Nearly spat out my water.Lurktacularr wrote:Even though I would cream my pants over Phil wearing a long chain, regardless of what was on the end of it.
Same, though. 
Phil the ladies man is at it againPolarFox wrote: Still on playlist, still with flipside, it seems.
Also love to see a return of Phoug 
Keep an eye on Doug's second channel, he daily vlog Playlist so we may get to see at least 1 Playlist vlog 
Excuse me, but i see this sometimes and get defensive, because how do friends behave? Or should i say how are friends SUPPOSED to behave? Every relationship is different (and by relationship i don't neccessarily mean romantic) and unless they make out in public or say publicly that they are a couple, their behaviour says nothing about the nature of their relationship. Hell, i've had friends who i've held hands with and partners i hardly ever touched in public.fakelights wrote:People will still speculate and doubt you, even more if you make this kind of statement. If you are only friends, act like friends! If more and don't want others to know, don't say anything. It's just worse if you do argh.
Phil bringing his pillow feel #relatable to me because I did the same when I go on vacation. There is always a pillow that I bring so I can have a little piece of home with me. 
Jesus Christ. Really Tyler? No words.alittledizzy wrote:Okay, Tyler...
edit: okay wow he already deleted it, but it was definitely a real reblog so I'm going to leave the link even though it's broken now.
I don't think I've expressed myself in the right way, I'm sorry. That's not what I meant. The only thing I had in mind was that they over-do the 'we are just friends' thing when it's not necessary. I absolutely don't think there is a right way to behave as friends or whatever, just that they don't seem to be natural about it. I tried to summarise my annoyance and it came out wrong.wtfamidoinghere wrote:Excuse me, but i see this sometimes and get defensive, because how do friends behave? Or should i say how are friends SUPPOSED to behave? Every relationship is different (and by relationship i don't neccessarily mean romantic) and unless they make out in public or say publicly that they are a couple, their behaviour says nothing about the nature of their relationship. Hell, i've had friends who i've held hands with and partners i hardly ever touched in public.fakelights wrote:People will still speculate and doubt you, even more if you make this kind of statement. If you are only friends, act like friends! If more and don't want others to know, don't say anything. It's just worse if you do argh.
And most importantly: It is not their job to portray their relationship so that nobody gets the wrong idea. They have said often that phan isn't real. That we don't believe it (most of us) and speculate is fine, but it's not their problem IMO.
And how is their merch even couple-y? Are they standing too close together? They both had to be on the shirt, logically, would it have been ok if they were printed on the opposite sides? I don't get how that would be seen as misleading. Same with the japhan anniversary. I wouldn't call that a couple thing. So i guess my point is that "couple-y" behaviour is a subjective term.
Obviously all of you have a right to your opinion and if this is how you perceive them then that's fine, but i just want to point out that just because you perceive something as couple behaviour doesn't mean it actually is.
This ties into the shipbaiting debate. Unless we assume they play up their relationship (and most of us agree that they are probably more touchy in private, because they used to be when there weren't so many people watching) i don't have a problem.
To the fake tweets:
Frankly, i don't care how much they lie to hide their relationship or to seem more platonic to the public. It's their right to hide.
I'd only mind if they were lying to hide that they are bad people
That's the way I read it -- sneaky serious innuendoPolarFox wrote:Why was my first thought on this twitter exchange that they are gonna end up watching Buffy lying next to each other and then fighting over the bed? (like you know, trying to get the other down from it... And ending up sleeping there both because they are both too stubborn to give up?)iero wrote:
now im looking at the tour bus layouts again
And oh jesus, now I read it again and the "you're going down Danny" sounds sooo inappropriate
Ummm would it not have been better to NOT put a period before the person's name? Now he's making sure that EVERYBODY on his timeline sees that (and therefore the original post). Good to know it was an accident but don't call more attention to it. Ugh.rizzo wrote:
Followed up by this:
iiiiiiinteresting.
Yeah alright, how the heck would you accidentally reblog that? I think you can only post straight to your dash by alt+click, otherwise the thing with options and stuff pops up and you'd see what you're reblogging.rizzo wrote: Followed up by this:
iiiiiiinteresting.
Umm guys, why can't I see anything on the followed up? Is it deleted? Does anyone have screenshot?rizzo wrote:Followed up by this:alittledizzy wrote:Okay, Tyler...
(link)
edit: okay wow he already deleted it, but it was definitely a real reblog so I'm going to leave the link even though it's broken now.
iiiiiiinteresting.
I edited into my post above.swofro wrote: Umm guys, why can't I see anything on the followed up? Is it deleted? Does anyone have screenshot?
Lol did someone snapchat/ tweet about this?sweetmm wrote:The ride Cat & are on just stop; I think the lesson here is never share the same ride as if you don't want a stalled ride
Thanks! Wow, he is backpedalling so hard. He should've deleted the reblog and left it at that, I guess. Acknowledging it probably going to make things worse, but not acknowledging it probably(?) gonna make angry if he knows the truth and accidentally outed them (given phan is real, of course)fancybum wrote:I edited into my post above.swofro wrote: Umm guys, why can't I see anything on the followed up? Is it deleted? Does anyone have screenshot?
edit: and also what alittledizzy referenced (which has also now been deleted)He deleted all mentions of it now.
Yes, agree. Wether they are together or not, their attempts to look platonic (or what society expects platonic friends to look like) often look a bit unnatural to me, too.fakelights wrote: I don't think I've expressed myself in the right way, I'm sorry. That's not what I meant. The only thing I had in mind was that they over-do the 'we are just friends' thing when it's not necessary. I absolutely don't think there is a right way to behave as friends or whatever, just that they don't seem to be natural about it. I tried to summarise my annoyance and it came out wrong.
And yes, they have every right to lie about their personal lives. I truly don't care much about it and don't always expect the (whole) truth from them. It just bothers me sometimes how they get out of their way to explain things, which I think they shouldn't need to. They don't need to explain every step they take etc.
On Cat's snapchat; the latest pic showed they survived after all. There is a new group photo at the T-Rex.blueapple_x wrote:Lol did someone snapchat/ tweet about this?sweetmm wrote:The ride Cat & are on just stop; I think the lesson here is never share the same ride as if you don't want a stalled ride
