i mean they didn't show them, but i thought they were supposed to be other people on the busgnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.
OK nope the #busgate has risen...................
Dan & Phil part 27: Let's Go Home
-
papierklemmen
- flower crown
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am
OK nope the #busgate has risen...................
-
Galactic-Howell
- pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:43 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Great White North
You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
Wholesome doggo shitposting through life.
You may also call me Gal!
You may also call me Gal!
-
SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
Well if there were other people on the bus as well, I can see how it would be awkward.gnostic wrote:Not about that specifically, just when you're roommating with someone for five years you gonna get many instances of accidentaly nudity or sorting each other's laundry or what not000dia000 wrote:they have a frosted door on their bathroom, don't they?gnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.
I'm laughing bc didn't Dan literally just tweet they broke the bus shower door 100 times, directly contradicting them not showering there often? Boys you have to start coordinating your answerseevee wrote: we may be free of #busgate tweets but courtesy of Phil, we now have #showergate
#showergate
Didn't someone on here Nancydrew out it was just Deppy, Drake and their driver on that bus? If not, then I take my words back but I still don't believe that shit lol.SquishPhan wrote:Well if there were other people on the bus as well, I can see how it would be awkward.gnostic wrote:Not about that specifically, just when you're roommating with someone for five years you gonna get many instances of accidentaly nudity or sorting each other's laundry or what not000dia000 wrote:they have a frosted door on their bathroom, don't they?gnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.
Just here for the marketing skills
-
violet-writer
- living flop
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:16 pm
Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
when you first saw her-beauty, the dream- the human vortex of your life- or him - did you stop, and stand in the crisp air, breathing like a tree? did you change your life?
~ mary oliver
~ mary oliver
-
nephilimcat
- woodland creature
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:52 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Germany
When you guys said they harued it, I didn't believe it. When I finally started to process it, Dan posts that shit. UGH! Why do you they this to us? I love them, but sometimes all I wanna do is punch them in the face. Ok, punch Dan in the face, I don't think I could do this to Phil. Sorry Dan
So glad I didn't watch the documentary again. I will one day, when #busgate died. If it ever dies...
Edit:
So glad I didn't watch the documentary again. I will one day, when #busgate died. If it ever dies...
Edit:
That's not even it. It's just not very "philly" to let Dan sleep in a bunk that is obviously to small for him. And someone brought up the management: Would they let Dan sleep there with the risk of him getting back problems and not being able to do the show. I would believe that they alternated and that they shared the bed platonically, but this is just ridiculous.violet-writer wrote:Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
Last edited by nephilimcat on Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pulvis et umbra sumus
-
papierklemmen
- flower crown
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am
yeah cause that wasn't scripted at all
-
papierklemmen
- flower crown
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am
hey, i'm one of the people who 99,9% doesn't think they're dating. what we're complaining about here is the bullshit they're trying to pull while maintaining the ambiguity. i don't think they are together, but i sure as hell think they shared that bed and them scripting the hell out of it was stupid.violet-writer wrote:Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringeviolet-writer wrote:Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
Just here for the marketing skills
-
SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
Cute.000dia000 wrote: Awww
Agreed.000dia000 wrote:I thought that their approach was fine? They didn't shove it in our faces, Dan made a light comment...this is old news.
-
papierklemmen
- flower crown
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 am
[offtopic]
not the op, but i guess the lee pace/richard armitage thing? lol[/offtopic]mio wrote:Lee Pace? What did I miss again?gnostic wrote: I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook)
-
SquishPhan
- capita£ester
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:18 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: The Netherlands
So proud of them.
-
violet-writer
- living flop
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:16 pm
i totally get that. what i mean is that they wanted to show us that they didnt share a bed. whether they did or didn't.. that doesn't really matter. busgate was (imo) them stationing in the nonambiguous 'We're not together' camp.gnostic wrote:I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringeviolet-writer wrote:Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
when you first saw her-beauty, the dream- the human vortex of your life- or him - did you stop, and stand in the crisp air, breathing like a tree? did you change your life?
~ mary oliver
~ mary oliver
-
violet-writer
- living flop
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 6:16 pm
i will never get over the fact that we could have seen live sappy deppy in their pajamas. i mean the tweets were funny and sweet but still.
when you first saw her-beauty, the dream- the human vortex of your life- or him - did you stop, and stand in the crisp air, breathing like a tree? did you change your life?
~ mary oliver
~ mary oliver
I agree about them nudging everyone towards no-phano with this, but disagree about lack of ambiguity, but this train of thought will just lead to my usual queerbaiting rant, and no one here wants to read that againviolet-writer wrote:i totally get that. what i mean is that they wanted to show us that they didnt share a bed. whether they did or didn't.. that doesn't really matter. busgate was (imo) them stationing in the nonambiguous 'We're not together' camp.gnostic wrote:I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringeviolet-writer wrote:Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh
.. why not, though?
with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.
(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)
Just here for the marketing skills
-
nephilimcat
- woodland creature
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 12:52 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Germany
Same. At least a Phil-only ls, is that really too much to ask for?violet-writer wrote:i will never get over the fact that we could have seen live sappy deppy in their pajamas. i mean the tweets were funny and sweet but still.
Why did they have to replace the freaking ls. Argh. The only thing that can make me appreciate this would be a joint ls on Tuesday. But I don't even remotely believe it will happen. Please shock me in a good way, guys!pulvis et umbra sumus
-
RiriPandaHeart2
- phabergé
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 12:54 pm
Kinda OT, but I'm actually curious if it trended? Because when I sporadically checked the trending tags it didn't trend for me whether locally or worldwide. Is the Phandom's power becoming weaker or are we fewer now? 
P: What are you doing?
D: I'm feeding it to you.
P: Why is it so slow?
Yeah, I kept checking but tags that were trending only had 3-5000 tweets so I think twitter had something to do with it thinking it was spam? Idk but there has been A LOT of tweets, that's for certainRiriPandaHeart2 wrote:Kinda OT, but I'm actually curious if it trended? Because when I sporadically checked the trending tags it didn't trend for me whether locally or worldwide. Is the Phandom's power becoming weaker or are we fewer now?
