

(gif source: altphan)
Carry on!

Welcome!thephandommenace wrote:The thread name
Hi everyone! Lovely to meet y'all. I'm coming out of lurking hiding to post for the first time on a Deppy thread or 'phread'... ok no
Self-intro & how I turned into Deppy trash within the past 3-4 months:
Tl;dr: I'm Phil #3,943,000ish
(I hope he gets to 4mil soon, what's taking so damn long)
Hey! Welcomethephandommenace wrote:The thread name
Hi everyone! Lovely to meet y'all. I'm coming out of lurking hiding to post for the first time on a Deppy thread or 'phread'... ok no
Self-intro & how I turned into Deppy trash within the past 3-4 months:
Tl;dr: I'm Phil #3,943,000ish
(I hope he gets to 4mil soon, what's taking so damn long)

The worst part is that SO MANY comments on the video I posted were "I saw Dan and Phil and I clicked LOLZUR" :wtf: soooo embarrassingVeritine wrote:De-lurking (because of the twofold of me agreeing with you and you saying it's nice when ppl de-lurking) just to say that I completely agree, when ppl tease deppy in their thumbnails it pisses me off. Do your own stuff to gain my attention, don't use them. It cheapens your video, and it pisses off the deppy fandom :wtf: whhhyyyyy??!
*cough* theMJWay *cough* LazyJamiemalday wrote:Worst than clickbaiters are the professional reactors that turn into professional deppy reactors.
You know the ones that end up reacting to every deppy video under the sun because the phandom comes back for more.
Also... this. Why are reaction channels even a thing? Like... why would anyone want to watch that? It's like let's plays and walkthroughs (only that those two are waaaaaaay better) - you tend to watch the actual video/game instead of the one reacting/playing. You know what I mean? Your attention is taken by the bigger screen, which is, most of the time, the actual video, so... Also, if not, you also want to see what they're reacting to, so you tend to watch the actual video instead (and after watching it, you realize that you actually just watched what they reacted to, not the one who reacted). So... yeah. People should just watch the actual video.malday wrote:Worst than clickbaiters are the professional reactors that turn into professional deppy reactors.
You know the ones that end up reacting to every deppy video under the sun because the phandom comes back for more.

Yeah and most of them are just people watching the video. I really don't see a point to them unless they plan to analyse it or something and even if they are analysing it, they don't need to show the video, they can just talk about it. It's just using other people's work for views.CallMeAyana wrote:Too bad for them, though. We're not as dehydrated as we were when Deppy was on tour.
Also... this. Why are reaction channels even a thing? Like... why would anyone want to watch that? It's like let's plays and walkthroughs (only that those two are waaaaaaay better) - you tend to watch the actual video/game instead of the one reacting/playing. You know what I mean? Your attention is taken by the bigger screen, which is, most of the time, the actual video, so... Also, if not, you also want to see what they're reacting to, so you tend to watch the actual video instead (and after watching it, you realize that you actually just watched what they reacted to, not the one who reacted). So... yeah. People should just watch the actual video.malday wrote:Worst than clickbaiters are the professional reactors that turn into professional deppy reactors.
You know the ones that end up reacting to every deppy video under the sun because the phandom comes back for more.
Clearly Phil got his priorities right.SexyTrashCan wrote:Oh Phil.
Tweet for reference: He also says Queen's dogs>Queen herself. Obviously
Depends on what you define as the "phandom" - I mean, even saying it aloud, I feel shame, and I picture the loud embarrassing vocal entity rather than funny, creative individuals with interests in common. I feel it'd be hypocritical to think I'm "different" from or "better" than them. I've read fanfiction about two real guys, gone on YT odysseys, read timelines, replied to them on Twitter, gone swimming in Phil's eyes...flurry wrote:Also hello delurkers! I dunno - I've been watching Dan and Phil for years and I'mdefinitely their fan but I don't feel at all like I'm part of the "phandom"? By "phandom" I mean the screaming girls with their whiskers and who tweet them endlessly. Maybe it is possible to be a fan of theirs without being a part of this giant frankly a bit frightening group (which is really a vocal minority that ends up being the general yardstick for everyone else I think).
Personally I also don't watch their liveshows "live" because of this - I find the chat really cringeworthy sometimes and it's quite uncomfortable seeing students who stayed awake till like 4am to watch them - or say things like they're watching them in class/in church etc etc. I just ... feel it's rather unhealthy. And the liveshow chat asks such weird things These are just my opinions though! I don't want to seem like we condescend the "phandom" because I think people can do whatever they want at the stage of life they're at and it's okay! Just that uh I don't really consider myself part of that.
flurry
delia smith’s placenta
I'm sorry for not adding anything more to this as I'm on my phone and working, but thanks for this post. It's fine to criticize certain behaviours/people for specific things, but the dismissiveness toward a general group is basically the fandom equivalent of that pretty toxic "I'm not like those other girls" mindset some women take to fit in with the dudes that put those other girls down. Maybe that's a stretch but it just feels like that same attitude, and that never does anybody any favours. "I'm not part of the phandom" doesn't really mean anything if you're on this forum lol. "the phandom" is just a name for "people who are fans of dan and phil" and like any large group it has its share of awful people too, but why let them define the full group (or allow other people to do so and agree with it)? anyway that's my non-contribution for now.lurker wrote:kind of ot by now, but with some recent posts commenting on alligning with the "phandom" or not, i've been thinking back to the discussion of dan vs. dismissing his female audience. i think it's interesting that while many of us feel uncomfortable/disappointed in him with regards to some aspects of this, at the same time many of us (me included) are sometimes quick to dismiss the vocal/loud/"cringey" part of the phandom as "teenage phangirls". and of course there's a basis for this; audience statistics, demographics, tumblr bios, and footage from events like tatinof show that it's a somewhat safe guess to assume. it's also obvious that an older audience such as the majority (i think?) on here will tend to have a different "viewer-creator relationship" than a group that's 5-25-ish years younger. but i can't help but feel that being dismissive of the younger, mostly female part of the audience within the older audience comes from a very similar place where dan apparently craves validation from an older, male audience, and i feel like it's important to realize that there's nothing inherently "better" or, say, more "intellectual" in being an adult watching deppy as escapism/for the discussion/for entertainment than being, say, a 15 year-old girl who watches dan because he's her "celebrity crush" and she thinks he's hot.
(not talking about people who are actually being rude etc., also not directed at anyone specifically, i'm including myself in this and i'd just like to hear opinions on this if anyone is down to discuss this topic)
Yep! I agree with you! I think it's important to acknowledge (for myself too) that feeling not part of the typical "phans" category doesn't make a person better or worse, just different - a neutral difference, because afterall as you rightly pointed out, people behave differently at various stages of life and they have different perspectives on celebrity/internet culture etc. too. It's okay to be all screamy and excited and vocal and fan-ish - just that for myself, I was never really into that so much - and that's alright toolurker wrote: it's also obvious that an older audience such as the majority (i think?) on here will tend to have a different "viewer-creator relationship" than a group that's 5-25-ish years younger. but i can't help but feel that being dismissive of the younger, mostly female part of the audience within the older audience comes from a very similar place where dan apparently craves validation from an older, male audience, and i feel like it's important to realize that there's nothing inherently "better" or, say, more "intellectual" in being an adult watching deppy as escapism/for the discussion/for entertainment than being, say, a 15 year-old girl who watches dan because he's her "celebrity crush" and she thinks he's hot.
(not talking about people who are actually being rude etc., also not directed at anyone specifically, i'm including myself in this and i'd just like to hear opinions on this if anyone is down to discuss this topic)
Haha sorry, I realised my mistake after posting. I think I had a point I wanted to make there somewhere and got lost. Like alwaysflurry wrote:thephandommenace I do watch their liveshows - just not "live" haha
