think they're ever gonna be comfortable doing that. I think I've just conditioned myself to believe that them communicating things we don't want to hear will only ever upset people and it wouldn't shock me if they felt the same way and that's why Phil tried alone and Dan, after realizing his tumblr post about the merch didn't make anyone less angry, sat it out this time.