Long, over-analytical timestamps incoming
2:00 Phil doesn’t consider the possibility of a non-binary or agender raindeer.
I’m lowkey disappointed
(and maybe a tiny bit hurt? just a tiny bit) that Phil hasn’t fully internalised the concept of non-binary gender, but not really surprised.
2:37 spraying himself pink to go out on the town. If that’s not the gayest thing I’ve ever heard I don’t know what is
3:43 Reindeer fun? Is that what we’re calling it?
His and Dan’s names are generally listed together.
would he say that he and Dan are “paired off” and “having fun”?
4:25 “know each other well” is clearly a euphemism. Dan
is pretends to be jealous over Phil having furry fun with a probably fictional reindeer.
5:02 so far Dan has been avoiding pronouns while Phil has been using he/him. Phil’s mouse goes to “no” but Dan reminds him to choose “don’t know”
6:00-6:24 Phil harrus the sad truth of chirstmas. Not as good at harruing as Dan, but he will improve with practice I’m sure.
6:25 Paired off with Cupid, but definitely not married. Does Cupid not identify as female, or are they paired off but not married, or does Comet have a secret wife who isn't part of the sleigh gang and he's cheating on with Cupid?
6:30 Probably lives with best friend, but we don’t know whether best friend is Cupid or one of the other reindeer
7:06 narrowly avoided saying “does he com”
7:20 adorable fighting over what to tell the closest thing they currently have to children.
Phil looks at the camera, but not directly, sort of sideways? while Dan looks at Phil
8:26 hypothetical marriage angst
8:30 Mrs Claws married for the money and now resents her husband’s life decisions
Dan is always choosing “don’t know” rather than guessing like Phil wants to. Something about not wanting to fill in the blanks in a famous person’s life when you don’t know the whole story?
8:38 “they’re happily married” in a much deeper voice than Phil’s usual on-camera tone. I feel like they’re not quite imagining the same story here
8:39 Dan comments on akinator rather than agreeing or disagreeing with Phil
9:51 I have an idea “omnigender” was deemed problematic because it implies identification with all genders, including those belonging to specific cultures, but it doesn’t surprise or disappoint me that Dan isn’t far enough up tumblr’s arse to know that off the top of his head
10:30 unnecessary moment of sentimentality
10:35 so they like to do it in the lounge?
10:56 in what way would the tree be a warrior?
11:22 what does Dan say here? I’m not sure I’m hearing correctly. “let’s not go down that like weird furry out-take from my life”?