I wish I could tell you guys but honestly I'm not even meant to be on here, due to a contract I signed (not directly with dan and phil but people that know them).
I'm only talking about the proof that's in the "public eye", but Charlie himself said he was never in a relationship with Phil, but there's things pointing to him having..sexual relations with him. So they might not have been going out, but friends with benefits.
It's all quite blurry and in complete honesty the phan timeline is inaccurate/ a mess in many ways, especially with Dan/Phil/Charlie deleting a lot of things. (for example, 2012 wasn't even the 'bad year' of dan and phil)
The cherry/pinacolada lube is the best proof I've got, that's accessible by anyone I mean.
Your favourite Dan and Phil/phandom conspiracy theory?
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
- Waggle9007
- sofa crease
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:50 am
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: UK
Aren't you the same person who thought they could 'blackmail' Dan with information that no one else seemed to have, and didn't actually exist in the first place?wolfgutscharlie wrote:I wish I could tell you guys but honestly I'm not even meant to be on here, due to a contract I signed (not directly with dan and phil but people that know them
Just to confirm, you're just as welcome on IDB as anyone else lol.wolfgutscharlie wrote:I wish I could tell you guys but honestly I'm not even meant to be on here, due to a contract I signed (not directly with dan and phil but people that know them).
tl;dr... I don't want this forum to have some sort of bad reputation, it's not a bad place at all and it puzzles me because anyone who browses around can see it's just a fan forum and nothing to do with GG at all. We were pretty much exiled from the Deppy thread there because we were too nice! lol. But if there's a contract that names us then we don't know about it, but I feel like we really should. Because that's a little unsettling. IDB really isn't a scary or intimidating place and I can't see why that would be a thing.
I mean, Dan even gave us a shout out lol. We got the Howell seal of approval
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
Yep. Youtube relationships are more serious than what you think.Ticia wrote:Sorry, but a confidentiality agreement to not to tell who is fucking whom?
And I'm talking from terms of what I knew BEFORE I even found out everything, this theory was collected from difference screenshots and what people told me before that /isn't/ under the contract. It's no secret that Charlie and Phil were fucking.
Last edited by fringechecks on Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
I didn't say that? Umm.. my friend had been emailing Dan since she was 12, due to her mental health problems, she was asking him to help her with them and stuff for 4 years and she never replied. So I got really mad and sent an email I really shouldn't have, but that screenshot of Dan reading a ton of emails multiple times wasn't from my emails, it was from my other friend's email.Waggle9007 wrote:Aren't you the same person who thought they could 'blackmail' Dan with information that no one else seemed to have, and didn't actually exist in the first place?wolfgutscharlie wrote:I wish I could tell you guys but honestly I'm not even meant to be on here, due to a contract I signed (not directly with dan and phil but people that know them
Yes I know things but I've signed a contract, and I matured, I don't hate Dan and don't see a reason to get anything out of him anymore because my questions were answered.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaXlNVIAAb536.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaY_oWAAA8HCR.jpg
(due to a group chat that was EXTREMELY serious getting leaked, the reason the whole 'omg dan is getting hacked!!' situation even started)
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.human wrote:Just to confirm, you're just as welcome on IDB as anyone else lol.wolfgutscharlie wrote:I wish I could tell you guys but honestly I'm not even meant to be on here, due to a contract I signed (not directly with dan and phil but people that know them).
tl;dr... I don't want this forum to have some sort of bad reputation, it's not a bad place at all and it puzzles me because anyone who browses around can see it's just a fan forum and nothing to do with GG at all. We were pretty much exiled from the Deppy thread there because we were too nice! lol. But if there's a contract that names us then we don't know about it, but I feel like we really should. Because that's a little unsettling. IDB really isn't a scary or intimidating place and I can't see why that would be a thing.
I mean, Dan even gave us a shout out lol. We got the Howell seal of approval
But the last time I checked, people were shit talking me on here for supposedly 'black mailing' Dan? (which is completely false)
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
- SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
This confuses me, because according to who are you not allowed to talk about anything personal about and why?wolfgutscharlie wrote: Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.
- missemma
- #teamshavedsides

- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 4:08 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: london
I think when you tweet that you're going to 'leak their address, old home addresses and delete dans account because you got past the security question' people might talk about things like that! Also, your Twitter bio did used to have 'Dan hacker' listed on it. It's the nature of the forum, you can't really blame people for not liking the things you have said in the past.
- confusedpanda
- ar·tic·u·late
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:20 pm
- Pronouns: Her/she
- Location: Somewhere in the USA
Why exactly should we trust what you're saying about all this though? You've acted like a troll in the past before with mulitple things on your Twitter. The things listed to not disclose, have all been talked about on GG or somewhere on this forum. None of that is actually "confidential" to just that group chat. That's not even a legally binding contract you have there. All it says is that you'll be banned from the group permanently and that "serious consequences" would be taken if anything was leaked. You made it sound like you signed a legal disclosure with an actual lawyer. You say you've matured but none of this is actually showing you've matured. I don't know you personally, but based on past troll acts, I can guarantee you that it'll be a long time before anyone actually believes anything you say, if you are telling the truth.wolfgutscharlie wrote:Yes I know things but I've signed a contract, and I matured, I don't hate Dan and don't see a reason to get anything out of him anymore because my questions were answered.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaXlNVIAAb536.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaY_oWAAA8HCR.jpg
(due to a group chat that was EXTREMELY serious getting leaked, the reason the whole 'omg dan is getting hacked!!' situation even started)
We're here, we're queer, we're filled with existential fear!

gif cred: pseudophan on tumblr

gif cred: pseudophan on tumblr
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
I'll explain why I tweeted that.missemma wrote:I think when you tweet that you're going to 'leak their address, old home addresses and delete dans account because you got past the security question' people might talk about things like that! Also, your Twitter bio did used to have 'Dan hacker' listed on it. It's the nature of the forum, you can't really blame people for not liking the things you have said in the past.
My friend, I'll call her "K" was in a group chat with someone who we thought we could trust. She joked about hacking Dan, due to me and my friend "R" ACTUALLY hacking Charlieskies days before. The person freaked out, and leaked the group chats to a popular phan account, in which my friend "K" was getting hate she couldn't handle. So I was like "I can do something to divert their attention" so I tweeted that and then used inspect element to "fake hack" Dan. I was only trying to get the attention of those attacking my friend, not get the attention I actually got.
People can hate me all they want, I mean, it's a running trait in the phandom.
According to most people they think I'm a fucking psychopath who can't feel empathy, which is just great.
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
If you couldn't tell, there was things censored out in the pictures because somethings literally if I told you you wouldn't believe me, at all. And it's extremely personal, and I shouldn't know at all.confusedpanda wrote:Why exactly should we trust what you're saying about all this though? You've acted like a troll in the past before with mulitple things on your Twitter. The things listed to not disclose, have all been talked about on GG or somewhere on this forum. None of that is actually "confidential" to just that group chat. That's not even a legally binding contract you have there. All it says is that you'll be banned from the group permanently and that "serious consequences" would be taken if anything was leaked. You made it sound like you signed a legal disclosure with an actual lawyer. You say you've matured but none of this is actually showing you've matured. I don't know you personally, but based on past troll acts, I can guarantee you that it'll be a long time before anyone actually believes anything you say, if you are telling the truth.wolfgutscharlie wrote:Yes I know things but I've signed a contract, and I matured, I don't hate Dan and don't see a reason to get anything out of him anymore because my questions were answered.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaXlNVIAAb536.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CouaY_oWAAA8HCR.jpg
(due to a group chat that was EXTREMELY serious getting leaked, the reason the whole 'omg dan is getting hacked!!' situation even started)
It was actually made by a lawyer, in which I had to sign it in front of them with the rest of the people who did.
I have matured but I can't really express that when people have unnecessary hatred towards me because of my tweets? The majority of things I tweet are JOKES, as I have a sense of humour some don't understand.
After all the shit the phandom gave me, I don't care if people believe me or not, it's not like I HAVE to talk to people about theories/the actual phan timeline/whatever.
And yeah, people don't know me personally, that's why they were insulting my mental health!
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
Because it's information people in the phandom SHOULDN'T know and it could cause massive shit/2013 all over again in the youtube community.SquishPhan wrote:This confuses me, because according to who are you not allowed to talk about anything personal about and why?wolfgutscharlie wrote: Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
- SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
According to who should the phadom not know these things?wolfgutscharlie wrote:Because it's information people in the phandom SHOULDN'T know and it could cause massive shit/2013 all over again in the youtube community.SquishPhan wrote:This confuses me, because according to who are you not allowed to talk about anything personal about and why?wolfgutscharlie wrote: Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.
+1. Honestly, there's nothing you've said that hasn't been smoke. If you'd like to share info / participate on this forum like another user, please be our guest, but if you only came here for your two minutes of fame and some shitposting...SquishPhan wrote:According to who should the phadom not know these things?wolfgutscharlie wrote:Because it's information people in the phandom SHOULDN'T know and it could cause massive shit/2013 all over again in the youtube community.SquishPhan wrote:This confuses me, because according to who are you not allowed to talk about anything personal about and why?wolfgutscharlie wrote: Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.
By the way, you should fire your "lawyer", or send him/her back to law school.

-
pearshaped34
- morning quiff
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:42 am
I don't really want to get involved in this but I just want to remind everyone you can't win against a troll by giving them the attention they wanted in the first place.
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
I'm not going to bother trying to talk to anyone on here, because I've just scrolled through threads about me and people are insulting me and my mental health, which I thought was against the rules?
Tut tut, and people thought I was the one fucked in the head? Next time people take their time to insult my mental health, please say it to me DIRECTLY!
Tut tut, and people thought I was the one fucked in the head? Next time people take their time to insult my mental health, please say it to me DIRECTLY!
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
(when you go to edit a post and delete it instead. this is probably the aftermath of having only slept three hours.)
You have a pattern of seeking attention in somewhat strange and questionable ways and this is probably what people are trying to point out, not to 'persecute' you, but to make you aware of what you're doing and why on earth you're doing it. If it really is a joke apparently the punchline has been lost on everyone but you.
tl;dr Based on the above, I don't think the skeptiscm being thrown your way is unreasonable or unfounded. I hope you're in a good place now and that maybe you might consider other forms of discussion that don't revolve on instigating rumors about information you may or may not have, leading you right back into a vicious circle of the kind of attention you've already said you don't want.
Yet, you post suggestive comments on a forum to stir up potential curiosity and attention towards that end anyway. If it's information no one should know, why comment on it in the first place instead of keeping it to yourself and having done with it? You are purposefully vague talking about information you are supposedly uncomfortable even mentioning, under the guise of being issued some type of 'gag order' that doesn't even look like a proper legal document so much as a standard terms of agreement for members of any forum, chatgroup or web site.wolfgutscharlie wrote:Because it's information people in the phandom SHOULDN'T know and it could cause massive shit/2013 all over again in the youtube community.SquishPhan wrote:This confuses me, because according to who are you not allowed to talk about anything personal about and why?wolfgutscharlie wrote: Well what I meant was I'm not meant to be talking about anything personal with Dan/Phil at all, aka why I shouldn't be on here.
So, if I understand correctly...you and your friend successfully infringed on someone else's account (Charlie's. Allegedly.) and were surprised when someone took your joke of hacking Dan seriously and your response to all the negative attention it brought was to create more negative attention by fomenting the belief that you actually were hacking Dan, but you wanted a different kind of attention, just 'not the one you got.' Then your response to Dan not answering your friend's emails on a serious topic he probably felt out of his depth for an appropriate way to respond to, as he's an entertainer not a mental health professional or someone else better suited to addressing your friend's needs, was to write 'an email you shouldn't have.'wolfgutscharlie wrote:I'll explain why I tweeted that.missemma wrote:I think when you tweet that you're going to 'leak their address, old home addresses and delete dans account because you got past the security question' people might talk about things like that! Also, your Twitter bio did used to have 'Dan hacker' listed on it. It's the nature of the forum, you can't really blame people for not liking the things you have said in the past.
My friend, I'll call her "K" was in a group chat with someone who we thought we could trust. She joked about hacking Dan, due to me and my friend "R" ACTUALLY hacking Charlieskies days before. The person freaked out, and leaked the group chats to a popular phan account, in which my friend "K" was getting hate she couldn't handle. So I was like "I can do something to divert their attention" so I tweeted that and then used inspect element to "fake hack" Dan. I was only trying to get the attention of those attacking my friend, not get the attention I actually got.
People can hate me all they want, I mean, it's a running trait in the phandom.
According to most people they think I'm a fucking psychopath who can't feel empathy, which is just great.
You have a pattern of seeking attention in somewhat strange and questionable ways and this is probably what people are trying to point out, not to 'persecute' you, but to make you aware of what you're doing and why on earth you're doing it. If it really is a joke apparently the punchline has been lost on everyone but you.
tl;dr Based on the above, I don't think the skeptiscm being thrown your way is unreasonable or unfounded. I hope you're in a good place now and that maybe you might consider other forms of discussion that don't revolve on instigating rumors about information you may or may not have, leading you right back into a vicious circle of the kind of attention you've already said you don't want.
-
fringechecks
- banned
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:25 pm
- Pronouns: xer/xem
But it IS. Whoever stalked my twitter and my friend's twitter is CREEPY. I do not expect to look through this forum and see MULTIPLE people going against the rules, yet not get a warning for it? Yes I did hack into Charlie's account, but that wasn't PUBLIC information. Only those following my twitter account knew, which wasn't a lot of people. Dan isn't a mental health professional but you think if some 12 year old emails him all the time for 4 years, to the age of 16 that he'd reply ONCE but he didn't. And the email wasn't just due to my friend, but the mindset I had back then.
What do you mean by that? I'm "strange" and "questionable" because no one FUCKING TALKS TO ME. They go and screenshot and link shit that I've said and say "OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SHE'S FUCKING MENTAL AHHHHHH HOPE SHE GETS SUED AND DIES!!!!!!!!!!" onto here. No one ever says,"hey, why did you do ...... and .....?". I'd happy explain but the phandom doesn't give anyone any chance to speak, let alone breathe.
The "fake hacking Dan" was meant to be serious, it wasn't a joke because I was trying to gain the hate from my friend and put it onto me.
And I'm far from a good place, and looking at all this shit being spewed about me makes me feel 100x worse.
What do you mean by that? I'm "strange" and "questionable" because no one FUCKING TALKS TO ME. They go and screenshot and link shit that I've said and say "OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO SHE'S FUCKING MENTAL AHHHHHH HOPE SHE GETS SUED AND DIES!!!!!!!!!!" onto here. No one ever says,"hey, why did you do ...... and .....?". I'd happy explain but the phandom doesn't give anyone any chance to speak, let alone breathe.
The "fake hacking Dan" was meant to be serious, it wasn't a joke because I was trying to gain the hate from my friend and put it onto me.
And I'm far from a good place, and looking at all this shit being spewed about me makes me feel 100x worse.
used to go by the dreaded username 'wolfgutscharlie'
Moderating
Okay, everyone, it's time to get back on topic. IDB is not the place to have arguments like this.
wolfgutscharlie, you're more than welcome to post here, but please remember to follow the rules. I'd also recommend that you don't post vague statements about having information that could cause "2013 all over again", without having tangible, genuine, proof to go along with it - that's trolling 101.
If you think that any poster has broken the rules, report the post and a mod will deal with it - don't put words into other people's mouths.
Okay, everyone, it's time to get back on topic. IDB is not the place to have arguments like this.
wolfgutscharlie, you're more than welcome to post here, but please remember to follow the rules. I'd also recommend that you don't post vague statements about having information that could cause "2013 all over again", without having tangible, genuine, proof to go along with it - that's trolling 101.
If you think that any poster has broken the rules, report the post and a mod will deal with it - don't put words into other people's mouths.

It was obvs a subtle Valentine's day gift :3
Also, I've been bored the past 2 days when I could have been having fun reading this last 2 pages!!! I even eat my popcorn while watching anime yesterday, I could have eat it while reading this instead
Also, I've been bored the past 2 days when I could have been having fun reading this last 2 pages!!! I even eat my popcorn while watching anime yesterday, I could have eat it while reading this instead










