Dan & Phil Part 6: Choke Me Dad(dy)

Our two favourite full time internet nerds who never go outside!
Locked
User avatar
Stakhanov
haru pillow
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:27 pm
Pronouns: he / him

SquishPhan wrote:
Stakhanov wrote:Did i just wander into the 'why I ship phan thread' ;-)

8:28 ... even when i put on extra heavy phan goggles i can't see the cuddling?
They are just sitting next to each other? They look a bit like half of my friend circle who are feeling out of place in a party xd
There's not even some kind of semi-embrace or something? This is the sort of evidence that makes me think they are platonic friends indeed
?? Why? That doesn't make sense to me. Like all couples have to be constantly cuddling or something.
No couple does that. It's just that i must wonder what else you read into their body language if you see some type of hug here.

Deppy is in pretty expansionist mindset. New merch while they are on tour? Smart move. If you can't see us live, there is always a consolation price to buy in our store Probably to cynical an interpretation, but I do think they are developing quite a keen sense of business.
Finding my own inarticulate prose
Weirding out strangers and laughing at those
Jaundiced and jaded, postured and posed
Not that we’re special it’s just that we’re
Closing in on a place where we might get to be
Living real people regularly
pearshaped34
morning quiff
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:42 am

gnostic wrote:If Dan and Phil are a couple, and then it would be reasonable to assume they are out to their closer friends - I wonder if they told Felix. That would have been an incredible conversation.

"So, remember all those times you joked about us giving each other rimjobs..."
I do wonder how many times D&P have had this conversation particularly if they are not a couple because unless they had partners they have managed to keep secret from the phandom they are two young guys who have not had a serious relationship in six years who live together. That alone would be enough to make the occasional auntie and colleague ask a few invasive questions without factoring in the leaked love confession and the massive following of online fans shipping them as a couple.

Re Outings. I do think at this stage without D&P admitting it themselves the person outing them would need a minimum of six of their sex tapes for it to even be considered good enough evidence to finally shut down the are they or aren't they debate once and for all.

Also regarding whether the likes of Evan and Emma know weren't they friends with Charlie? Presumably he knows the truth and I would be surprised if in private he was respectful of Dan and Phil's privacy so I'd imagine his told them whatever he might know.
Assuming they are really friend and not like youtube acquaintances who don't really know each other.

And add me to the people who don't see cuddling in that vlog. And I also didn't see kissing in the old party video where Dan's whispering in Phil's ear.
Last edited by pearshaped34 on Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
gnostic
stress mushroom
Posts: 617
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:40 pm

Stakhanov wrote:
Deppy is in pretty expansionist mindset. New merch while they are on tour? Smart move. If you can't see us live, there is always a consolation price to buy in our store Probably to cynical an interpretation, but I do think they are developing quite a keen sense of business.
It's not too cynical at all? Dan and Phil are a business enterprise, this is what they do. It would be noteworthy if they missed out on this perfect opportunity to make money, not otherwise.

People just need to abandon this idea that Youtubers, especially the bigger ones, are their internet buddies talking to them through a camera. It's about six years outdated at this point)
Just here for the marketing skills
trashqueen
ar·tic·u·late
Posts: 422
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:46 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: south america

spider wrote:Wonder if they really did whole new designs for the tour shirts. Also curious for the dolls.
trashqueen wrote:we seriously need to spread the sideface/resting doge face meme to the rest of the phandom, maybe if it gets big enough and it reaches dan he will finally notice how ridiculous he looks

re: 'who knows', i don't think that many people know as in have a confirmation from deppy, probs bryony, wirrow, pj, chris, louise and maybe felix and marzia, also maaaaybe tyler oakley, not that they are that close but i feel he would be the type to figure it out and have no problem asking them directly, and idk if they would lie about it, but i definitely believe emma and evan that they all gossip about it, how could they not, it's probably the biggest youtube mystery, if i was a youtuber i would start collecting bets
Don't know that it would be a good idea to point out an insecurity of someone who's had self image issues in the past. Not a fan of doge face but if that's how he feels comfortable I won't be one to tell him not to pose that way.

Would be very interested to know if Tyler knows. It seems like something he would have the tact not to ask as someone who's LGBT. Then again he did try to make Connor Franta's coming out about himself so maybe not that much tact.
is it pointing out an insecurity? we really don't know the reasoning behind that pose, even if it is i don't think it's that bad since we're all basically saying 'your face is very pretty u don't have to stand in very awkward ways to hide half of it trust us' not you know, the kind of making fun of someone's appearance that goes on in the trash threads of gigi

and about tyler, idk, i just feel like he's the type of person that likes getting involved in other people's businesses, and tbh i think the fact that he's gay might make him feel okay asking, since you know, 'he understands'.

being bi i have directly asked people i have a friendly but not close relationship with about their sexuality (completely different situation tho, no one i have ever asked is a famous closeted low level celebrity), just because i was curious and it was something we could 'bond' over, this is literally the first time in my life i have questioned if that's not an okay thing to do lol
Image
Dan Howell wrote:'[someone] just sent me a message saying 'Phil'..... same'
User avatar
DryCereal
koi pond
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:59 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: UK

SquishPhan wrote:
majitzu wrote: What Phil said: New Merch Tomorrow

What I hear: New Dan and Phil video tomorrow showing the new merch
That's what I heard as well.
I'm excited to see the new merch.
Let's hope so. Question is, where will they have filmed this vid?
hunnyftw wrote:Stakhanov, I agree that 8:28 seems... not so exciting. However, I would say that 8:58-59 is when you can somewhat argue that their hands and heads are really close to each other for a split second. That is, if you squint your eyes, put it on HD and replay it 5 times in a row, like I did :lol: But still, nothing that a pair of really good friends wouldn't do.
It's just your average socially-awkward party mode, with a hefty dose of "oh shit, we're surrounded by cameras we don't control"
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
hunnyftw
phabergé
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 7:40 am

gnostic wrote:It's not too cynical at all? Dan and Phil are a business enterprise, this is what they do. It would be noteworthy if they missed out on this perfect opportunity to make money, not otherwise.

People just need to abandon this idea that Youtubers, especially the bigger ones, are their internet buddies talking to them through a camera.
True dat. But also I feel that there's really nothing wrong with them wanting to make more money, y'know? As long as they try to be honest about it and maintain a healthy distance between themselves and the viewers. So basically no pretending that it's "all for you guyzzz, only because we love you so much guyzz". From what I've seen deppy didn't fall into that trap yet. Not even close.

It's also important that the product (be it a book, merch, a tour or a freakin' video maybe more than once a month pls) is good quality. by that I mean a quality acceptable for a particular viewer who has to judge for themselves, because it's obviously a freakishly subjective matter But other than that, get that money, boys!
akui
blobfish
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:50 am
Pronouns: She/Her
Location: Snowy Pear

fancybum & phamnotof, But the thing is with youtubers, or with people in general, if a person is gossiping to you about other people's business, you know they ain't trustworthy. And Dan himself knows that, do does Phil, I guess Felix knows that as well. So if PJ is telling Felix the thing that Deppy wouldn't want others to know, would Felix trust PJ and be friend with him? I think not.[/quote]

I think there's quite a difference between 'gossiping' and 'casually discussing mutual friends in a private environment' though. If PJ/Soph are just hanging out with Melix and somebody mentions D&P, I don't see any need for PJ to put a guard up and change the subject or lie. They're all friends with each other. If I were writing fanfic this scenario seems plausible: early days of PJ/Felix friendship - PJ mentions D&P in passing - Felix makes a joke about delusional shippers - PJ goes 'uhh actually' - Felix goes 'oh whoops' - and everybody goes on with their lives because it's not really that big of a deal offline. Then they all hang out together, and everybody just knows they're all coupled off and act normally because it's normal and these people aren't in high school.
akui wrote: Dan and Phil put so much effort into avoiding vlog cams for so many years, if they really out to all the youtubers, they will be naturally assume that people will out them for the views, because they all already know, and they didn't out them already. Plus there are gonna be anonymous youtubers posting in GG saying that phan is common knowledge in youtubers blah blah. The fact deppy are so discreet means that not many people knows.
That just seems like paranoid thinking. It's not impossible, but what kind of garbage person would you have to be to do that and also alienate yourself from the entire community in the process. It wouldn't be worth it. Other people are keeping things about their lives private - if somebody intentionally outs somebody else (or tries to) for 'the views', they can just nail their own coffin shut. They'll be cast out of the community because they'll have just demonstrated that nobody can trust them. (Like I could see an Onision type of person trying that, but they wouldn't even be involved in the community to begin with, and therefore wouldn't have any workable info with which to out anybody in the first place).

People I assume to be aware of their private lives have nothing to gain from doing that. Does pewdiepie need the views or attention from outing anybody? Or Anthony Padilla? They have literally nothing to gain and therefore no outright reason to be considered untrustworthy. They do shut down more around smaller vloggers (Evan...) because obviously he's not somebody they trust and has outright demonstrated that he can't be trusted. Because of that, I don't think they're willingly 'out' to all the youtubers, no. But there's enough gossiping and secondhand information that everybody most likely assumes it to be true whether they've had firsthand confirmation from D&P themselves or not. I think it's a thing that everybody 'knows', but also knows not to talk about it.
akui wrote:I'm pretty sure Jack doesn't know, and if doesn't, Hazel is more less likely to know. If Jack knows, he won't be almost out them twice, he would be saying "youtube changed, it used to be about creativity, not hot guys dating rumor" and shit like that. First time he did that in Dan's liveshow he was joking with Phil and following Louise's teasing at Phil saying "Phil was texting his girlfriend", and Jack followed by asking "boyfriend?" If he knows, why would he ask that cuz Phil's boyfriend was sitting right next to him. And the second time in Louise's vlog, Jack say "you are making out with..." and Dan cutted him saying "Not me and you (making out)", my guess is Jack was trying to make a phan joke but Dan didn't like it. Again, if he knows for sure he wouldn't make such a joke he would avoid phan topic or help hide phan.
Again this is all just my opinion, but those types of uncomfortable jokes always feel like the person making them is trying too hard to seem casual about phan. They're essentially trying to double-bluff, like "if I joke about this even though I know it's true, the viewers will think it's not true, because otherwise why would I joke about it so casually". Which seems like too many mental gymnastics, but oh well. It's the impression I get.

Something I found interesting in that group liveshow is Dan asked Jack and Tom if they were gamers (and then what games Tom played), so they obviously weren't that close at the time (late 2013?), so it's possible Jack didn't know for sure then. But then again they had already known each other for years before that so now I'm kind of talking myself out of it being impossible.. No, I still think they all know.
PolarFox wrote: Now I'm just wondering what would happen if they got outed the way zalfie did. (a cheeky kiss on camera left in a vlog) I mean, what would the Phandom do? It could be a massive shitstorm of happy and angry fans - happy that they now "know" and angry because how could they do that to them. Or would they just keep it silent and make some excuse? And what would Deppy do? I mean... This interests me.
Not that I would want something like that to happen to them if they really are together
I think they're beyond the stage of panicked denials and fabrications these days. If anything ever did happen that looked pretty irrefutable and unexplainable, I think they would straight up say: please respect my privacy (because of course they'd address it separately), I don't want to talk about it, it has nothing to do with my channel, etc. And that would pretty much end the discussion. On their end anyway, obviously the rest of the internet would freak out forever, but fans would respect their boundaries as much as we do now..[/quote][/spoiler]

I think PJ's statement of "i treat them as humans" are pretty saying about his attitude towards leaking other people's privacy, even just insinuating. But if such thing really happened, more like between Louise and Jack, it would be so awkward, and totally a situation of "they know he know they know he know bit nobody say anything" situation.
Moderator Action :
edited post to correct code to sort out forum alignment issue - emma
Lurktacularr
procrastinator
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:01 pm
Pronouns: she/her

+1 for not seeing cuddling in that party vlog. Looks like standard sitting-so-close-I-can-taste-the-food-you-just-ate Deppy to me.

On the 'who knows' debate - for me I can't see there being many major UK youtubers who don't know, simply through association. I'm convinced the likes of Louise knows and if you just follow that one person:

Louise knows --> therefore Zalfie knows --> therefore Joe knows --> therefore Caspar knows --> therefore Louis knows

Or even take a different path...

Louise knows --> therefore Hazel knows --> therefore Jack knows --> therefore Dean knows --> therefore Tom knows and so on

Coincidentally (or maybe not ) right there above you've got most of the UK youtubers they've collabed with.

I don't think it will be 'gossiping', just 'not withholding info from someone you're very close with'. And those links above are close, not tenuous. The sort of close where it'd be weird/difficult to keep it to yourself. I suspect Deppy know and are ok with this and trust that people they trust won't tell someone they know to be a blabbermouth moron. First-hand confirmations will be much rarer I'm guessing.


So basically... 6 degrees of separation Phan

Very interesting to consider Tyler. My gut says yes but its not as much as a sure thing in my mind as the likes of Louise.
I wonder how biology can explain the physical pain you feel in your chest when all you want to do is talk shit on IDB
User avatar
missemma
#teamshavedsides
#teamshavedsides
Posts: 1869
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 4:08 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: london

spider wrote:Have to agree with Stakhanov here. They always sit practically on top of each other. They wouldn't do something like cuddle in such a public and heavily recorded place.
Same! Plus you can also see Dan waving around something silvery with his left hand during her vlog, theres no cuddling going on.
:prideheart: :gayaf: :prideheart:
grannypants
living flop
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:13 pm
Pronouns: she/her

akui wrote: #phan

m'kay
okay why does dan look so tall here? i swear he's supposed to be only an inch taller than phil :? my brain is so confused
"don't mind me, just having a little float" - dan howell
Image
coffee pig
woodland creature
Posts: 574
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:37 pm
Pronouns: ''ugh, her again''
Location: London

jhamba wrote:
gnostic wrote:Ah, i found that Louise post when she strongly implies phan isn't real, now to find out how to upload from mobile, and hope no one will ban my antiphan ass

EDIT:
lol, believe me, most of us don't find anti phan proof threatening. Only bi erasure, or the implication that everyone is straight, until they say otherwise, and, sometimes, not even then I'm not bitter :oops:
Agreeing with jhamba here, I welcome anti-phan proof most of the time because most of us on here are too far gone with the Phan train to get off, myself included, so it's refreshing to see things from a different perspective. I've been through the 'anti-Phan' tumblr blog, and I think so much of the 'proof' can be argued either way that my opinion still isn't set in stone. I think I just like looking at both sides of the argument too much to have a set opinion. As for the Dan and Phil thing in Lily's blog, it's so blurry that I don't want to pass judgment on it. Funny how people will want to read too much into that and yet no one ever seems to breathe a word about the 2009 Halloween gathering video, which is a lot more interesting.
As I have no idea how to embed gifs...sorry everyone, I'll just set up a link to a Tumblr post of the screenshots. Someone please tell me how to embed gifs please

http://lineofsymmetry.tumblr.com/post/1 ... e-last-gif
{ bisexual Philophile and respectful stalker since 2008 }
User avatar
DryCereal
koi pond
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:59 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: UK

grannypants wrote:
akui wrote: #phan

m'kay
okay why does dan look so tall here? i swear he's supposed to be only an inch taller than phil :? my brain is so confused
Somebody is fibbing about their height. Not sure who. :wtf:
bedhead91 wrote:Someone please tell me how to embed gifs please

Image
Use the [img] tags
also: who borked the forum display? SWEAR it wasn't me this time, I was busy watching insanely cute videos of my friends baby watching Cats for the first time, completely entranced!!
Last edited by DryCereal on Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
User avatar
felucca
truth bomb
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:53 pm

(lol another one of my long posts just answering people, this is what happens when you only have time to check IDB in the evening)
Diyes_Celine wrote:If D&P are together, does this mean there are more Youtubers who know the real score than we suspected?
spider wrote:It wouldn't be that surprising if it turned out a lot more people know than we think. Maybe it's even public knowledge within YT circles.
I, too, suspect most youtubers know. The idea that they don't always seemed weird to me tbh. People gossip. Whether they're together or not I'm sure word's made its way around the British Youtube community a few times - most people wouldn't get the information first hand from Dan and Phil, that's true, but people will talk. Remember people like Emma and Evan communicated with Charlieskies back in the day and Evan's tweeted about watching the vday video and how everyone talks behind closed doors. D&P might be private, but they're not islands. Too many people from the old youtube community would know the truth.

(It all reminds me a bit of gay youtuber Jimmy0010, who only came out on youtube last year. In a video he and his friend Chels made a while back Chels talks about meeting Jimmy for the first time - and already knowing he was gay even though he wasn't public with it, because people in the community talked.)
jhamba wrote:
kooshka wrote:If someone ever were to out them, it would have to be done with "got nothing to lose"-kind of attitude. Can you imagine the shitstorm? It would have a huge impact on your career, and probably not a good one, no one wants to be around a blabbermouth and even if the phandom was happy about it they'd probably get really mad protecting their smol sweet cinnamon angel rolls of sunshine and rainbows. And while YouTubers might seem like a tightly knit group of besties, they might not actually be that good friends even if it seems that way on camera/social media. If they are together I really doubt that most of them have a clue about what's going on and they're just as lost as we are.
charlieskies. and, I don't think people will listen to any desperate youtuber, considering the way people reacted to charlie basically outing Dan.
Matt Lush. He's literally said he knows phan is real and they make a cute couple, but who the fuck listens to Matt Lush.
oqua wrote:120. 3sixty5days
121. charlieandstephen
Charlie and Stephen had a joint Dailybooth account? :lol: And Dan followed it before he followed Stephen? :lol:
They really were one of the original youtube power couples weren't they.
phamnotof wrote:meanwhile, my phan af ass is here just like excitedly awaiting that post because I've been collecting phan reactions/opinions of the people I consider to be D&P's *close* circle of actual beloved friends & the patterns so far seem to suggest that they all have this Protect Dan And Phil Don't The Bait Shippers thing in common & I find that rather telling.
Aww you're compiling those too? :D Looking forward to that post. I've got a very neglected folder on my computer with some examples and it could use some love. (I agree it's interesting that so many random people around D&P got VERY defensive in denying their relationship in 2012-2013. There was no sense of laughing it off at all.)
fancybum wrote:Well I guess we can all go home guys, Louise has spoken and she only ships Phan in the way she ships herself with her straight friend. It's been fun.
And Catrific's spoken - Dan is straight.
Phew, glad we finally got that sorted!

Btw I had to laugh when I read about the Louise "honestly no one knows" answer about phan because I was literally just writing it into the FAQ yesterday, haha. (The FAQ that will be published, eventually. It's still in its infant stage.) There were a lot of people from that crowd that confirmed she said it, but no video unfortunately so we'll never know if they all just collectively lied. Louise did like a tumblr post right after though, from a fan pleading other fans not to ask Louise about phan, which is suspiciously well-timed if she didn't say anything.

Note: This was Playlist 2015, and it wasn't Louise's only infraction around this time - she supposedly also almost outed Tronnor, talked about D&P's "girl box" in their bathroom (which made D&P very confused in a liveshow later on hahaha) and while her marriage with Matt was crumbling around her she liked a Louise/Dan fan fic where the story was Dan comforting her after her marriage had fallen apart. Oh and she had that awkward liveshow phonecall with Dan and Phil, too. <--- I'm thinking Louise might have had a bit of a bad time around this time, is all I'm saying.
bedhead91 wrote:Image
Lol I remember seeing this when I was still a wee little anti-phan and feeling like "so what?? friends can usher their friends to move on the subway without secretly fucking you know..." and now I see the same thing and just go "aw, young love".
beforetherumblecomes wrote:As someone who is more wirrow than Deppy trash, I can tell you that Wirrony were dating before D & P even knew each other.
Since when?
dat veniam corvis, vexat censura columbas

:dh:
akui
blobfish
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:50 am
Pronouns: She/Her
Location: Snowy Pear

Re Lurktacularr

Idk, i feel like Louise, if she knows, when asked, she would joke it off or something. It's really not that difficult to lie you know, especially they are public figures, half of their job is to "pretend". Same with Tyler.
Lurktacularr
procrastinator
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:01 pm
Pronouns: she/her

IckleMissMayhem wrote:
also: who borked the forum display? SWEAR it wasn't me this time, I was busy watching insanely cute videos of my friends baby watching Cats for the first time, completely entranced!!
Shotgun not me even though I'm the one it starts going wide on... wot u tryna say IDB

akui but that's like if a fan, acquaintance etc asks you. Then yeah sure you brush it off. But what about your besties? Is it likely they'd even /ask/, or more likely it would just come up in conversation directly or indirectly (i.e. them being together not being the topic, but being clear or implicit in the topic).

I reckon the latter.
I wonder how biology can explain the physical pain you feel in your chest when all you want to do is talk shit on IDB
User avatar
missemma
#teamshavedsides
#teamshavedsides
Posts: 1869
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 4:08 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: london

Moderator Action :
I've fixed the broken coding, and I just want to ask kindly again, can people refrain from using the size 50 (tiny) font because it is so difficult to read. If we could just stick to using nothing less than "small" in the font drop down that would be amazing! Sorry to be a pain, but we've had a few people saying they are finding it very difficult to read :)
:prideheart: :gayaf: :prideheart:
User avatar
Rigby
lady door
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:39 pm

grannypants wrote:
akui wrote: #phan

m'kay
okay why does dan look so tall here? i swear he's supposed to be only an inch taller than phil :? my brain is so confused
To me it looks like Phil's standing a bit further away from the camera and Dan's standing a bit closer to the camera. I think it's a matter of perspective.
User avatar
DryCereal
koi pond
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:59 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: UK

Rigby wrote:
grannypants wrote:
akui wrote: #phan

m'kay
okay why does dan look so tall here? i swear he's supposed to be only an inch taller than phil :? my brain is so confused
To me it looks like Phil's standing a bit further away from the camera and Dan's standing a bit closer to the camera. I think it's a matter of perspective.
FIBBING. Dan isn't even standing up straight in that pic. If Dan is 6'3", Phil is probably 6'1" tops.
Image
Image
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
User avatar
missemma
#teamshavedsides
#teamshavedsides
Posts: 1869
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 4:08 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: london

We are almost at page 32 guys, we need some thread name suggestions

:prideheart: :gayaf: :prideheart:
User avatar
Stakhanov
haru pillow
Posts: 789
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:27 pm
Pronouns: he / him

hunnyftw wrote:
gnostic wrote:It's not too cynical at all? Dan and Phil are a business enterprise, this is what they do. It would be noteworthy if they missed out on this perfect opportunity to make money, not otherwise.

People just need to abandon this idea that Youtubers, especially the bigger ones, are their internet buddies talking to them through a camera.
True dat. But also I feel that there's really nothing wrong with them wanting to make more money, y'know? As long as they try to be honest about it and maintain a healthy distance between themselves and the viewers. So basically no pretending that it's "all for you guyzzz, only because we love you so much guyzz". From what I've seen deppy didn't fall into that trap yet. Not even close.

It's also important that the product (be it a book, merch, a tour or a freakin' video maybe more than once a month pls) is good quality. by that I mean a quality acceptable for a particular viewer who has to judge for themselves, because it's obviously a freakishly subjective matter But other than that, get that money, boys!
Amen to that. Still, while I think they are trying to make a buck in a fairly honest and straightforward way, they will always have to balance between the strong personal connection that so many fans feel with them (if only because of the vlog format) and capitalizing on that connection.
I certainly prefer them doing tours and making books above some soccer player getting millions for wearing some nike shoes though.

There are so many other interesting posts i was going to comment on, but the 2009 halloween gifs sidetracked me. They're being all kinds of cute again. Wake me up when September ends the garbage collectors are here.
Finding my own inarticulate prose
Weirding out strangers and laughing at those
Jaundiced and jaded, postured and posed
Not that we’re special it’s just that we’re
Closing in on a place where we might get to be
Living real people regularly
User avatar
SquishPhan
capita£ester
Posts: 2502
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: The Netherlands

IckleMissMayhem wrote: FIBBING. Dan isn't even standing up straight in that pic. If Dan is 6'3", Phil is probably 6'1" tops.
Image
Image
I've though for a while now that they are not as close in height like they pretend to be. Although I have never understood why they would lie about something like that, these boys can be a bit strange that way.
User avatar
kusunoki masashige
butt chair
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:57 pm

IckleMissMayhem wrote: FIBBING. Dan isn't even standing up straight in that pic. If Dan is 6'3", Phil is probably 6'1" tops.
This confuses me to no end! In photos, Dan always looks way taller, but in their DDR vid they look the same height! Did something go wrong with some of the google-clones or what

Lurktacularr
procrastinator
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:01 pm
Pronouns: she/her

SquishPhan wrote:
IckleMissMayhem wrote: FIBBING. Dan isn't even standing up straight in that pic. If Dan is 6'3", Phil is probably 6'1" tops.
Image
Image
I've though for a while now that they are not as close in height like they pretend to be. Although I have never understood why they would lie about something like that, these boys can be a bit strange that way.
Same. I think being the same (very tall) height is part of their 'we look like each other' gimmick with the hair etc.

I think listing Phil at 6"2.9' was a tell-tale he's tangibly shorter cos otherwise they'd have stuck him at 6'3 for the sake of 0.1inches. Radio shows (rip) are a dead giveaway.
I wonder how biology can explain the physical pain you feel in your chest when all you want to do is talk shit on IDB
User avatar
DryCereal
koi pond
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:59 am
Pronouns: she/her
Location: UK

RIGHT. Who has PL M&G or TATINOF VIP and is willing to get out the tape measure?!
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
User avatar
oqua
nose pervert
nose pervert
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:05 pm
Pronouns: she/her
Location: California, USA

Lurktacularr wrote:
SquishPhan wrote:
IckleMissMayhem wrote: FIBBING. Dan isn't even standing up straight in that pic. If Dan is 6'3", Phil is probably 6'1" tops.
Image
Image
I've though for a while now that they are not as close in height like they pretend to be. Although I have never understood why they would lie about something like that, these boys can be a bit strange that way.
Same. I think being the same (very tall) height is part of their 'we look like each other' gimmick with the hair etc.

I think listing Phil at 6"2.9' was a tell-tale he's tangibly shorter cos otherwise they'd have stuck him at 6'3 for the sake of 0.1inches. Radio shows (rip) are a dead giveaway.
I am fascinated by the idea that Dan denies his own physical growth. I'm also fascinated by the idea that Dan wants to look like Phil. The first one has more evidence than the second as far as I can recall but both ideas are very intriguing to me.

[offtopic]If anyone is super concerned by Dan's Dailybooth follows, I just want to note that indieminx is on there twice. That's a mistake; the first one should be replaced by "nimbus." That is all.[/offtopic]
busy being happy~
Locked

Return to “Daniel Howell & Phil Lester”