IDB

gnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.

i mean they didn't show them, but i thought they were supposed to be other people on the bus

OK nope the #busgate has risen...................

You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

gnostic wrote:

000dia000 wrote:

gnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.

they have a frosted door on their bathroom, don't they?

Not about that specifically, just when you're roommating with someone for five years you gonna get many instances of accidentaly nudity or sorting each other's laundry or what not

Well if there were other people on the bus as well, I can see how it would be awkward.

eevee wrote:

we may be free of #busgate tweets but courtesy of Phil, we now have #showergate

I'm laughing bc didn't Dan literally just tweet they broke the bus shower door 100 times, directly contradicting them not showering there often? Boys you have to start coordinating your answers #showergate

This was a quasi-haru to numb the pain lol

SquishPhan wrote:

gnostic wrote:

000dia000 wrote:

gnostic wrote:Showering in a bus with your roommate of 5 years is awkward. Suuuure Jan.

they have a frosted door on their bathroom, don't they?

Not about that specifically, just when you're roommating with someone for five years you gonna get many instances of accidentaly nudity or sorting each other's laundry or what not

Well if there were other people on the bus as well, I can see how it would be awkward.

Didn't someone on here Nancydrew out it was just Deppy, Drake and their driver on that bus? If not, then I take my words back but I still don't believe that shit lol.

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

When you guys said they harued it, I didn't believe it. When I finally started to process it, Dan posts that shit. UGH! Why do you they this to us? I love them, but sometimes all I wanna do is punch them in the face. Ok, punch Dan in the face, I don't think I could do this to Phil. Sorry Dan
So glad I didn't watch the documentary again. I will one day, when #busgate died. If it ever dies...

Edit:

violet-writer wrote:

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

That's not even it. It's just not very "philly" to let Dan sleep in a bunk that is obviously to small for him. And someone brought up the management: Would they let Dan sleep there with the risk of him getting back problems and not being able to do the show. I would believe that they alternated and that they shared the bed platonically, but this is just ridiculous.

yeah cause that wasn't scripted at all

Awww

violet-writer wrote:

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

hey, i'm one of the people who 99,9% doesn't think they're dating. what we're complaining about here is the bullshit they're trying to pull while maintaining the ambiguity. i don't think they are together, but i sure as hell think they shared that bed and them scripting the hell out of it was stupid.

violet-writer wrote:

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringe

I thought that their approach was fine? They didn't shove it in our faces, Dan made a light comment...this is old news.

000dia000 wrote:

Awww

Cute.

000dia000 wrote:I thought that their approach was fine? They didn't shove it in our faces, Dan made a light comment...this is old news.

Agreed.

gnostic wrote: I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook)

Lee Pace? What did I miss again?

[offtopic]

mio wrote:

gnostic wrote: I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook)

Lee Pace? What did I miss again?

not the op, but i guess the lee pace/richard armitage thing? lol[/offtopic]

So proud of them.

gnostic wrote:

violet-writer wrote:

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringe

i totally get that. what i mean is that they wanted to show us that they didnt share a bed. whether they did or didn't.. that doesn't really matter. busgate was (imo) them stationing in the nonambiguous 'We're not together' camp.

I'll be honest, that was very underwhelming.

i will never get over the fact that we could have seen live sappy deppy in their pajamas. i mean the tweets were funny and sweet but still.

violet-writer wrote:

gnostic wrote:

violet-writer wrote:

Galactic-Howell wrote:You've GOT to be kidding me. No one believes you, Dan. Smh

.. why not, though?

with deppy and their relationship status, i tend to favour the 'whatever is most plausible' at the moment. and right now, they are explicitly telling/showing us that they don't share a bed and don't see eachother naked (shower tweet). yes, they could be lying to us for years and hiding a relationship.
but i don't think they are. sometimes the simplest explanation is the truth.

(sorry if this came off rude i didn't intend for it to be!!)

I am 94% on the side of "just bffls" (used to be 98% but lee pace got me shook) but I can't imagine a situation in which a bff lets me sleep on a tiny bunk and get a horrible pain in my back while he hogs a giant bed. Like at least alternate. So i do believe them when they are trying to nohomo, but the specific details they put forward make me cringe

i totally get that. what i mean is that they wanted to show us that they didnt share a bed. whether they did or didn't.. that doesn't really matter. busgate was (imo) them stationing in the nonambiguous 'We're not together' camp.

I agree about them nudging everyone towards no-phano with this, but disagree about lack of ambiguity, but this train of thought will just lead to my usual queerbaiting rant, and no one here wants to read that again

violet-writer wrote:i will never get over the fact that we could have seen live sappy deppy in their pajamas. i mean the tweets were funny and sweet but still.

Same. At least a Phil-only ls, is that really too much to ask for? Why did they have to replace the freaking ls. Argh. The only thing that can make me appreciate this would be a joint ls on Tuesday. But I don't even remotely believe it will happen. Please shock me in a good way, guys!

I know tension is high right now but I've come up with the perfect last post on this website if I'm ever going to be fucked over:

Kinda OT, but I'm actually curious if it trended? Because when I sporadically checked the trending tags it didn't trend for me whether locally or worldwide. Is the Phandom's power becoming weaker or are we fewer now?

RiriPandaHeart2 wrote:Kinda OT, but I'm actually curious if it trended? Because when I sporadically checked the trending tags it didn't trend for me whether locally or worldwide. Is the Phandom's power becoming weaker or are we fewer now?

Yeah, I kept checking but tags that were trending only had 3-5000 tweets so I think twitter had something to do with it thinking it was spam? Idk but there has been A LOT of tweets, that's for certain