pearshaped34 wrote:
He also wrote this
http://teneightymagazine.com/2015/04/21 ... haracters/
And while it's hardly an article meant to be taken seriously I kind of feel like he was throwing some shade at both Dan and Phil there. Mostly Phil actually.
Although out of the two of them Dan is the only one he unfollowed on twitter and started following some kind of parody account of him.
Am I the only one not truly seeing the phil shade here?, i kinda saw that in the dan one with the whole:
Dan has risen to great heights playing the game
(playing the game? sound like he is saying playing his fans, or playing a part or people in general, idk sounds salty either way.)
and
And we’re not saying he could arrange his enemies to be burned alive, but well, “The night is dark and full of phans”.
(legit getting charlie situation vibes here)
But on the phil one, idk it just seemed he was saying that phil was too loyal and not appreciated more:
He’s been here since the start and watched his brothers-in-arms, friends and even people he didn’t like too much, rise to the top without a second thought to him and how he has helped them.
, so yeah
Edit to add: (maybe its because of the
"But through his alignment with Dan he is now making strides to greatness. " part?? that seemed kinda shady but after reading the following part:
"Phil is making his mark known, conquering the YouTube game and emerging as one of our only hopes for a peaceful community" it didnt feel like it was meant to be bad? idk)
Also, yeah he is only following phil on twitter, it really surprises me how a lot of ex-phil friends kinda have a vendetta on dan but not for phil (im talking about the matt thing btw), i mean if my friend "left" me for another new friend i would be madder at my friend more than the other person. Thoughts=?
