
credit to danhowellgifs

credit to danhowellgifs



I consider it already confirmed. I think Dan's intention with the video was also to make it clear that he and Phil are together and want to keep their private life private. I genuinely don't think he thought people would selectively ignore that the entire video was in past tense to only isolate and draw conclusions from the sentences about Phil being in past tense or that people would, in light of the announcement of his sexuality, suddenly decide that jokes Dan has always made must Mean More.eevee wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:54 pmspeaking of their relationship when do you think they'll confirm that to us? we didn't think phil was making a video and here we are. i have confidence at this point that they will confirm it to us. i think they just are taking a little more time first. knowing them, we could be waiting a while. but i think the day will come.
He said more than just romantic, which to me read very clearly as saying that not only are they in a romantic relationship but they are also best friends and I think they take a lot of pride in the fact that they are companions in every facet of life. Not every romantic relationship is also a 'best friend' situation - some people come into romantic relationships already having platonic support and a circle of people that fill a lot of those needs. For Dan and Phil, they fill every need for each other, and it just makes me feel very fond of them that they value being best friends on the same level or higher than being romantic partners.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:57 pm I answer here to what @ablissa posted as the last post in the previous thread.
Daniel said at the end of that coming out vid that "cute mutuals slide in the DMs". I think mutuals in this case means fellow gays. He also said that what he had with Phil was "more than romantic", and I'm struggling to figure out what that means. Is platonic more than romantic to him? He was talking in the past tense about it... I don't want to burst any phan bubbles, but maybe my perspective as a gay guy should be heard here.
i think if you wanna thirst after dan then you’re allowed to do that, but i don’t think many people are going to agree with you that he has room in his heart for a guy who isn’t phil. they live together, they spend holidays together, they vacation together, dan called phil his soulmate and companion through life, his literal other half... i think it’s pretty clear that dan is committed to phil and not looking for anything beyond thatGalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:57 pm I answer here to what @ablissa posted as the last post in the previous thread.
Daniel said at the end of that coming out vid that "cute mutuals slide in the DMs". I think mutuals in this case means fellow gays. He also said that what he had with Phil was "more than romantic", and I'm struggling to figure out what that means. Is platonic more than romantic to him? He was talking in the past tense about it... I don't want to burst any phan bubbles, but maybe my perspective as a gay guy should be heard here.
We've already discussed this in-depth (ha) right after the video came out - have you read through that already? it starts around here: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1686&start=925GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:57 pm I answer here to what @ablissa posted as the last post in the previous thread.
Daniel said at the end of that coming out vid that "cute mutuals slide in the DMs". I think mutuals in this case means fellow gays. He also said that what he had with Phil was "more than romantic", and I'm struggling to figure out what that means. Is platonic more than romantic to him? He was talking in the past tense about it... I don't want to burst any phan bubbles, but maybe my perspective as a gay guy should be heard here.
Eh. Dan should know how we are. And I'm still clinging to his video description - I think he made it clear that he'll tell us more. That's just my interpretation of italittledizzy wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:58 pm I consider it already confirmed. I think Dan's intention with the video was also to make it clear that he and Phil are together and want to keep their private life private. I genuinely don't think he thought people would selectively ignore that the entire video was in past tense to only isolate and draw conclusions from the sentences about Phil being in past tense or that people would, in light of the announcement of his sexuality, suddenly decide that jokes Dan has always made must Mean More.
I think things will feel 'confirmed' to people as Dan and Phil continue living their lives together and making it very obvious that they are, to quote Dan, companions through life. If some people stubbornly refuse to believe that counts as a relationship unless they're willing to be explicit about things then that's gonna be frustrating but I don't think Dan and Phil are gonna view it as a problem they need to handle.

I made a lengthy post about this when we first had this discussion, so I'm just going to link it here instead of re-writing what I still stand by. viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1692&p=107988#p107988GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:57 pm I answer here to what @ablissa posted as the last post in the previous thread.
Daniel said at the end of that coming out vid that "cute mutuals slide in the DMs". I think mutuals in this case means fellow gays. He also said that what he had with Phil was "more than romantic", and I'm struggling to figure out what that means. Is platonic more than romantic to him? He was talking in the past tense about it... I don't want to burst any phan bubbles, but maybe my perspective as a gay guy should be heard here.
Dan does know how we are, but also he doesn't owe us anything. He said in his video "I'm sure a lot of you want to know more about that, which I take as a compliment, but I'm a person who likes to keep their private life private. So is Phil."eevee wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:03 pm Eh. Dan should know how we are. And I'm still clinging to his video description - I think he made it clear that he'll tell us more. That's just my interpretation of it![]()
you don’t know that they don’t share the bedroom. they don’t do PDA because they were closeted and in dan’s own words are both private people. the cute mutuals comment was a joke, the kind he makes all the time.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:09 pm @alittledizzy, if they were a couple, wouldn't they share the bedroom? If Dan was taken, why would he ask for cute mutuals to slide in his DMs? They have never kissed on or held hands. I'm not an anti, rather someone who is an outsider and is trying to look at this from a different perspective.
They have never kissed or held hands in front of an audience. They do live together they can do that in private. Phil's stuff was seen in Dan's bedroom in the last live show where we saw his room and Phil basically confirmed the AP room was a set.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:09 pm @alittledizzy, if they were a couple, wouldn't they share the bedroom? If Dan was taken, why would he ask for cute mutuals to slide in his DMs? They have never kissed on or held hands. I'm not an anti, rather someone who is an outsider and is trying to look at this from a different perspective.

Neither of them were out, which is a perfectly reasonable explanation to me as to why they've not put their relationship on display.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:09 pm @alittledizzy, if they were a couple, wouldn't they share the bedroom? If Dan was taken, why would he ask for cute mutuals to slide in his DMs? They have never kissed on or held hands. I'm not an anti, rather someone who is an outsider and is trying to look at this from a different perspective.
Not dizzy but I'm just trying to clarify- are you saying that you won't believe that they're a romantic couple unless they perform on camera for you? That can't be what you mean, right?GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:09 pm @alittledizzy, if they were a couple, wouldn't they share the bedroom? If Dan was taken, why would he ask for cute mutuals to slide in his DMs? They have never kissed on or held hands. I'm not an anti, rather someone who is an outsider and is trying to look at this from a different perspective.
Mutuals are the people who you are following on twitter who are also following you back. You can't DM someone on twitter unless you're mutuals. (Apologies if you already knew that, I wasn't sure.)GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:57 pm I answer here to what @ablissa posted as the last post in the previous thread.
Daniel said at the end of that coming out vid that "cute mutuals slide in the DMs". I think mutuals in this case means fellow gays. He also said that what he had with Phil was "more than romantic", and I'm struggling to figure out what that means. Is platonic more than romantic to him? He was talking in the past tense about it... I don't want to burst any phan bubbles, but maybe my perspective as a gay guy should be heard here.
Well, not if they wish to be private about it, which seems to be the case here... If they were more candid about the rs then maybe it could be expected that they held hands on camera or something.CapriciousCrab wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:13 pm Not dizzy but I'm just trying to clarify- are you saying that you won't believe that they're a romantic couple unless they perform on camera for you? That can't be what you mean, right?
This, oh my god so much this.waveydnp wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:12 pm you don’t know that they don’t share the bedroom. they don’t do PDA because they were closeted and in dan’s own words are both private people. the cute mutuals comment was a joke, the kind he makes all the time.
imo the perspective you’re looking for is one that ignores all the actual facts.
I'm so tired of the whole conversation really.jestbee wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:10 pm On a personal note, I don't really understand why this is still a conversation in this way, when if they were a straight couple then it wouldn't be, Dan saying they were soulmates and companions through life - Present tense - Would be enough.

I think since Dan was coming out of a three* year relationship with someone that did not make him feel safe and that he did not trust and seemed to imply did not always like him (since he referred to himself as a bad boyfriend) being with Phil in a healthier more mutual relationship probably did feel like a revelation.knq wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:15 pm22:14 "And this is when, through the magic of the internet, I met Phil. And obviously we were more than friends but it was more than just romantic. This is someone that genuinely liked me. I trusted them. And for the first time since I was a tiny child, I actually felt safe."
Seeing that quoted, I wonder if a more crude but more accurate phrasing would have been "more than just sexual." Because I can see having a sexual relationship with someone who doesn't "genuinely like" you or who you don't trust, but those things sort of seem embedded in the concept of romance to me. Maybe not to Dan though.
Sorry for doubleposting but like, they were closeted, why would they hold hands?GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:19 pmWell, not if they wish to be private about it, which seems to be the case here... If they were more candid about the rs then maybe it could be expected that they held hands on camera or something.CapriciousCrab wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:13 pm Not dizzy but I'm just trying to clarify- are you saying that you won't believe that they're a romantic couple unless they perform on camera for you? That can't be what you mean, right?
They do share a bed. I'm trying to find that screenshot where Dan goes into Phil's room and he's in one side of the bed, the other side clearly recently inhabited - pillow messed up, a deadass sheet crease down the middle of the bed, and the blanket pushed aside diagonally as if someone got out on the other side. Anyone have that handy? I can't find it.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:09 pm @alittledizzy, if they were a couple, wouldn't they share the bedroom? If Dan was taken, why would he ask for cute mutuals to slide in his DMs? They have never kissed on or held hands. I'm not an anti, rather someone who is an outsider and is trying to look at this from a different perspective.

Hey. So to answer you question No I don’t see much chance of dnp not being in a relationship. Not at this point in time anyway after both these videos I don’t really think many people are of the opinion of them being these two single bachelors. 2 years ago when I made my account I was someone probably called a anti which I wasn’t a anti, I was never against the Idea of them being together and I never had a problem with people believing they were. At that point I didn’t think I knew enough to think they were still together which I did believe they were from the start.GalaxyDarling wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:15 pm I just registered after lurking since Dan came out. I'm a gay guy myself. I find Dan mighty handsome
.
I'd like to ask you all is it feasible that Dan and Phil are not boyfriends? It seems like Dan might be looking for a boyfriend, or at least open for that idea? Phil is more of a question mark, though he seems more lowkey about it anyway. Not that I could have Dan, lol, but I'm wondering if there is room for another guy in his heart?