i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
I am so in love with the fact that they're one vlogger. That is just so beyond silly. But interesting, thought they just took a break with R1, this definitely suggests they're not under contract with them anymore.danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
This is interesting. I've just been looking up the terms and conditions for the nominations and this is what it is for the vlog category this year:danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
I'm guessing D&PGames would count as the 'single channel', and it just about works as 'day-to-day life experience'. And there's nothing here about not being employed by the BBC.This category is for the most exciting Vlogger(s) (aka Video Blogger) male, female or collective.
A vlogger is an individual or collective who publish regular videos featuring themselves and based on their day-to-day life experience. Vlogging can include diaries, tutorials, stunts and sketches relating to subjects and pastimes, of personal interest to the individual/collective hosting the channel.
Video makers creating drama content, fiction or presenting majority commercially-sponsored videos are not eligible.
The nominated Vlogger(s) must have posted at least 11 video blogs to a single channel on the internet between1st September 2015 and 14th August 2016.
So Phil wouldn't have qualified last year for two reasons, and Dan for one.This category is for the most exciting young (under 25 on 1st September 2015) British Vlogger(s) (aka Video Blogger) male, female or collective. A vlogger is an individual or collective who publish regular videos featuring themselves and based on their day-to-day
life experience. Vlogging can include diaries, tutorials, stunts and sketches relating to subjects and pastimes, of personal interest to the individual/collective hosting the channel. Video makers creating drama content, fiction or presenting majority commercially-sponsored videos are not eligible. The nominated male/female/collective must be a British Citizen, or in the case of a collective, the majority of the group must be British Citizens and have posted at least 11 video blogs to a single channel on the internet. They cannot have a regular show on the BBC.
Very cute that they are one.phamnotof wrote:I am so in love with the fact that they're one vlogger. That is just so beyond silly. But interesting, thought they just took a break with R1, this definitely suggests they're not under contract with them anymore.danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
I don't think they are gonna win as zoella and joe are gonna push their subs to vote and we know deppy . It's interesting and if the rules have changed maybe we can still hope for the return of deppy . . I think that it would be interesting to see if deppy talks about it,also just realized that I assumed that here what counts it's the votes from people.mez29 wrote:This is interesting. I've just been looking up the terms and conditions for the nominations and this is what it is for the vlog category this year:danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
So Phil wouldn't have qualified last year for two reasons, and Dan for one.
I'm not going to try drawing any conclusions from this, but … interesting.
I really want them to win though because they've never been nominated before because of the T&C. It is interesting how they omitted the age limit and the regular BBC thing, it makes me think they deliberately did it so they can nominate Deppy. Lol.corn flakes wrote:I don't think they are gonna win as zoella and joe are gonna push their subs to vote and we know deppy . It's interesting and if the rules have changed maybe we can still hope for the return of deppy . . I think that it would be interesting to see if deppy talks about it,also just realized that I assumed that here what counts it's the votes from people.mez29 wrote:This is interesting. I've just been looking up the terms and conditions for the nominations and this is what it is for the vlog category this year:danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
So Phil wouldn't have qualified last year for two reasons, and Dan for one.
I'm not going to try drawing any conclusions from this, but … interesting.

LOL, of course they have to change the rulesmez29 wrote: Last year's is quite different:
So Phil wouldn't have qualified last year for two reasons, and Dan for one.This category is for the most exciting young (under 25 on 1st September 2015) British Vlogger(s) (aka Video Blogger) male, female or collective. A vlogger is an individual or collective who publish regular videos featuring themselves and based on their day-to-day
life experience. Vlogging can include diaries, tutorials, stunts and sketches relating to subjects and pastimes, of personal interest to the individual/collective hosting the channel. Video makers creating drama content, fiction or presenting majority commercially-sponsored videos are not eligible. The nominated male/female/collective must be a British Citizen, or in the case of a collective, the majority of the group must be British Citizens and have posted at least 11 video blogs to a single channel on the internet. They cannot have a regular show on the BBC
I'm not going to try drawing any conclusions from this, but … interesting.
My thoughts exactly.swofro wrote:It is interesting how they omitted the age limit and the regular BBC thing, it makes me think they deliberately did it so they can nominate Deppy. Lol.
thats why both of them are nominated. will give the award to each otherIckleMissMayhem wrote:Can we get it so they present it again and also win it? Because that amount of silliness would entertain me greatly.
Off the vote is not available outside the UK. I didn't want to vote anyway. I have better things to do, like trying to sleep 1 hour more.IckleMissMayhem wrote:Voting closes 19:00BST on Sunday

Aaaaaaand yet again the BBC showing they fail to grasp how the internet works. Fuckssake Auntie, sort your shit out.majitzu wrote:Off the vote is not available outside the UK. I didn't want to vote anyway. I have better things to do, like trying to sleep 1 hour more.IckleMissMayhem wrote:Voting closes 19:00BST on Sunday
Very annoying that we outside the UK can't vote.majitzu wrote:Off the vote is not available outside the UK. I didn't want to vote anyway. I have better things to do, like trying to sleep 1 hour more.IckleMissMayhem wrote:Voting closes 19:00BST on Sunday
You're not alone. This reasoning definitely crossed my mind as well and for now I'm holding on to it because the 2-hour long radio shows are still my favourite thing Deppy's ever done so I want to believe.fancybum wrote:Agree with mez29 about it making sense to adjust the guidelines to include more 'popular' nominees (pewds, deppy) BUT I'm also going to be optimistic and think they at least partly wanted to nominate D&P (whether they win or not) to get them back in people's minds (like general teen BBC audience) to start hyping their glorious return to the airwaves
just let me have this
I literally just watched that liveshow before bed last night! It was one before Christmas last year where they're in their festive jumpers; it wasn't a promo though. Just a video that plays in the entrance of the radio building. Haha I still love Phil talking about how he tripped over wires in front of all the DJs while filming it and says "they all know how awkward we are anyway." How could the BBC possibly let them go? I will not accept.rizzo wrote: That said, this reminded me.... Remember when they talked about doing BBCR1 promo in a LS? I think a DJ even snapped it at one point, where they had go in to film a whole duo thing where they're walking toward the camera and like "fighting" over who gets to stand in front. Whatever it was, has anyone seen this promo? Has it been used?
It was for a 3D display screen inside R1. Sooo.. presumably it got used?rizzo wrote:I genuinely hope this says nothing about their possible return. The radio is my favorite thing they do and easily one of their best connections. Can you tell I live vicariously through their success?
That said, this reminded me.... Remember when they talked about doing BBCR1 promo in a LS? I think a DJ even snapped it at one point, where they had go in to film a whole duo thing where they're walking toward the camera and like "fighting" over who gets to stand in front. Whatever it was, has anyone seen this promo? Has it been used?
I mean Zoella and Joe are also the actual vloggers out of the bunch so I kind of hope they win, if Deppy are vloggers I am an esteemed published author for having a couple e-bookscorn flakes wrote:I don't think they are gonna win as zoella and joe are gonna push their subs to vote and we know deppy . It's interesting and if the rules have changed maybe we can still hope for the return of deppy . . I think that it would be interesting to see if deppy talks about it,also just realized that I assumed that here what counts it's the votes from people.mez29 wrote:This is interesting. I've just been looking up the terms and conditions for the nominations and this is what it is for the vlog category this year:danphil333 wrote: look who else is nominated for the BBC teen awards. they are ONE vlogger.![]()
i think thats the first time they are nominated.
does that mean they are no longer working for the BBC?
So Phil wouldn't have qualified last year for two reasons, and Dan for one.
I'm not going to try drawing any conclusions from this, but … interesting.
