Things that are amazing:
-
eevee's post
- Dan's tweet
- #takethepillforphil
- all insults aimed at Internet Explorer
spider wrote:This is something I only thought of now but what if didn't care about doing a 2nd book? We know Youtubers have 2 book contracts. TABINOF was Deppy's bible that if they died from a meteor it would be what they left behind. Maybe Deppy only cared about TABINOF but since they had to make a 2nd book they didn't make it a big deal and just filled it with pictures.
I also think this
Delayed but:
Hi
fauxchinaplates
Agree with everything said on the offensiveness of 'let's react to Kpop because it's so foreign and exotic and therefore something reaction-worthy'.
But I'm still annoyed they are reacting to Kpop again. I'd be annoyed if they made them react to any type of music more than once. If they made them react to American pop music more than once I'd be
more annoyed.
Re: comments section
Respectfully, I disagree
I don't take it too seriously. Everything written by the phandom in the comments section is a joke™. The clue is in the cap locks.
A Key To Understanding Phandom YouTube Comments
?!??!!! / !!11!!! = Another clue that it's all a joke™
'PHEELS' = a clever play on words and a joke™, again the clue is in the cap locks. It's both self-mockery and mockery of the stereotypical fangirl who ALWAYS TALKS IN CAPITAL LETTERS!!111!!!
(also sometimes refers to phan being mildly cute, something I'm sure most of the posters on this forum can relate to).
PROTIP / I'M CRAFTING = It's funny because it's annoying, and it's annoying because it's funny
Heart Eyes Howell = a mildly interesting observation about body language
There's this weird moment at [insert time stamp] where it looks like a phan moment = typically another mildly interesting observation about body language - kind of harmless thing to analyse on the grand scale of things.
Dan bottoms 2k16 = not letting go that one time Dan favourited a tweet by accident (as per his request to 'never let that one go')/forever cyberbullying your idols because you know they can take a joke.
Phil's a cinnamon roll / omg Phil swore = a genuine reaction to exposure to Phil's recent child-safe branding.
I'm surprised when Phil piles animals on top of each other in a twitter photo and implies their having an orgy, so yes it is surprising to see Phil swear.
So I respectfully disagree, although I understand where you're all coming from and you have the right to take that position since over the top humour done on a mass scale can sometimes look a little much. I think because the phandom is so numerous and engaged this is exacerbated. But 99% of the time I believe the commenter is a rational fifteen year old having a good time pissing about on the internet. I usually don't comment on YouTube as a rule, but I do find them endlessly entertaining to read. Having said that, just write all this off as just my personal opinion, because I know that it is an unpopular one and most people disagree. I just wanted to put this out into the universe, but let's all just agree to disagree.