Also;
when uploading the photos I got this captcha, too true phil
Having darker eyebrows would take away from the stark contrast between his paleness and his dark hair, so basically he will look like a cartoon character.papierklemmen wrote:can someone please tell phil that you can, in fact, also dye your eyebrows? i mean, if he's so committed to having black hair, the least he could do is match his eyebrows with it...
That article was interesting. But it really kind of paints deppy in a bad light. Saying they left for the money they could make on tour is probably not true. The opportunity and adventure of a world tour and the gift it was to so many of their fans was probably just as much of a factor as the money. Dan has always said youtube was his priority.SquishPhan wrote:I'm hoping for a quiff, but really like how black hair looks on Phil so I hope he keeps that.
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-40431793
Reading this article makes me think that it was 's choice to leave the radio.
This is very interesting, although it makes them look like they are just about the money! I wonder what really happened with Radio 1...was it that the BBC couldn't come up with enough cash to keep them?SquishPhan wrote:I'm hoping for a quiff, but really like how black hair looks on Phil so I hope he keeps that.
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-40431793
Reading this article makes me think that it was 's choice to leave the radio.
Now that I think about it, I'll admit you are actually right despite anything I might have said about Phil's hair earlier.malday wrote:Now that this has been chosen as the thread title, i'm going to commit blasphemy and say: the fringe suits him more than an actual quiff.
A side swept fringe looks best on his face shape, he just needs to abandon the straighteners and give it some volume.(and maybe let his shaved sides go his natural color)
Keeping the fringe has the added bonus of being able to play different characters in skits just by pushing it back.
Thanks for linking this!SquishPhan wrote: http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-40431793
Reading this article makes me think that it was 's choice to leave the radio.
lol. Jobs are about making money, so going off to make more somewhere else isn't a character flaw, but the way that's phrased sounds kind of bitter? Though I guess it's better to be the dumper than the dumpee and this makes it sound pretty definitively like D&P were the dumpers. Still about everybody calling it a hiatus though instead of just ripping off the bandaid. And WAS it their own actual idea to cut their own schedules down to one hour once a month? Because R1 can't really be tetchy about them leaving if they (BBC) were already fucking with their (D&P) schedules and income.Cooper says: "We've looked at YouTubers, people like Dan & Phil, but they get tempted by huge amounts of money and go off on world tours around America and Australia."
We may well see more vloggers hired to present on the station in the future, but it's likely the publicly-funded Radio 1 will struggle to compete with the money that YouTubers can make from lucrative merchandising and endorsement deals.
Thanks for sharing this, Squish!SquishPhan wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-40431793
Reading this article makes me think that it was 's choice to leave the radio.
Ok sure,'money this, money that' but can you really put a price on the constant opportunity to awkwardly touch hot celebrities/musicians? I think in that respect D&P were being a lil shortsighted and the potential for memes has suffered greatly as a result.alittledizzy wrote:If I had to make a guess I'd say it was Dan and Phil's choice to walk away from the weekly show, the BBC's choice to end the monthly one when the other weeks of Internet Takeover weren't performing.
But I still don't blame them for stepping back. Maintaining a weekly three hour radio show would never have allowed them to do the book or the tour, and would have continued to tether them to one location and restrict their time for other projects. I don't know if Dan and Phil just didn't want that, or they weren't compensated enough for that - but either way, as much as I wish the radio show still existed, I hold no grudge against them.
Too true. There is no amount of money than can equal the unique experience of Ariana dandruff touching their skin molecules. I need to rethink my perspective.fancybum wrote:Ok sure,'money this, money that' but can you really put a price on the constant opportunity to awkwardly touch hot celebrities/musicians? I think in that respect D&P were being a lil shortsighted and the potential for memes has suffered greatly as a result.alittledizzy wrote:If I had to make a guess I'd say it was Dan and Phil's choice to walk away from the weekly show, the BBC's choice to end the monthly one when the other weeks of Internet Takeover weren't performing.
But I still don't blame them for stepping back. Maintaining a weekly three hour radio show would never have allowed them to do the book or the tour, and would have continued to tether them to one location and restrict their time for other projects. I don't know if Dan and Phil just didn't want that, or they weren't compensated enough for that - but either way, as much as I wish the radio show still existed, I hold no grudge against them.
fancybum wrote: Ok sure,'money this, money that' but can you really put a price on the constant opportunity to awkwardly touch hot celebrities/musicians? I think in that respect D&P were being a lil shortsighted and the potential for memes has suffered greatly as a result.