trashqueen wrote:i love how i even bolded my questions to try to make sure he didn't just answer part of them as he has been doing when people mention the censored urls so instead he ignored my entire post
maybe now that i'm using a size 200 font he would feel obligated to answer?
I'm currently asking in his 'rules' thread about the lovely Rule 3a, and either he's lying for the sake of lying. Or there are rules that he can see, that the rest of us can't (and it's been referenced as "Rule 3" and having been in place from the old mods before as I discovered when I did a search for 'exempt from rules').human wrote:I'm completely baffled by a staff who think they can just edit rules without notice and then inform all users they agreed to them when they signed up, as if they were that way all along. UM NO WE DIDN'T AGREE TO SOME OF THISE RULES - you literally just added them. It's pretty sickening to me. Ultimately, it's "his" site I presume so he can run it as he pleases but he's doing a pretty lowsy and unprofessional job of it. I hope people continue to migrate to here and YTT, I really do. For the sake of the sanity of it's users lol.
WOW. What a way to avoid a question. I don't understand what he's even trying to achieve, everyone in the clarfication thread knows it wasn't just 1 post being deleted and is anyone else really going to believe him when he: 1) writes so illogically and childishly, 2) has so many people pissed at him, and 3) when the DP thread is literally deserted when it used to get a new thread every 6 days. That many people don't desert for what he's saying happened.highbythebeach wrote:trashqueen wrote:i love how i even bolded my questions to try to make sure he didn't just answer part of them as he has been doing when people mention the censored urls so instead he ignored my entire post
maybe now that i'm using a size 200 font he would feel obligated to answer?
new poster, sorry if I mess anything up BUT OH MY GOD ARE YOU KIDDING???
There's no outward appearance that you were banned, so he could probably just say that you were never really banned. At this point, I would have no idea which users are banned in that thread if it weren't for people reporting here.jaej wrote:aaand i'm banned. banned twice, actually, since it was an IP ban and i switched to 3G to question the ban,i get why ofc, but i want to know what the official excuse is. asking for a clarification in the clarifications thread..? gg jaej died so that idb jaej could live. it was getting kind of pointless, anyway. it didn't matter how reasonable my question was, since he'd ignore them and say i hadn't asked anything or he couldn't understand me anyway. good luck to everyone else, though! please continue posting updates
angrymob wrote:WOW. What a way to avoid a question. I don't understand what he's even trying to achieve, everyone in the clarfication thread knows it wasn't just 1 post being deleted and is anyone else really going to believe him when he: 1) writes so illogically and childishly, 2) has so many people pissed at him, and 3) when the DP thread is literally deserted when it used to get a new thread every 6 days. That many people don't desert for what he's saying happened.highbythebeach wrote:trashqueen wrote:i love how i even bolded my questions to try to make sure he didn't just answer part of them as he has been doing when people mention the censored urls so instead he ignored my entire post
maybe now that i'm using a size 200 font he would feel obligated to answer?
new poster, sorry if I mess anything up BUT OH MY GOD ARE YOU KIDDING???
I'm still baffled at the editing of trashqueen's post, though.
Dan Howell wrote:'[someone] just sent me a message saying 'Phil'..... same'
jaej wrote:i can't log in anymore, regardless of ip, hahaha. it just continually redirects to the login screen like that's not an account. doesn't even say it's deactivated but i can't get in. rip jaej. maybe i never existed and you're all delusional.
I'm baffled by his (his?) immaturity with the whole thing. And yet it kinda is hilarious hearing this as a 20+ year old.trashqueen wrote:
is he 12? i'm laughing tbh i don't need an answer i was just enjoying how fucking stupid the situation was and amazingly he managed to make it even better
i'm having middle school flashbacks
EDIT: I WENT TO CHECK FOR MYSELF ON GG AND
Information
You have been banned from this board until Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:47 pm.
Please contact the Board Administrator for more information.
A ban has been issued on your IP address.
is he being serious oh my god
i have been banned for asking a legitimate question in a thread created for asking questions, let that sink in
Now what the fuck did he expect? Nobody to ask questions? It really isn't that hard to answer all of those questions, especially with his dumb ass juvenile answers."you all literally expect 1 person to respond to a let's just say 50 posts instantly and all at once? HAHAHAHAHA "
isn't it meant to tell you that when you log in? ah, well.spider wrote:jaej wrote:i can't log in anymore, regardless of ip, hahaha. it just continually redirects to the login screen like that's not an account. doesn't even say it's deactivated but i can't get in. rip jaej. maybe i never existed and you're all delusional.
Try to send the activation by e-mail, then it will say if your account was deactivated or not.jaej wrote:i can't log in anymore, regardless of ip, hahaha. it just continually redirects to the login screen like that's not an account. doesn't even say it's deactivated but i can't get in. rip jaej. maybe i never existed and you're all delusional.
icklebrina wrote:EDIT: LOL I just read the definitions of trolling, and have never seen a more apt description of Morgan's behaviour
Yes Morgan we know. You don't have to keep demonstrating.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY AN ADMIN, ARE EXEMPT FROM ALL THESE RULES
wtfamidoinghere wrote:So let me just sum this up:And we are the ones embarrassing ourselves?
- Two mods out of control banned a bunch of regular users, who were well liked and not known for being rude or breaking rules, without warning and most of those bans were fully unfustified. That's not being debated anymore, right? ColdHeartedBitch has conceded this.
- Lots of posts asking for explanations have been deleted as off topic, even in the OFF TOPIC thread of the D+P subforum, right?
- Concerns and complaints have been met with ridicule, condescension and agression. Prove: This thread and all the screenshots of PMs with Morgan.
- You say you don't care if people leave, yet you even changed the rules to justify the censoring of links to competing forums - even in PMs, as screenshots show.
- You made a thread for people to ask for clarification, but now you don't want to deal with it and instead continue to ridicule us.
I mean, the Dan and Phil subforum is dead, so i guess it doesn't matter how you treat the few remaining users from there, but the velvetghost thread has a chance to go back to normal since it was never as community oriented and not everyone left in the first place, so surely antagonizing users further is not the best way to handle this, right?
I'm guessing you do want them to stay, or why else would you censor links tho other forums?
And of course, sorry for wasting your time by voicing my concerns and asking for clarification. In this thread that was made for doing that.
As in, we only posted PMs of people who were fine with having their usernames out there. Also, they volunteered that information to us.gasp wrote:So an extremely large number of you didn't know the beef that went down with Gabz_is_shite (also referred to as Gabz and morty). To explain, we want to share this formal complaint we planned to lodge with Morgan a while ago. It has screenshots etc of the lies that she spread, rules she broke, etc. I don't want y'all to think we are bullies. There were reasons for her fall.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XgW ... sp=sharing
its not all inclusive- we didn't get permission from some users to show their messages etc. But it does begin to show the problem that existed.
I did not get a warning. Either way, I got into the whole thing knowing I would get banned, so I don't particularly care.timtam wrote:I just saw the original post by Jhamba on the Gabs thread and saw that Jhamba called GIS a horrible little worm. Now I have to admit that I find this a bit harsh but I've seen worse on that website before. I absolutely agree with everything else Jhamba stated about GIS being a liar and a terrible mod but I'd just like some clarification on what happened. Did GIS ban Jhamba straight away? Without any warnings? Because even with that personal attack thats bullshit.
Please don't think that I'm trying to defend GG here because everything they have done is an absolutely disgusting abuse of power. I just wanted to know the context of this particular banning. Morgan seems to think that Jhamba's ban is justifiable because of the 'personal attack'. But in reality if Jhamba didn't get any warnings then it was against the rules to ban her. I have tried to read everything here and on GG to get the full picture but its overwhelming so just point me somewhere if this has already been addressed.
Still I'm kinda glad this went down. I'm enjoying this forum's atmosphere at more than GG.
