Dan & Phil Part 46: Some kind of a gay backstory

Our two favourite full time internet nerds who never go outside!
Locked
User avatar
captainspacecoat
stress mushroom
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 2:31 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Australia

coffeepenguin wrote:
They can still pretend they have two separate bedrooms without selling the set as one? We know for a fact they are capable of not showing something if they put their mind to it (like cracks in their old apartment). Idk man, this room is not the same as the old one, embrace the change is what I'm saying?
But wouldn't that effectively be the same thing? I think the problem here is thinking of his bedroom as a set: yes, it's a filming space but I also wouldn't be surprised if he does legitimately use that room as a place to hang out when he needs time to himself and even sleeps there sometimes. I believe that for all intents and purposes that is 'Phil's bedroom', as in a room that is his and not Dan's that he can retreat to at times, but it's so small that I highly doubt he actually sleeps there regularly. Assuming their new place has a large master bedroom and several small bedrooms, then this was genuinely their only option. In their last apartment there were two similar sized bedrooms, which I guess made the two-bedroom thing more believable, but this time around I'd guess that this was the only room available for him to use.

tldr; calling this room a 'set' is maybe too simplistic as I do think he will use this room sometimes, and I still think this was their only option other than admitting they sleep in the same room (which they may very well not do, but I think is likely).

re: weight talk - pleeeeaaaasssee can we not do this again. It literally does not matter at all if Dan is looking a bit "soft", let him live. I swear just a few pages ago we were talking about how Dan is potentially insecure about his looks/weight, so why are we now making negative comments about his weight? I know it's not my place to police what we talk about on here, but I just think it's so unnecessary to talk about their weight as weight does not necessarily = health, I'm sure lots of people reading here are also insecure about their weight, and it is really no one's place to make judgments on d or p's weight. They'd look fab whether they're soft or toned or neither
User avatar
loonyradish
living flop
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 1:45 pm

About #bedgate:
Did anyone yet compare the bedding in the ASMR-video and the recent future-telling-video? Because I was curious if it lays in the same position in both videos. The left pillow has been moved, but take a look at this:
ASMR:Image
Predicting Future with Dan:Image

The pillow on the right and the edge of the blanket that is not covered by Phil look pretty much the same. It seems like someone might've sat on the spot, but it doesn't look like the blanket has been used and rearranged afterwards. Also, in the first picture the line between the coloured squares on the pillow and the line on the blanket show in the same direction; they still do in the second picture. If the blanket had been used and afterwards tidied, I think that may not have been the case?

I hope this makes sense because I'm terrible at explaining things
LtrllySusan
lava lamp
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 4:09 pm

loonyradish , I had made the exact same observation, but I wasn't sure if I was comfortable posting it. Nothing against you of course! I am just a bit special in that regard. never watched voldy either or read in-depth about it cause it makes me uncomfortable...

But now that you posted it... His tripod position is also 99% the same in the two videos. Compared to videos from earlier, the perspective changed quite a bit every time. The videos can't have been filmed on the same day cause it looks like he got a haircut in between.
User avatar
flarequake
not an airport stalker
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:55 pm
Pronouns: She/her
Location: London, UK

Re weight comments, I guess this refers to his tweet and/or the Squish nickname? He mentioned not having a six pack, so the conversation responded to it. It rolls back around to everything else old too, there are new people here all the time who want to discuss things, it's what we do. I get that calling him Squish can sound unkind, I think it's meant to be affectionate and not judgmental or about his weight at all. I guess just being descriptive makes it less nice, but
User avatar
loonyradish
living flop
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon May 08, 2017 1:45 pm

LtrllySusan wrote:loonyradish , I had made the exact same observation, but I wasn't sure if I was comfortable posting it. Nothing against you of course! I am just a bit special in that regard. never watched voldy either or read in-depth about it cause it makes me uncomfortable...

But now that you posted it... His tripod position is also 99% the same in the two videos. Compared to videos from earlier, the perspective changed quite a bit every time. The videos can't have been filmed on the same day cause it looks like he got a haircut in between.
Glad you noticed it, too! I wasn't sure about posting it either, but then I thought if we're discussing the reflection in the magic 8-ball, there's no difference to examining the bedding

Good point with the haircut, haven't catched that!
thephandommenace
procrastinator
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:31 pm
Pronouns: they/them
Location: UK

flarequake I think someone mentioned Dan getting softer a few comments back, rather than it being about calling him Squish (edit: oops I think you already mentioned that in your comment, I can't read) (and I've always thought of Squish referring to his dimple, or cuddly aura) I personally love soft!Dan the most, but it doesn't really matter what I think, if he wants to work out then that's his choice, and good luck to him. captainspacecoat I was also just thinking about health =/= weight/shape. I'm not really at my ideal health level right now so I can't speak for right this moment but even when I'm eating well/exercising regularly, I'm always on the thicc soft side, and that is A-OK with me :thumb: but people will still shame people for being big and then claim it's because they're concerned about their health.
User avatar
coffeepenguin
rainbow nerd
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:27 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: France

captainspacecoat wrote:
coffeepenguin wrote:
They can still pretend they have two separate bedrooms without selling the set as one? We know for a fact they are capable of not showing something if they put their mind to it (like cracks in their old apartment). Idk man, this room is not the same as the old one, embrace the change is what I'm saying?
But wouldn't that effectively be the same thing? I think the problem here is thinking of his bedroom as a set: yes, it's a filming space but I also wouldn't be surprised if he does legitimately use that room as a place to hang out when he needs time to himself and even sleeps there sometimes. I believe that for all intents and purposes that is 'Phil's bedroom', as in a room that is his and not Dan's that he can retreat to at times, but it's so small that I highly doubt he actually sleeps there regularly. Assuming their new place has a large master bedroom and several small bedrooms, then this was genuinely their only option. In their last apartment there were two similar sized bedrooms, which I guess made the two-bedroom thing more believable, but this time around I'd guess that this was the only room available for him to use.

tldr; calling this room a 'set' is maybe too simplistic as I do think he will use this room sometimes, and I still think this was their only option other than admitting they sleep in the same room (which they may very well not do, but I think is likely).
I don't doubt Phil might sleep in a room he calls his bedroom, I'm not very comfortable with discussing their actual sleeping arrangements, what's bothering me is calling the room exactly the same as the old one. He could've said, for example, "this room is obviously smaller, but we now have STORAGE!!!!11 and several bedrooms, which is great for when our friends come to visit and don't need to sleep on the sofa anymore, and Dan sleeps on another floor, so I don't have to listen to him marching in his room at night, btw I changed some of my furniture, because whatever". Why this narrative of it being exactly the same room? (I'm sorry, I don't want to be doing this, but I'm doing it for some reason, I don't really understand why I'm having such a strong reaction, I honestly don't care in what room(s) they actually sleep)
Dan wants to be understood. Phil just wants to make the viewer smile and sell some backpacks (c) fancybum
User avatar
sugar
eclipse shirt
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:21 am
Pronouns: they/them
Location: philly

captainspacecoat wrote:re: weight talk - pleeeeaaaasssee can we not do this again. It literally does not matter at all if Dan is looking a bit "soft", let him live. I swear just a few pages ago we were talking about how Dan is potentially insecure about his looks/weight, so why are we now making negative comments about his weight? I know it's not my place to police what we talk about on here, but I just think it's so unnecessary to talk about their weight as weight does not necessarily = health, I'm sure lots of people reading here are also insecure about their weight, and it is really no one's place to make judgments on d or p's weight. They'd look fab whether they're soft or toned or neither
agreed. i do get the impression. especially recently, that dan has some insecurities about his stomach. i don't think he looks at all unhealthy, just maybe he's gained a bit of weight because he's happier and he's no longer super skinny. he and phil are both stil thin, and i think dan looks great.

that comment bothered me bacause 1) i don't think personally that dan needs to lose any weight and 2) i struggle with my weight myself and i'm sure others on here might as wel, and to read that about someone that i think looks good sort of leads me into self deprecating thoughts about my own appearance.

maybe if people feel the need to discuss weight in the future it should be put under a trigger warning.

edit:

these comments were not about referring to him as squish it was about this comment:
capybantsa wrote:I don't care about a rippling six pack, but I think it would be good if Dan got more fit. He's looking very soft these days and I'm a little worried about his health, especially with the accumulation of visceral fat, which is the most dangerous kind. He's hit the wall of youth the last few years and his body is going to start betraying him if he doesn't develop healthy lifestyle habits. Plus if he gets more fit maybe it'll help him feel more secure, which would be very good.
Image
hiddenwombat
pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:39 am
Location: on top of the cabinets

loonyradish wrote:About #bedgate:
Did anyone yet compare the bedding in the ASMR-video and the recent future-telling-video? Because I was curious if it lays in the same position in both videos. The left pillow has been moved, but take a look at this:
ASMR:Image
Predicting Future with Dan:Image

The pillow on the right and the edge of the blanket that is not covered by Phil look pretty much the same. It seems like someone might've sat on the spot, but it doesn't look like the blanket has been used and rearranged afterwards. Also, in the first picture the line between the coloured squares on the pillow and the line on the blanket show in the same direction; they still do in the second picture. If the blanket had been used and afterwards tidied, I think that may not have been the case?

I hope this makes sense because I'm terrible at explaining things
the fact that the duvet cover is on UPSIDE DOWN is driving me insane. who can sleep with the snap button side by their face?! who doesnt realise they put the blanket on the bed that way??? i'm mad
Image
User avatar
captainspacecoat
stress mushroom
Posts: 605
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 2:31 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Australia

awsugar wrote:
agreed. i do get the impression. especially recently, that dan has some insecurities about his stomach. i don't think he looks at all unhealthy, just maybe he's gained a bit of weight because he's happier and he's no longer super skinny. he and phil are both stil thin, and i think dan looks great.

that comment bothered me bacause 1) i don't think personally that dan needs to lose any weight and 2) i struggle with my weight myself and i'm sure others on here might as wel, and to read that about someone that i think looks good sort of leads me into self deprecating thoughts about my own appearance.

maybe if people feel the need to discuss weight in the future it should be put under a trigger warning.

edit:

these comments were not about referring to him as squish it was about this comment:
capybantsa wrote:I don't care about a rippling six pack, but I think it would be good if Dan got more fit. He's looking very soft these days and I'm a little worried about his health, especially with the accumulation of visceral fat, which is the most dangerous kind. He's hit the wall of youth the last few years and his body is going to start betraying him if he doesn't develop healthy lifestyle habits. Plus if he gets more fit maybe it'll help him feel more secure, which would be very good.
Yup, I feel exactly the same about my weight, it's a real struggle and reading those sorts of comments can honestly be such a downer. And yeah, I definitely wasn't talking about the squish comments (I think that's cute actually, and I don't associate 'squish' with weight but rather with someone being adorable and wanting to squish their cheeks or something - it has a positive connotation to me). It's more about the speculation re: their eating habits and suggesting they should exercise more and expressing concern about their weight - that feels inappropriate to me and just so so so boring. I feel like dnp's weight is none of our concern, and weight doesn't necessarily have anything to do with health. Dan and Phil (and everyone) are pretty damn great regardless of weight as far as I'm concerned!

And coffeepenguin, you raise a fair point! I guess I don't really see it that way personally, but I get where you're coming from
phanofcats
delia smith
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:54 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: England

hiddenwombat wrote:
loonyradish wrote:About #bedgate:
Did anyone yet compare the bedding in the ASMR-video and the recent future-telling-video? Because I was curious if it lays in the same position in both videos. The left pillow has been moved, but take a look at this:
ASMR:Image
Predicting Future with Dan:Image

The pillow on the right and the edge of the blanket that is not covered by Phil look pretty much the same. It seems like someone might've sat on the spot, but it doesn't look like the blanket has been used and rearranged afterwards. Also, in the first picture the line between the coloured squares on the pillow and the line on the blanket show in the same direction; they still do in the second picture. If the blanket had been used and afterwards tidied, I think that may not have been the case?

I hope this makes sense because I'm terrible at explaining things
the fact that the duvet cover is on UPSIDE DOWN is driving me insane. who can sleep with the snap button side by their face?! who doesnt realise they put the blanket on the bed that way??? i'm mad
This is a really good observation! It doesn't look like the bed has been used at all, the two screenshots look like they could've been from the same video. I was going to play devils advocate and say they could've been filmed on the same day, but his hair does look shorter in the newest video. It would be quite hard to get it lined up exactly the same so it seems like the bed hasn't been slept in.

I can't tell for sure if it looks upside down, but if it is, nobody could sleep with the button side at the top! Uncomfortable!
User avatar
flarequake
not an airport stalker
Posts: 2681
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:55 pm
Pronouns: She/her
Location: London, UK

Ah, I see, I'd forgotten that. I have a love-hate relationship with my own weight, depending on how clothes fit I sometimes think I look good, but it needs to go for a few health reasons and not loving the look of it, right now I just need to get organised.

It hadn't occurred to me that Phil could have said something different like that about his room, those sound reasonable and just describe it better. It's nice to see the space around everything in his older videos and tbh I just preferred the old furniture. I like this new bed, I was wondering if the strip around the edge is a bit of mirror glass reflecting the colours of the duvet. My duvet often turns around so I end up with the buttons by my head, I don't mind it, though the loose edge when it turns sideways gets on my nerves.
Last edited by flarequake on Mon May 22, 2017 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
alittledizzy
actual demon phannie
actual demon phannie
Posts: 7106
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
Pronouns: she/her

hiddenwombat wrote: the fact that the duvet cover is on UPSIDE DOWN is driving me insane. who can sleep with the snap button side by their face?! who doesnt realise they put the blanket on the bed that way??? i'm mad
someone who isn't actually sleeping in the bed. heh.

Pillow/duvet placement detectives: you are doing good work there. Idk why it didn't even occur to me to look at those.

On Phil calling it the same room: I wasn't taking it quite so literally as Phil trying to tell us nothing changed. I figured he was just repeated for new people that yes despite the fact that the duvet is the same, the walls are the same color with the same paintings, the dresser and bedside table are in the same positions, still with knickknacks, that they did move and it is a different room. If Phil were a youtuber I only casually watched main channel videos for once or twice a month I'm not sure I'd immediately realize that room as a new one. When they're talking about things like that, a lot of the time they're distilling it down for the most casual audience - even though the least casual audience has all the info and more.
User avatar
Birdie
blobfish
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 8:22 pm
Pronouns: they/them

The whole bedroom thing is confusing me so much. I totally get why some of you (lol, most of you really) think it’s a set, your arguments are plausible. But I’m reluctant to believe it because it seems so sneaky and such a weird thing to do. It doesn’t make sense to me either. If they do in fact share a bedroom that they’ll never show us then what’s the point in having another sloppily set up bedroom as a set for Phil? Like, they know a big part of their fandom overanalyses stuff like that and will figure out something’s fishy right away since we never get to see Dan’s bedroom. So the beardroom, if that’s what it is, is a really flimsy lie and I think they could do better and have done better at hiding things in the past.

What’s making me doubt the beardroom theory is basically just the effort they must’ve put into the whole thing. If they don’t want to show Phil’s real bedroom (be it Dan’s or another separate bedroom, whatever), why not just have him film in the living room like Dan does? Why this sloppy set bedroom that most of the fans will see through right away? It might be a guest bedroom that Phil uses as a set – that would make sense to me in fact, but I still feel like lying about it being Phil’s real bedroom is the weirdest thing they’ve ever done – if that’s in fact what they’re doing. The whole thing is just really weird and I don’t know what to think about it anymore. But if the room is really as small as it seems to be I agree with you, there’s no way it’s Phil’s actual bedroom.

I don’t get the point of lying about it though. I’m pretty sure we would all have been okay with “This is our guest room that I film in because I’m not comfortable with filming in my real bedroom anymore” and it would have sparked way less phan suspicion than what they’re doing now. Unless of course that’s Phil’s real bedroom after all and we’re just super paranoid about everything. :? I’m stumped, really. I don’t really think I have an opinion on this because it’s too confusing.

I'm also not sure if I find this discussion invasive or not but here I am participating in it anyway.
User avatar
adequate duck
cheeky #spon
Posts: 219
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:49 am
Pronouns: she/they
Location: Australia

can we not with the weight talk? look, you absolutely cannot with 100% certainty judge another person's health by looking at them, in fact, the only thing you may be able to judge by looking at their size is their waist measurement. blah blah blah health yeah i get it we're all worried about health, but rarely does anyone express concern about a random person's health except by talking about their weight. i mean yeah i know it's deppy and we're all talking about everything to do with them, and i am not saying we can't discuss how they look...

and please, if you're not happy with your weight, let me tell you how i stopped struggling with my weight ;) - i stopped listening to those in society that tell me a woman is only worth any kind of value if she is acceptably thin, i stopped buying into the hollywood ideal and started reading blogs by actual real people sharing their reality. some were conventionally pretty and thin and others not, but once you start being exposed to a range of people it normalises the actual real range of body shapes and sizes.

this rant brought to you by someone who took a really long time to get there and wants other people to not have to deal with this shizz as long as they did
"don't respect any ducks" - phil lester
User avatar
sugar
eclipse shirt
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:21 am
Pronouns: they/them
Location: philly

Katka wrote:The whole bedroom thing is confusing me so much. I totally get why some of you (lol, most of you really) think it’s a set, your arguments are plausible. But I’m reluctant to believe it because it seems so sneaky and such a weird thing to do. It doesn’t make sense to me either. If they do in fact share a bedroom that they’ll never show us then what’s the point in having another sloppily set up bedroom as a set for Phil? Like, they know a big part of their fandom overanalyses stuff like that and will figure out something’s fishy right away since we never get to see Dan’s bedroom. So the beardroom, if that’s what it is, is a really flimsy lie and I think they could do better and have done better at hiding things in the past.

What’s making me doubt the beardroom theory is basically just the effort they must’ve put into the whole thing. If they don’t want to show Phil’s real bedroom (be it Dan’s or another separate bedroom, whatever), why not just have him film in the living room like Dan does? Why this sloppy set bedroom that most of the fans will see through right away? It might be a guest bedroom that Phil uses as a set – that would make sense to me in fact, but I still feel like lying about it being Phil’s real bedroom is the weirdest thing they’ve ever done – if that’s in fact what they’re doing. The whole thing is just really weird and I don’t know what to think about it anymore. But if the room is really as small as it seems to be I agree with you, there’s no way it’s Phil’s actual bedroom.

I don’t get the point of lying about it though. I’m pretty sure we would all have been okay with “This is our guest room that I film in because I’m not comfortable with filming in my real bedroom anymore” and it would have sparked way less phan suspicion than what they’re doing now. Unless of course that’s Phil’s real bedroom after all and we’re just super paranoid about everything. :? I’m stumped, really. I don’t really think I have an opinion on this because it’s too confusing.

I'm also not sure if I find this discussion invasive or not but here I am participating in it anyway.
i've been thinking about this and i think maybe phil is just attached to the bedroom as a background for his videos. dan's background change comes with a rebranding which phil is not doing. as he's said, he likes that bedding and feels no need to change it, maybe that extends to the whole background. it also feels just...right for his videos. if ohio started filming in front of a desk i don think it'd fit his personality so i can see why he'd want to keep that even though he may no be sleeping in there anymore.

as for lying about it, i'm not sure. part of me thinks that they're not trying that hard to make it seem like a real room as part of their being more open about stuff thing. they probably know, if it is a set, that we'll draw that conclusion. maybe the 'same bedroom' thing is for casual fans and they're happy to let us interpret the room however we like because they'll never really address it. i doubt we'll ever see the moon room, at least in its entirety. i'm not sure if this al makes sense the way i wanted it to but i think maybe they're just not trying that hard to make it seem like a real bedroom cause they no longer really care what conclusions we draw because we're gping to draw them anyway.
Image
onetruetrash
blobfish
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:35 am

Katka wrote:I don’t get the point of lying about it though. I’m pretty sure we would all have been okay with “This is our guest room that I film in because I’m not comfortable with filming in my real bedroom anymore” and it would have sparked way less phan suspicion than what they’re doing now.
Sorry, but in what world would that be a good idea? That would literally be the worst thing to do if they really are sharing a bedroom. At least this way only people who are really really into the Phandom would notice. If Phil said that he didn't want to show his bedroom outright, even more casual fans would be suspicious.

Also, even though most of us here would respect that, do you really think that it would be the same everywhere else? The crazy phans would lose their marbles.

While it is an obvious lie, it's enough to keep suspicion at bay for the most part.
User avatar
sapienveneficus
rainbow nerd
Posts: 229
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 3:22 pm
Location: USA

I'd like to weigh in on Phil's "beardroom" if I may. Here's how I see it: Dan and Phil have spent this year, and the back half of last year, slowly bringing down barriers and being open with their audience in ways they haven't before. I think the Florida trip is a perfect example of their new normal. That said, I still think they feel a great deal of pressure to maintain a sort of status quo for their casual fans. I think Phil, in particular, feels pressure to to keep his bright persona whilst filming from his knickknack-filled bedroom.

Do I think he actually sleeps there? No. There appear to be no objects/furniture beyond the view of the camera, and the space between his bed and chest of drawers is so narrow that he'd literally have to sit on his bed to be able to open a drawer. None of that points to it being a functional bedroom. So, why lie? Because AmazingPhil has always filmed in his bedroom. And, as Phil hasn't rebranded, changing that would be too fundamental of a change. So that rules out having a separate filming space and him telling his audience that he wants to keep his bedroom private. And as neither Dan nor Phil appear to be ready to admit that they share a room, we have the "beardroom."

Writing this out made me think about Dan and Phil's relationship with privacy. A casual viewer might look at their all of their videos, especially the liveshows, and think, "Wow, these two really just put their entire lives on the internet. They must have no privacy!" Whereas more, let's go with, devoted fans actually know that Dan and Phil keep a lot about themselves private. Phil seems more open, talking about his childhood, university days, and family, but he keeps his true self off camera (at least in AmazingPhil videos). He's careful to always keep his emotions in check and rarely touches on anything serious. Dan keeps pretty quiet about friends and family while being emotionally more honest. It's an interesting dynamic. Anyhow, sorry for the rambling, I'm still new at all this.
"Someone, somewhere is into that." Daniel Howell
User avatar
autumnhearth
senpai
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:44 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: OH, USA

First off, I definitely did not mean to start a weight discussion here with the nickname inquiry. Plus size momma here. Advocate of beauty and health at every size. Moving on!
LtrllySusan wrote:The problem is by now they are pretty deep into that whole "This is Phil's actual bedroom" farce that they can't admit it's a set and that he has another separate bedroom. They could have handled it differently from the start, but maybe they weren't aware how hard it would be to make a guestroom look like a bedroom that someone actually lives in. So when they realised the bed was too big to fit next to the drawer and so on, it was already too late to change the story.

[offtopic]Does anyone find the drawer and bed table ... kinda ugly? I think that colour of wood just doesn't worked in a "crammed" setup like this, it's too heavy. But what do I know, I only have IKEA furniture [/offtopic]
I've been thinking about this recently. Like how they might respond to such comments/inquiries in a joint liveshow. I'm 95% they would just ignore those questions but 5% wonders if they might have a cheeky answer. Like Dan saying "Oh you caught him! Phil doesn't sleep in his bedroom because he's actually a robot". Nope. They're just going to ignore it.

I also hate the design and color of the dresser and the side table. I loved the old dresser (that I'm sure would not fit in this room) and wished he had a headboard to match in the old apartment. Now I like the new headboard and want the furniture to match. Though he probably thought white against a white wall wouldn't work. Grrr.

alittledizzy wrote:
hiddenwombat wrote: the fact that the duvet cover is on UPSIDE DOWN is driving me insane. who can sleep with the snap button side by their face?! who doesnt realise they put the blanket on the bed that way??? i'm mad
someone who isn't actually sleeping in the bed. heh.

Pillow/duvet placement detectives: you are doing good work there. Idk why it didn't even occur to me to look at those.

On Phil calling it the same room: I wasn't taking it quite so literally as Phil trying to tell us nothing changed. I figured he was just repeated for new people that yes despite the fact that the duvet is the same, the walls are the same color with the same paintings, the dresser and bedside table are in the same positions, still with knickknacks, that they did move and it is a different room. If Phil were a youtuber I only casually watched main channel videos for once or twice a month I'm not sure I'd immediately realize that room as a new one. When they're talking about things like that, a lot of the time they're distilling it down for the most casual audience - even though the least casual audience has all the info and more.
Great catch with the pillow and duvet folks! Very good point dizzy!
awsugar wrote:
Katka wrote:The whole bedroom thing is confusing me so much. I totally get why some of you (lol, most of you really) think it’s a set, your arguments are plausible. But I’m reluctant to believe it because it seems so sneaky and such a weird thing to do. It doesn’t make sense to me either. If they do in fact share a bedroom that they’ll never show us then what’s the point in having another sloppily set up bedroom as a set for Phil? Like, they know a big part of their fandom overanalyses stuff like that and will figure out something’s fishy right away since we never get to see Dan’s bedroom. So the beardroom, if that’s what it is, is a really flimsy lie and I think they could do better and have done better at hiding things in the past.

What’s making me doubt the beardroom theory is basically just the effort they must’ve put into the whole thing. If they don’t want to show Phil’s real bedroom (be it Dan’s or another separate bedroom, whatever), why not just have him film in the living room like Dan does? Why this sloppy set bedroom that most of the fans will see through right away? It might be a guest bedroom that Phil uses as a set – that would make sense to me in fact, but I still feel like lying about it being Phil’s real bedroom is the weirdest thing they’ve ever done – if that’s in fact what they’re doing. The whole thing is just really weird and I don’t know what to think about it anymore. But if the room is really as small as it seems to be I agree with you, there’s no way it’s Phil’s actual bedroom.

I don’t get the point of lying about it though. I’m pretty sure we would all have been okay with “This is our guest room that I film in because I’m not comfortable with filming in my real bedroom anymore” and it would have sparked way less phan suspicion than what they’re doing now. Unless of course that’s Phil’s real bedroom after all and we’re just super paranoid about everything. :? I’m stumped, really. I don’t really think I have an opinion on this because it’s too confusing.

I'm also not sure if I find this discussion invasive or not but here I am participating in it anyway.
i've been thinking about this and i think maybe phil is just attached to the bedroom as a background for his videos. dan's background change comes with a rebranding which phil is not doing. as he's said, he likes that bedding and feels no need to change it, maybe that extends to the whole background. it also feels just...right for his videos. if phil started filming in front of a desk i don think it'd fit his personality so i can see why he'd want to keep that even though he may no be sleeping in there anymore.

as for lying about it, i'm not sure. part of me thinks that they're not trying that hard to make it seem like a real room as part of their being more open about stuff thing. they probably know, if it is a set, that we'll draw that conclusion. maybe the 'same bedroom' thing is for casual fans and they're happy to let us interpret the room however we like because they'll never really address it. i doubt we'll ever see the moon room, at least in its entirety. i'm not sure if this all makes sense the way i wanted it to but i think maybe they're just not trying that hard to make it seem like a real bedroom cause they no longer really care what conclusions we draw because we're gping to draw them anyway.
Yes! All of this! The bed backdrop is very AmazingPhil. I saw an old video that mentioned when he started filming videos in the lounge of his Manchester flat he got comments that people missed the bed so he returned to filming in front of it (he also had the crazy shapes blanket draped across the sofa for some videos). Strong branding.

One last thought. I would not want to hang out in that room. Sleep maybe (if the bed wasn't so small). But they have two lounges now and I just don't see that bedroom as a retreat. I wonder if they have offices/where they do their editing. (In the gaming room or corners of the lounges?) I would guess that the dresser drawers are full of props.

Please come home boys, we need to see more.

Oh very well said sapienveneficus!
User avatar
opendoor
rainbow nerd
Posts: 230
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:24 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: Australia

sapienveneficus wrote: Writing this out made me think about Dan and Phil's relationship with privacy. A casual viewer might look at their all of their videos, especially the liveshows, and think, "Wow, these two really just put their entire lives on the internet. They must have no privacy!" Whereas more, let's go with, devoted fans actually know that Dan and Phil keep a lot about themselves private. Phil seems more open, talking about his childhood, university days, and family, but he keeps his true self off camera (at least in AmazingPhil videos). He's careful to always keep his emotions in check and rarely touches on anything serious. Dan keeps pretty quiet about friends and family while being emotionally more honest. It's an interesting dynamic. Anyhow, sorry for the rambling, I'm still new at all this.
No, I like this, top-notch ramble. It is interesting that they both value privacy so highly, but differ somewhat on what they want to keep private. I like that we get different types of insight from both of them.
I miss Dan Howell's stupid face.
User avatar
lurker
janice from the shop
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 2:02 pm
Pronouns: they/them

opendoor wrote:
sapienveneficus wrote: Writing this out made me think about Dan and Phil's relationship with privacy. A casual viewer might look at their all of their videos, especially the liveshows, and think, "Wow, these two really just put their entire lives on the internet. They must have no privacy!" Whereas more, let's go with, devoted fans actually know that Dan and Phil keep a lot about themselves private. Phil seems more open, talking about his childhood, university days, and family, but he keeps his true self off camera (at least in AmazingPhil videos). He's careful to always keep his emotions in check and rarely touches on anything serious. Dan keeps pretty quiet about friends and family while being emotionally more honest. It's an interesting dynamic. Anyhow, sorry for the rambling, I'm still new at all this.
No, I like this, top-notch ramble. It is interesting that they both value privacy so highly, but differ somewhat on what they want to keep private. I like that we get different types of insight from both of them.
same! i never thought about it that way. it'd be interesting to take a step back and look at what a casual viewer of only one of their main channels or the gaming channel might know about their lives. but since i started watching both of their channels and dapg pretty simultaneously, i can't really disentangle the information anymore. what crossed my mind, however, was that maybe in hindsight it's actually surprising that phil made the "we're moving out" video? iir, the first move was announced a lot more matter-of-factly, i.e. "i decided to live with dan this year"? i think that's a quote. i'm hearing that in phil's voice. it's what i immediately associated with phil sharing: putting something out there that's maybe surprising for him to share, but without offering explanations or inviting discussions. such as "my parents sold our old house, it was weird, here's an anecdote" or "i wanted to make a video with my mum, so here's my mum". so in that light it's kind of unusual to make a video explaining the move (even though it was still anecdote-style and not super personal except for their suffering due to the drilling). i don't really know where i'm going with this and i'm also currently procrastinating so i'll just leave it at this and see if anyone agrees or disagrees because i have no idea if that thought even makes sense yay
thank's you were great
Lavny
not a first-time poster
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 2:47 pm

Hello, as a longtime lurker on this great group, I finally decided to register and post something, regarding the ongoing room discussions. I haven't completely formed my opinion on the topic. Its a little bit philosophic:

In general the importance of a bedroom is getting lower with time (age). Yeah you still sleep in it, and do other very important stuff ;) , but while your bedroom is your "own kingdom" as long as you live with your parents and getting even more important if you move out for the first time as a student or young adult, there comes a point in live where the whole apartment/house belongs to you. It becomes your home that you've shaped. There is no more need for a big bedroom, where you can work, read, watch movies, or relax in, because there are better places around to do all of this. You've created a "home" - and I have the impression that this is exactly what Dan and Phil did: they created a home. And for me this is completely in line with your "family-theory", and I am a big fan of this theory. Because it doesn't matter if they're romantically involved or not, as family they belong together and can shape their future (and home) as they want.

[offtopic]I think you understand what I meant. This is why I have never posted anything before - I am terribly complicated in expressing my thoughts.[/offtopic]
LtrllySusan
lava lamp
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 4:09 pm

:welcome: I'm also still new and confused about formulating thoughts.

The reason people started discussing the "beardroom" in the first place was because of the drawer placement looking incredibly impractical for everyday use. The fact that the room is also small was just adding on top of that. Of course, what you are saying makes a lot of sense. So if the major argument was that it can't be his room because it's small, it would be invalid after your reasoning. But the major argument is that it looks impractical and unrealistic. Even if you only sleep in there and get your clothes - with that drawer/bed placement, it seems like quite the hassle.
saffarinda
truth bomb
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:01 am
Pronouns: she/her

Completly agree with all the comments about weight - it's not necessary to speculate their health. I've always associated squish with being someone whos cheeks you want to squish, when Dan does the thing where he grins and his eyes crinkle and he just looks so soft and happy - that's what I think of as squish. Nothing weight related

Beardroom - See when we were initally speculating, I quite liked the idea of them having seperate spaces, they're around each other practically 24/7 and have a buisness and regular relationship, seperate, defined spaces seem healthy - somewhere for them to go when they need to recharge, and even somewhere to sleep on their own if they don't fancy sleeping in the same bed that night - but Phil's room just seems... empty. It lacks personal touches and quirks around the room, and definitely appears to just be a set to me - who knows, he may have not just finished unpacking but it seems fairly bare to me rn.

Off-topic: I was doing a revision session with my teacher for my media exam tomorrow, and she said (about some analysis stuff) "Just think of it as Speed" and the first thing that came into my head was "I knew you were gonna make another fucking Speed reference" - that video has me obsessed, I love domestic bants.
25/04/2017 - #blessed
VengefulBlue
rainbow nerd
Posts: 239
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:59 am
Pronouns: they/them

Lavny wrote:There is no more need for a big bedroom, where you can work, read, watch movies, or relax in, because there are better places around to do all of this.
i kind of disagree that there's no need for a big bedroom, in general. in their specific flat, yes, because they have extra rooms (2 lounges, dan's corner, gaming room, etc).

but in general, i think it makes sense for people to want their own separate rooms to hide out in, so to speak. living+working with your life/romantic/whatever partner must be terribly draining.

but in phil's case, i can't see that room even being functional as a place to sleep and keep his clothes. he's 6'2" and he bought a bed that's literally 2 inches longer than he is. that doesn't sound comfortable at all. not to mention, as others have said, that the dresser looks too close to open.
Lavny wrote:it doesn't matter if they're romantically involved or not, as family they belong together and can shape their future (and home) as they want.
i do love this though!
Locked

Return to “Daniel Howell & Phil Lester”