Hi all. Tbh, I don’t have anything of consequence to add, just felt like chiming in, so feel free to ignore . . .
pearshaped34 wrote:
Assuming Dan would do something because a low-life like Onision does it is not something he deserves. He is not on Onision's level so I do not accept Dan could do this because we know Onision does it as being a valid argument.
Lurktacularr wrote:Does anyone feel a bit about the flurry of new posters with the 'Dan is prolly straight its just for hashtagbants' agenda?
Srsly tho where'd you all come from at the same time
does seem suspicious
Re: Dan’s sexuality - +1 for “not straight” (personal opinion, not a lable). Ditto for Phil’s.
AND +1 for “it doesn’t really matter much to me”. Lbr, Dan is ‘Philsexual’ and Phil is ‘Dansexual’
(sorry, not sorry).
Honestly, after almost 7 years, until I see one of them with someone else, or hear them say they are dating someone else, they’re together. (thanks
fancybum for talking me off the ledge).
bluewho wrote:
Discovering you're biromantic because you wouldn't mind cuddling with Dan Howell and announcing this to Youtube? = the definition of awkward
too true!
bluewho wrote:Does anyone think may have this kind of relationship - romantic love, without the sexual attraction?
For me, it's a strong no. I thought they were together the first time I saw them, and aside from the minor heart attack I had at the beginning of the DITL Australia bit
(still salty, I'd like a heaping spoonful of domestic now please), it has never crossed my mind that sex was not involved. Admittedly, I'm #1 phan , but those two are as 'in love' as people can ever hope to be.
(projection is a wonderful tool)