THIS IS A PSA TO GO AND VISIT BALLCLASH.COM
edit: I don't even care if this is top of the page, it makes it better
I had a feeling it was only a matter of time until this happened after the golf vidsparkle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:06 pm LADS LADS LADS
THIS IS A PSA TO GO AND VISIT BALLCLASH.COM
edit: I don't even care if this is top of the page, it makes it better![]()
Phil, he is very intriguing and much more mysterious than Dan as his AP persona seems a lot different from Phil than the DINOF persona from Dan. I also think it's very impressive how he handles the business stuff, Dan seems a bit embarrassed by merch plugs and losing integrity and Phil doesn't seem to care at all, even joking about having no integrity on his channel. And to be superficial: I am more attracted to him, he looks very unique and beautiful, I mean, have you seen that man's face?
Never shared it, never seen it, never plan on doing either.gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 2. How many times have you shared Lord Voldemort's best phan edit of all?
I'd love to see something else from them but I am also quite happy with their content atm. I'd love for Phil to do something with his creativity or them doing something together that isn't tied to their YouTube channels. Something a lot more professional and different from what they've done so far would be amazing. Direct that horror movie, Phil!gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 3. Do you like the dipper brothers being on Youtube or not? Do you ever want them to do more.... or less?![]()
Well, they are out in my opinion, though in Phil's case I understand that many people would not know about it. Dan has made it very obvious though and it's tiring to see that people still think he is in the closet or something. I think in their case confirming a relationship would be a bigger deal than being out, which is quite rare, I think. And I am not going into the whole shipbaiting thing because it almost always ends in a queerbaiting discussiongohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 4. If Dantru and Phollum came out separately disclosing non-straight sexualities, but not as being a couple, what would you think? Would you say that coming out as being in a gay couple is a bigger deal than coming out as non straight, or would you get annoyed and say that they're ship baiting etc.?
Not really. I searched for their old flat on listings because I was curious how it was advertised but since they didn't live there anymore at the time and the photos were shared by Phil before, I don't think it really counts as stalking. It's definitely the most stalking I've ever done. I don't remember accidentally coming across something either.gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 5. Have you ever stalked too far and found stuff that you shouldn't have? (Not talking about voldy here, other stuff such as addresses or full names etc.)
Dan: he can be so obnoxious and I really hate when he screams like a bansheegohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 6. Most annoying thing about Danetrius and most annoying thing about Philesphical, go.
I am 19gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm 7. What's the average age on this site? (This is just me asking generally lmao, there must be a lot of people my age and younger but it seems they're the quiet and inactive minority/majority)
1. I hate them both. but Phil.
AMAZING. I checked last night immediately to see if they bought it and was surprised to find they didn't. This is great!sparkle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:06 pm LADS LADS LADS
THIS IS A PSA TO GO AND VISIT BALLCLASH.COM
edit: I don't even care if this is top of the page, it makes it better![]()
Hmm, my question answers. In advance i'm sorry for number 2 and 5.gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:13 pm [Offtopic]
:twisted: So, hey, guys, I'm in the mood to ask some uncomfortable questions, just because I'm seeing a lot of mixed opinions recently and wanna know where we all stand: :twisted: Be honest or idk, answer it with alternate facts but you do you![]()
I really like this questions gohomohowell!
This is totally me getting my own personal shit all over your post so feel free to ignore, but I sometimes feel like literally any time Dan mentions something that isn't mainstream people love to call him ~pretentious~ and it gets under my skin so bad. Because I, well I don't read philosophy anymore. But I used to read queer theory, and listen to less well-known bands, and think about politics and I don't think just talking about shit that's interesting doesn't automatically equal being pretentious?citizen_erased wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:09 pm
6. Most annoying thing about Danetrius and most annoying thing about Philesphical, go.
Dan: well he's a pretentious one isn't he. Sometimes all the "look at me reading ~~philosophy~~ and thinking about politics" really bugs me, but then I read philosophy and think about politics so honestly I'm equally pretentious and shouldn't complain![]()
....[/size]
Phil. I love Dan with my heart, I relate to him a lot - I think we'd be great friends in real life, it seems like we have the same kind of humor and taste in most things. Which is why I think I'm so so drawn to Phil. There's just something about him that fascinates me, I find his mind brilliant and quirky and I'd love to have a serious conversations with him. It also helps that I'm so incredibly attracted to him, the man has the kind of beauty that once you see you can't ever not think about it
Never shared it. I found it late, around 2014, when I still thought most of the shipping was just..shipping. Watching it changed my entire perspective. And I felt so bad after, like I had intruded something too personal.2. How many times have you shared Lord Voldemort's best phan edit of all?
I'm happy with them being on Youtube, I wouldn't mind if they ever released that super serious super real documentary about their story3. Do you like the dipper brothers being on Youtube or not? Do you ever want them to do more.... or less?![]()
As someone who is fan of Superfruit, who shipbait A LOT, I can honestly say Iìve never, not once, thought Dip and Pip shipbait. So if they ever came out without mentioning being together, I'd be very surprised, but not upset. I think neither of them really likes labels though, and I'd think in their case it'd be way more powerful to come out as a couple - confirming their non.straightness - than anything else.4. If Dantru and Phollum came out separately disclosing non-straight sexualities, but not as being a couple, what would you think? Would you say that coming out as being in a gay couple is a bigger deal than coming out as non straight, or would you get annoyed and say that they're ship baiting etc.?
I don't think so, no. And, sorry, I tried. I'm that kind of nosy person, what can I say. Sorry5. Have you ever stalked too far and found stuff that you shouldn't have? (Not talking about voldy here, other stuff such as addresses or full names etc.)
Sometimes the dinof persona is a bit too much for me to handle, and there are videos from the past especially where I find myself rolling my eyes at Dan. Not recently I gotta say.6. Most annoying thing about Danetrius and most annoying thing about Philesphical, go.
Lol, this was not what I expected, but I liked it nonetheless.sparkle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:06 pm LADS LADS LADS
THIS IS A PSA TO GO AND VISIT BALLCLASH.COM
edit: I don't even care if this is top of the page, it makes it better![]()
I just want to clarify I didnt buy the website! I was just watching it with somethingsketchy and wrote it down because it made me laugh, and then we discovered some utter ledge had bought the domain
Hmm, I do get your point. And yes he's a pretentious assholequeerofcups wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:43 pmThis is totally me getting my own personal shit all over your post so feel free to ignore, but I sometimes feel like literally any time Dan mentions something that isn't mainstream people love to call him ~pretentious~ and it gets under my skin so bad. Because I, well I don't read philosophy anymore. But I used to read queer theory, and listen to less well-known bands, and think about politics and I don't think just talking about shit that's interesting doesn't automatically equal being pretentious?citizen_erased wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:09 pm
6. Most annoying thing about Danetrius and most annoying thing about Philesphical, go.
Dan: well he's a pretentious one isn't he. Sometimes all the "look at me reading ~~philosophy~~ and thinking about politics" really bugs me, but then I read philosophy and think about politics so honestly I'm equally pretentious and shouldn't complain![]()
....[/size]
like, don't get me wrong, Dipthong is totally a pretentious asshole (though i think he's toned it down in the last year) but sometimes he's...literally just talking about shit that he likes and people are still like ohhhhh my gooood so preteeeeentious.
the Dan-focus is just the usual thing that typically happens when it comes to the phandom, sadly. I wish the guys would receive equal amounts of appreciation and attention, because honestly, they both deserve it and both are equals. it's just I suppose Dan says so much shit and Phil.. Phil tends to get over-looked and unfairly ignored. some of it has to do with the fact that dangirls existgohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:38 pmIt's weird, though. Despite many people claiming they prefer Phil, I think we can all agree that there's a bit of focus on Dan on here. You know, we talk about his mental health a lot more than Phil's just as we talk more about his family than Phil's. Thoughts?

I think, as it was once put, Dan puts forward a lot more ambiguity. He alludes to something and leaves people stumped. Then people come here to talk about it. However, Phil tends to be quite blatant about things and says things outright, or otherwise completely ignores topics and just doesn't discuss it. Think of Dan as having difficulty disguising emotion and letting things blurt out, while Phil is quite tight-lipped and discreet. However, contrary to what people may suggest, there's actually no mystery to Phil (if you consider his words) but Dan's words hold more interpretation. Phil is also sneaky and says things indirectly and kind of off-hand, therefore going under the radar. You see a lot of people commenting "wait....Phil said WHAT!!!" because they miss him his subtlety and general quietness over Dan being quite loud and dominant in videos.gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:38 pm It's weird, though. Despite many people claiming they prefer Phil, I think we can all agree that there's a bit of focus on Dan on here. You know, we talk about his mental health a lot more than Phil's just as we talk more about his family than Phil's. Thoughts?
Okay so I typed in 'dan howell and' into google after seeing this out of curiosity to see what would pop up. Idk wtf is in my metadata but the top suggestion was 'dan howell and emma blackery fan fiction'.twix wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:13 pm re: Q5: once i was looking for dan and nick jonas crack art so I set out to google "dan howell and nick jonas" and got as far as "dan howell and" before google suggested completing the query with what i can only assume is dan's ex girlfriend's full name.![]()
Google obviously has your numbersparkle wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:35 pmOkay so I typed in 'dan howell and' into google after seeing this out of curiosity to see what would pop up. Idk wtf is in my metadata but the top suggestion was 'dan howell and emma blackery fan fiction'.twix wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:13 pm re: Q5: once i was looking for dan and nick jonas crack art so I set out to google "dan howell and nick jonas" and got as far as "dan howell and" before google suggested completing the query with what i can only assume is dan's ex girlfriend's full name.![]()
thanks google xx
I'm much too tired to say anything complex but can I just say I love love love this entire thing you've written about Phil. I read this with my mouth hanging open and just..yes. I wish I could form a coherent sentence.000dia000 wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:31 pmI think, as it was once put, Dan puts forward a lot more ambiguity. He alludes to something and leaves people stumped. Then people come here to talk about it. However, Phil tends to be quite blatant about things and says things outright, or otherwise completely ignores topics and just doesn't discuss it. Think of Dan as having difficulty disguising emotion and letting things blurt out, while Phil is quite tight-lipped and discreet. However, contrary to what people may suggest, there's actually no mystery to Phil (if you consider his words) but Dan's words hold more interpretation. Phil is also sneaky and says things indirectly and kind of off-hand, therefore going under the radar. You see a lot of people commenting "wait....Phil said WHAT!!!" because they miss him his subtlety and general quietness over Dan being quite loud and dominant in videos.gohomohowell wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 9:38 pm It's weird, though. Despite many people claiming they prefer Phil, I think we can all agree that there's a bit of focus on Dan on here. You know, we talk about his mental health a lot more than Phil's just as we talk more about his family than Phil's. Thoughts?
Dan's a bit dramatic. He doesn't upload regularly, and when he does he hypes it up. He calls for people to get excited, then delivers, and there's the positive and negative fallout. He's over dramatic in his videos. He's loud. He get's people's attention. Phil's sometimes lost underneath it all because he's a lot quieter, calmer, more straight-forward.
Also, while I'm not sure everybody's willing to admit it, but Dan just get's more attention because he's more popular. However, I do think people are more open to criticizing him/commending him than they are for Phil. While Phil does get negative attention, usually someone has to point out how Dan is getting so much negative attention that it finally diverts. Dan videos bring up discussions like sexuality, quality content, mental health, secret projects and the like. Phil's video's are more slice of life, talks about himself or things he does. You learn about what he does and what's flashy and bright, but nothing about Phil as a person. Dan presents topics, open for discussion. But Phil presents a picture, and yet people still sometimes miss what's right in front of them.
Also, people might just more subconsciously like Dan. People might just find that there's more to talk about with Dan, even if they prefer Phil, they might not have anything to say beyond what they like about him or his videos. I usually try to make posts about Phil due to these reasons, and analysis (or even call-outs) of him are usually some of the more interesting topics on this forum because of that. Dan can get a little repetitive sometimes, he's more "exciting" but he sure does go around in circles.
Concerning family and mental health: Phil shows his family more than Dan's, so that self explains how Dan's family remains a "mystery." A lot of what we know about him and his family can be easily accessed through videos or social media, they've appeared in videos, and his own brother helps run a company! Dan, on the other hand, we know so little about him and his family from his videos. Everything else has to be pulled from supah secret tumblr blogs you have to search for, screenshots of an old website, and from speculation of itself. In regards to mental health, that's where things are quite different from them. Dan seems to be open about being upset, about things getting him down, crisis and mood swings. Failure and uncertainty. Phil, on the other hand, we've learned so little. We know that his friend died, that he sometimes has such bad nightmares and wakes up crying, that he's afraid of death and does everything but confront it, and seems to have quite a case of Peter Pan syndrome. Most importantly, we know that a secret video of his, being emotionally open, was dispensed across the internet for everyone to see, and yet so many people made it all about Dan. Why? Because Dan was the one who opened up about it, insisted it was fake, made a tumblr blog in defense of it, and lashed out at people concerning it. Dan was the open "sufferer" and people still make it all about Dan. We honestly don't know a lot about Phil, only that he's private, but that he's emotionally and mentally quite strong. In the recent interview with Sue, Dan expressed how hate comments don't bother Phil, he's passive and let's it get by without it even bothering him. This same Phil once expressed wanting to delete his channel when he got his first hate comment. This same Phil recounted how a bully stabbed him with a compass and then proceeded to shrug it off. That's Phil. He shrugs off things that could bother him or what other people hold very tightly as a defense. Or just ignores anything that's better off being ignored (death and maturity)seriously, who the fuck wants to talk about death?. He's passive and he's (as far as we can tell) an emotionally strong person that likes to keep things to himself. I think he's had a much more successful adulthood than Dan has, in that he has had the environment to find himself, find out who he is, and emotionally balance himself. Dan hasn't had this opportunity and doesn't know what to do with his life and who he is. But I digress.
I don't think how people talk and view Dan and Phil would change unless they switched places. Arguably, Phil would be more talked about if he were to tackle hard cases head on. I don't think he could put himself out there naked and vulnerable as Dan is able to do, but that's what makes him different. If Phil took on Dan's qualities of being assertive, open, and downright waffly about topics, then he might lose the characteristics that a lot of people like him for. Vice versa for Dan. I would like Phil to be more open, but I don't think I would like him to be more vulnerable, or expose himself. I'm glad that he knows that too, and that him and Dan assert that about him. I don't think anything will change how people on IDB, the phandom, how damn interviewers, and (as Dan puts it) "the filmmakers of YouTube" talk about them. Dan's the approachable "complexity", Phil isn't complex by what he gives, it's what he leaves up to speculation that people are not able to touch.
/word vomit over