I totally agree and think he had a right to be pissed. Even his mean tumblr answers, I get why he was so mad! But sitting their and acting like being gay is silly/the grossest thing ever while denying it isn't okay unless he was doing it to protect his privacy. I don't have a problem with his general attitude at the time because he really struggled with "fame" and had every right to be pissed at all the different invasions of privacy. He did have a lot going on so I empathize with him a lot.papierklemmen wrote:obviously i can't say for sure, but i thought his whole 2012 era was not just a reaction to the voldy, but a combination of things, e.g. people stalking his family, digging up his old pictures, including the nudes and, as he mentioned, people "connecting the dots" (timelines) and spreading around that "phan is real" as a fact, which prompted the change in how he and phil behaved around each other. the way they addressed voldy separately from the rest seemed pretty normal, at least initially.MoonPride wrote:Well his Tumblr response is what stands out for me, but then his behaviour around the whole incident which drip fed into 2012 and how he changed around Phil just makes me sad. I'm saying this if it was 100% a prank. Otherwise if it was real then his actions were totally justified and I can't fault him for how reacted.papierklemmen wrote:...that's exactly what i don't get. which of his comments on the video were rude or defensive? apart from the infamous last tumblr answer.MoonPride wrote: I'm not saying his 'I'm not gay' comments are douchey, I'm talking about his general reaction to the video. If it was a prank then there was no need to be so defensive and rude to fans about it
... ok i'm having a dejavu now since i'm certain i've read these exact conversations on both gg and here millions of times. time to go back to lurking.
Dan & Phil Part 36: Wholesome Howell and AmazingPhlegm
-
secretagentphan
- procrastinator
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:38 am
I didn't even notice that, good observation.000dia000 wrote:This is completely OT but the real mystery here (correct me if I'm wrong, due to my ignorance to the old YouTube layout) but it appears that LessAmazingPhil has 247 videos this time? When it only currently has 29? Is this actually the number of videos the user who screenshotted this image watched, the number of videos maybe Phil on this channel has watched/liked himself....? Because it doesn't make sense to me how he could have had over 200 videos on this channel-and only 8 remain from this time period.dannonfill wrote:
Do you know if in 2011, the number of videos included private and unlisted videos? That could explain it if Phil (like other vloggers used to do) used this channel to send private video messages or post videos he was not sure to post on his main channel and eventually just left them there in private setting.
"I'm okay with things being awkward between us."
- alittledizzy
- actual demon phannie

- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
lessamazingphil is where all of his unlisted "interactive" video options are. There were at least 40 for one of those interactive stories alone, and he did a few of them over the years (Christmas Adventure, Space Adventure, Ghost Story Game, etc). If I had to make a guess I'd say that youtube might have included all those unlisted ones in the video count back then, but don't now.lerien wrote:I didn't even notice that, good observation.000dia000 wrote:This is completely OT but the real mystery here (correct me if I'm wrong, due to my ignorance to the old YouTube layout) but it appears that LessAmazingPhil has 247 videos this time? When it only currently has 29? Is this actually the number of videos the user who screenshotted this image watched, the number of videos maybe Phil on this channel has watched/liked himself....? Because it doesn't make sense to me how he could have had over 200 videos on this channel-and only 8 remain from this time period.dannonfill wrote:
Do you know if in 2011, the number of videos included private and unlisted videos? That could explain it if Phil (like other vloggers used to do) used this channel to send private video messages or post videos he was not sure to post on his main channel and eventually just left them there in private setting.
@lerien
metadata is useless, it usually gets removed when you upload it to image sharing sites for compression.
besides, a screencap (print screen) saves no metadata except maybe the name of the program with which it was saved, it's not a photograph.
every version of Ps automatically saved the program name in the metadata, but not more common programs like paint.
metadata is useless, it usually gets removed when you upload it to image sharing sites for compression.
besides, a screencap (print screen) saves no metadata except maybe the name of the program with which it was saved, it's not a photograph.
every version of Ps automatically saved the program name in the metadata, but not more common programs like paint.
Indeed, after a little digging - and an extensive use of internet wayback machine - I found that on December 2012, LessAmazingPhil had 175 videos (admittedly less than the indicated 247 videos but much closer than 29). So I think we can conclude that unlisted videos were indeed counted in the number of videos of a channel back in the days (the missing 99 videos having been delated between 2010 and 2012 I suppose).alittledizzy wrote:lessamazingphil is where all of his unlisted "interactive" video options are. There were at least 40 for one of those interactive stories alone, and he did a few of them over the years (Christmas Adventure, Space Adventure, Ghost Story Game, etc). If I had to make a guess I'd say that youtube might have included all those unlisted ones in the video count back then, but don't now.lerien wrote:I didn't even notice that, good observation.000dia000 wrote:This is completely OT but the real mystery here (correct me if I'm wrong, due to my ignorance to the old YouTube layout) but it appears that LessAmazingPhil has 247 videos this time? When it only currently has 29? Is this actually the number of videos the user who screenshotted this image watched, the number of videos maybe Phil on this channel has watched/liked himself....? Because it doesn't make sense to me how he could have had over 200 videos on this channel-and only 8 remain from this time period.dannonfill wrote:
Do you know if in 2011, the number of videos included private and unlisted videos? That could explain it if Phil (like other vloggers used to do) used this channel to send private video messages or post videos he was not sure to post on his main channel and eventually just left them there in private setting.
Here is the screenshot from Internet WaybackMachine
"I'm okay with things being awkward between us."
Yeah I was searching for the program's name, since I'm pretty sure it's done with Ps if it's editedmalday wrote:@lerien
metadata is useless, it usually gets removed when you upload it to image sharing sites for compression.
besides, a screencap (print screen) saves no metadata except maybe the name of the program with which it was saved, it's not a photograph.
every version of Ps automatically saved the program name in the metadata, but not more common programs like paint.
Overall I think the screenshot quality is just too poor to draw any conclusion.
"I'm okay with things being awkward between us."
-
secretagentphan
- procrastinator
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:38 am
If it was faked I'm mad the phannie included that furry shenanigans. Like it's more realistic but if you're going to make a fantasy it should be more idealisticlerien wrote:Yeah I was searching for the program's name, since I'm pretty sure it's done with Ps if it's editedmalday wrote:@lerien
metadata is useless, it usually gets removed when you upload it to image sharing sites for compression.
besides, a screencap (print screen) saves no metadata except maybe the name of the program with which it was saved, it's not a photograph.
every version of Ps automatically saved the program name in the metadata, but not more common programs like paint.No such luck though.
Overall I think the screenshot quality is just too poor to draw any conclusion.
So, if my math is correct, there were 72 sex love videos deleted at some point in time.8 Wth?!?! How are either of them still alive?!?!lerien wrote:Indeed, after a little digging - and an extensive use of internet wayback machine - I found that on December 2012, LessAmazingPhil had 175 videos (admittedly less than the indicated 247 videos but much closer than 29). So I think we can conclude that unlisted videos were indeed counted in the number of videos of a channel back in the days (the missing 99 videos having been delated between 2010 and 2012 I suppose).alittledizzy wrote:lessamazingphil is where all of his unlisted "interactive" video options are. There were at least 40 for one of those interactive stories alone, and he did a few of them over the years (Christmas Adventure, Space Adventure, Ghost Story Game, etc). If I had to make a guess I'd say that youtube might have included all those unlisted ones in the video count back then, but don't now.lerien wrote:I didn't even notice that, good observation.000dia000 wrote:This is completely OT but the real mystery here (correct me if I'm wrong, due to my ignorance to the old YouTube layout) but it appears that LessAmazingPhil has 247 videos this time? When it only currently has 29? Is this actually the number of videos the user who screenshotted this image watched, the number of videos maybe Phil on this channel has watched/liked himself....? Because it doesn't make sense to me how he could have had over 200 videos on this channel-and only 8 remain from this time period.dannonfill wrote:
Do you know if in 2011, the number of videos included private and unlisted videos? That could explain it if Phil (like other vloggers used to do) used this channel to send private video messages or post videos he was not sure to post on his main channel and eventually just left them there in private setting.
Here is the screenshot from Internet WaybackMachine
Last edited by Philena on Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Raspberrypi
- crusty sponge
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 1:08 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Ireland
[Twitter] http://twitter.com/AmazingPhil/status/8 ... 3088707585 [/Twitter]
For 4 years!?? How are they still alive?
For 4 years!?? How are they still alive?
Last edited by Raspberrypi on Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Raspberrypi
- crusty sponge
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 1:08 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Ireland
Hahaha I was thinking the same thing. A move this year is looking more and more likelymalday wrote:wow, if this isn't planting excuses to move.....Raspberrypi wrote: For 4 years!?? How are they still alive?
-
dannonfill
- spork
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:47 pm
- Pronouns: they/them
- Location: US
hmm, I wonder where Dan will do his ls. we haven't seen his room since November
... let's talk about house plants.
Oh SNAP! I love this. Might this be an excuse to do a liveshow elsewhere? #phanmove2017dannonfill wrote:hmm, I wonder where Dan will do his ls. we haven't seen his room since November
Honestly, I'm gonna need content soon or else I'll theorize about everything....
-
fleur-de-lis
- butt chair
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:33 am
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Germany
How funny, just last year the same thing happened to me! I had a gas leak for two years and was wondering how my bills suddenly got so high.
I'm really starting to believe that they're planing the seeds of excuse to move, more than ever. They caught on to us suspecting that they weren't actually sick or hibernating and instead used it as an excuse to be OOA. Now, we can't disprove or call bullshit on this claim and they'll effectively sneak out into a new home.
In another thought - this also seems to be an excuse reason why Dan won't so a liveshow later as he will be in the process of "evacuating" (ie. sorting out his new storage)
Am I stretching? Yeah. But I'm getting ticked off.
In another thought - this also seems to be an excuse reason why Dan won't so a liveshow later as he will be in the process of "evacuating" (ie. sorting out his new storage)
Am I stretching? Yeah. But I'm getting ticked off.
If Dan cancels I stg I'm going to sue them both for emotional distress. They've already been breathing those fumes for 4 years, he can endure a liveshow. What's a little more brain damage at this point.000dia000 wrote:In another thought - this also seems to be an excuse reason why Dan won't so a liveshow later as he will be in the process of "evacuating" (ie. sorting out his new storage)
Am I stretching? Yeah. But I'm getting ticked off.
Thanks and have a great day! Oil me
I am totally with you on this and if Dan cancels his live show I'm gonna be SO mad!000dia000 wrote:I'm really starting to believe that they're planing the seeds of excuse to move, more than ever. They caught on to us suspecting that they weren't actually sick or hibernating and instead used it as an excuse to be OOA. Now, we can't disprove or call bullshit on this claim and they'll effectively sneak out into a new home.
In another thought - this also seems to be an excuse reason why Dan won't so a liveshow later as he will be in the process of "evacuating" (ie. sorting out his new storage)
Am I stretching? Yeah. But I'm getting ticked off.
Maybe it's possible they found a new place already and want to move in asap, hence use this excuse to delay videos etc.

-
melon lord
- morning quiff
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:47 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: post-baking universe
I've been trying to do some backwards digging into that screenshot, the three tools more commonly known are tineye, which can be good but eh... not always reliable, Instant Search which doesn't give you a timestamp so that's almost useless but it really finds the most useless pages that may have the image if that's your thing, and using google images
but using google images within a certain time frame gave me these results for the screenshot (I apologise for the tiny letters, yes it's a screenie for ants)
tl;dr I narrowed the search to start from 2010 to 2013 (didn't matter if it was after 2013 tbh) and the first/only results of the screenshot appearing are from GG, idk if that's interesting or not? the origin of the picture in GG was that someone had a pic of the screenie with Ian running over it, and illegal said "here's the original pic" and that's the result it gives
but I can't find anywhere else with the image, from before that thread, is that weird? or is there another version of this screenshot I'm missing? am I even making sense?
but using google images within a certain time frame gave me these results for the screenshot (I apologise for the tiny letters, yes it's a screenie for ants)
but I can't find anywhere else with the image, from before that thread, is that weird? or is there another version of this screenshot I'm missing? am I even making sense?
-
dannonfill
- spork
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 2:47 pm
- Pronouns: they/them
- Location: US
@AmazingPhil
do it. I dare u Dan.
"OMG guys!
Our landlord told us we have to move out immediately into a 1 bedroom countryside villa AND get a dog to soothe us after the trauma of the gas leak! Awkward!”
I'll be upset if Dan cancels, but it would also really fuel the moving out theory sodo it. I dare u Dan.
... let's talk about house plants.
- alittledizzy
- actual demon phannie

- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
I don't know about the screenshot but if you're looking for proof that the comments were real, there's a tweet mentioning them within a couple hours of the video originally leaking in 2011. It is a person specifically saying they have screenshots of Dan and Phil's comments if anyone wants, and offering to send it privately.melon lord wrote:but I can't find anywhere else with the image, from before that thread, is that weird? or is there another version of this screenshot I'm missing? am I even making sense?
- SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
Philena wrote: Wth?!?! How are either of them still alive?!?!
But yeah definitely another good excuse to move this year.






