Page 14 of 40

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:54 am
by Anonymousse
oqua wrote:
Also, when I make a tumblr post about this, should I mention IDB at all? And should I include an image of the other transcribed rules (the first three, which are pretty certain), or just focus on the "Dan Lester" aspect of it?
1) Only if you want to
2) Would make you look like an even creepier stalker


Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:54 am
by SquishPhan
Martina wrote:
mez29 wrote:remember this? maybe Getty Images knew something we didn't

The finebros too
Image

Dan's videos, twl, buttcrack and now married!phan? This has been a good week.
I love this thread.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:55 am
by majitzu
sweetmm wrote:I am OK with butt talk and pics of butt underwear covered, but please no visual butt cracks :facepalm:

I just wake up, and there is 3 more pages I has not read, but I'm with you sweetmm

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:56 am
by Anonymousse
Martina wrote:
mez29 wrote:
Image
Dan's videos, twl, buttcrack and now married!phan? This has been a good week.
FAKE.


Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:57 am
by spider
SquishPhan wrote:
Martina wrote:Dan's videos, twl, buttcrack and now married!phan? This has been a good week.
I love this thread.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:57 am
by akui
mez29 wrote:remember this? maybe Getty Images knew something we didn't

Well, they are the worlds biggest photo agency for a reason.
majitzu wrote:
sweetmm wrote:I am OK with butt talk and pics of butt underwear covered, but please no visual butt cracks :facepalm:

I just wake up, and there is 3 more pages I has not read, but I'm with you sweetmm
Third me up girls! I just don't like seeing people's naked butt unless i'm on a porn site.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:58 am
by angrymob
But which conspiracy theory is true? Are they married or secret brothers trying to throw us off?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:01 pm
by mysterylovescompany
I want to be sensible and look at this with my Phan goggles definitely off, but ... *squints* ... the writing kind of does look like Dan Lester. What. Also, catching up on this whole thread has had me in stitches.

Someone earlier brought up how Dan writes his 't's really short, not jutting above the imaginary middle line. By that logic, Dan's scrawl does not look like Lester to me, because the 't' should not be a tall letter. But I'm having trouble fathoming it as Dan Howell, unless the Howell part is cramped and has a weird squiggle after it. Idk...

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:01 pm
by jhamba
Martina wrote:
mez29 wrote:remember this? maybe Getty Images knew something we didn't

The finebros too
Image

Dan's videos, twl, buttcrack and now married!phan? This has been a good week.
This is photoshopped

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:02 pm
by Winterbury
@oqua: ahh, thank you, I'm a bad fan haha
I was just about to make my point... but then I realized that I was looking at the wrong picture. (the one where you tried to fit Dan's complete name onto the screenshot) Well done @me. Let's just pretend this never happened because now that I'm looking at the right picture, I can't unsee the Lester either. /goes back into hiding/

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:08 pm
by angrymob
mysterylovescompany wrote:I want to be sensible and look at this with my Phan goggles definitely off, but ... *squints* ... the writing kind of does look like Dan Lester. What. Also, catching up on this whole thread has had me in stitches.

Someone earlier brought up how Dan writes his 't's really short, not jutting above the imaginary middle line. By that logic, Dan's scrawl does not look like Lester to me, because the 't' should not be a tall letter. But I'm having trouble fathoming it as Dan Howell, unless the Howell part is cramped and has a weird squiggle after it. Idk...
It's possible he drops some letters when he signs his name and just draws a line of some squiggles at the end. My name is 16 letters long, but in my signature only 6 of them are probably recognizable as the original letters. Usually l's and such do stay when that happens in most people's signatures, but I could possibly see it when he has three loopy characters in a row at the end.

The fact that any of you can get anything out of those scribbles in the first place is kind of amazing tbh.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:17 pm
by spider
mysterylovescompany wrote:Someone earlier brought up how Dan writes his 't's really short, not jutting above the imaginary middle line. By that logic, Dan's scrawl does not look like Lester to me, because the 't' should not be a tall letter. But I'm having trouble fathoming it as Dan Howell, unless the Howell part is cramped and has a weird squiggle after it. Idk...
This is true but there are only samples of Dan's printed handwriting. His cursive might look different. Anyone know if Tabinof or anything else has examples of Dan writing in cursive?
angrymob wrote:It's possible he drops some letters when he signs his name and just draws a line of some squiggles at the end.
If they aren't letters then the squiggles are written as long as his last name and at about the same height. There's not much space between the capital letter of the last name and the last tall letter for the 'owe' in 'Howell'. The last tall letter also looks like one letter and not the 'll' of 'Howell'. In his printed handwriting his 'l's are pretty tall.
Image
aside it's hard to see anything other than 'Dan Lester'. 'Dan Howlter' at a stretch but the first letter of the last name looks suspiciously like an 'L'. 'Dan Lesthow' maybe. :?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:21 pm
by mez29
spider wrote: aside it's hard to see anything other than 'Dan Lester'. 'Dan Howlter' at a stretch but the first letter of the last name looks suspiciously like an 'L'. 'Dan Lesthow' maybe. :?
Started writing Lester, realised it was wrong halfway through so he switched to his actual name, but then got distracted and didn't finish writing it.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:30 pm
by iero
i just caught up with the thread and i'm laughing so hard. i'm convinced it actually says 'dan lester', it looks like it so much and i can't see anything else

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:39 pm
by Martina
jhamba wrote:
Martina wrote:
mez29 wrote:remember this? maybe Getty Images knew something we didn't

The finebros too
Image

Dan's videos, twl, buttcrack and now married!phan? This has been a good week.
jhamba wrote:This is photoshopped
[/quote]
Oh you're right. Soz, I should have checked the video :tsk:
akui wrote:
mez29 wrote:remember this? maybe Getty Images knew something we didn't

Well, they are the worlds biggest photo agency for a reason.
Exactly. A quick google search would tell you that it's Howell. Did they just assume they were married/related? How do you even make that mistake?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:40 pm
by angrymob
I just stared at it for 5 minutes, and I'm in. It looks so much like Lester. If that's the case though, I'm surprised it'd even show up multiple times in their videos. Would they be that entangled in each other's lives that they couldn't catch possible slip-ups imagine all the things they did hide then.

or it was a joke and it was before Dan was no homo.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:45 pm
by swofro
I know this is just me reaching too far but I just got a new idea. What if it is DanJamesHowell but super condense?

Like this
DanJamesHowell

By the logic that Dan write his l as tall as other letter, this might make more sense. But I can't explain why his H is like that. Hahahaha.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:50 pm
by lilMango
Jeez, what a topic to wake up to!
+1 on the "Dan Lester" boat. It's all I can see now.
Far-fetched idea, although I suppose this entire thing is far-fetched, but whatevs What if Dan was being a grumpy-poo and wouldn't sign the rules sheet, so Phil attempted to do it for him and wrote his last name instead?
Idk. At this point, I'm just trying to see the anti-phan side of this, but I really can't

Edit: Good idea, swofro, it would be mighty squished though.... and I have a feeling Dan would take up more space if he decided to write it like that.

I'm excited for the tipsy talk video though!!!!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:52 pm
by Anonymousse
swofro wrote:I know this is just me reaching too far but I just got a new idea. What if it is DanJamesHowell but super condense?

Like this
DanJamesHowell

By the logic that Dan write his l as tall as other letter, this might make more sense. But I can't explain why his H is like that. Hahahaha.
Those l-s have to be really-really small then, for that to work.

Nope, not buying it.

soma - Sorry for Up-Quoting you but I don't want to Spam - Howl has been disproven... There only a handfull of explanations and Dan Lester seems to be the most logical one. (tho I'm still totally agnostic at the idea)


Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:53 pm
by soma
Hmm Dans characters name in Guild Wars (at least I think it's him) is called "Howl", so maybe he drops a few letters when signing stuff like angrymob said? ...or let's just stick with Dan Lester

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:55 pm
by angrymob
lilMango wrote:Jeez, what a topic to wake up to!
+1 on the "Dan Lester" boat. It's all I can see now.
Far-fetched idea, although I suppose this entire thing is far-fetched, but whatevs What if Dan was being a grumpy-poo and wouldn't sign the rules sheet, so Phil attempted to do it for him and wrote his last name instead?
Idk. At this point, I'm just trying to see the anti-phan side of this, but I really can't

Edit: Good idea, swofro, it would be mighty squished though.... and I have a feeling Dan would take up more space if he decided to write it like that.

I'm excited for the tipsy talk video though!!!!
I appreciate how we're trying so hard to find any other explanation than it being D Lester.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:56 pm
by oqua
Anonymousse wrote:
swofro wrote:I know this is just me reaching too far but I just got a new idea. What if it is DanJamesHowell but super condense?

Like this
DanJamesHowell

By the logic that Dan write his l as tall as other letter, this might make more sense. But I can't explain why his H is like that. Hahahaha.
Those l-s have to be really-really small then, for that to work.

Nope, not buying it.
I tried this hours ago and rejected it, but now that you've mentioned it I'll post my attempt:

Image

I don't buy it either.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 12:59 pm
by Anonymousse
oqua wrote: I tried this hours ago and rejected it, but now that you've mentioned it I'll post my attempt:
Image
I don't buy it either.
1) That is a mess, if it is true.
2) It seems that it definitely says Dan not Daniel
3) I have to check on those l-s on TABINOF


Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 1:01 pm
by oqua
Anonymousse wrote:
oqua wrote: I tried this hours ago and rejected it, but now that you've mentioned it I'll post my attempt:
Image
I don't buy it either.
1) That is a mess, if it is true.
2) It seems that it definitely says Dan not Daniel
3) I have to check on those l-s on TABINOF
Spider already posted a picture showing his printing l's. But yeah, I'm going to check TABINOF too and see if there are any cursive samples whatsoever.

And yeah, "Daniel" is a big stretch, but to me it's almost unthinkable that he would write "Dan James Howell."

Re: Dan & Phil Part 4: The Cheekiest Link

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 1:06 pm
by phamnotof
oqua wrote:
Anonymousse wrote:
oqua wrote: I tried this hours ago and rejected it, but now that you've mentioned it I'll post my attempt:
Image
I don't buy it either.
1) That is a mess, if it is true.
2) It seems that it definitely says Dan not Daniel
3) I have to check on those l-s on TABINOF
Spider already posted a picture showing his printing l's. But yeah, I'm going to check TABINOF too and see if there are any cursive samples whatsoever.

And yeah, "Daniel" is a big stretch, but to me it's almost unthinkable that he would write "Dan James Howell."
I mean, just looking at how huge the 'l' in Daniel would be compared to the 'll' in Howell... And his 'l' is rather tall, as previously discussed, which is why Howell just doesn't work for me no matter how we spin it. I'd sooner see it as 'Dan Fucker', tbh.