biatchqueen wrote:
[offtopic]
[/offtopic]
re Kanye:
I agree with all of this. The way Kanye delivered the message was problematic, offensive and morally questionable, but that doesn't mean it isn't artistic or that there wasn't a damn good message behind the video
not the song which is shit. That society's obsession with celebrity is so invasive as to leave them with no privacy, that we'd even watch them sleep, that they are 'naked' to us - we can see everything about them and their lives and they have no choice and are sometimes not aware that it's happening, that the rich and powerful are all in bed together - in the same situation and potentially in the same network. I would have thought some of these points would be particularly pertinent to Dan who struggles with a sometimes obsessive fanbase who do leave him no privacy, who are interested in every aspect of his life. To me, it's a message in itself that he's saying he finds resonance with Kanye's video. I'm not famous, so I can't understand what it's like - if Dan who is famous thinks there is some value in Kanye's portrayal of what's it's like then who am I to deny or criticise this expression?
I do, however, as a Swiftie (
yes I am a twenty-something Swiftie so shoot me) hope Taylor sues Kanye ass because that shit's not on.
Dan has not done or said anything problematic in my opinion. He has not tweeted 'there is nothing wrong with using graphic images of women without their consent', he has tweeted 'this video has an artistic message about fame and how it leaves you no privacy which I find resonance with'.
Catallena wrote:Phil has done and said plenty of problematic stuff in his lifetime (just like every person ever) and you're seemingly perfectly able to ignore that? Dan stans Kanye, Phil is a Joss Whedon fanboy.
[offtopic]
[/offtopic]
SquishPhan wrote:Honestly I don't really care what game they play as long as the banter is good.
ditto I'm not really a gamer so idc