IDB

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

I wanted to say that it's a hint that they should get a baby, but I don't trust them with one right now.

Also I just use adblock, so I luckily don't get any of those annoying adds.

SquishPhan wrote:

I'll be in the bed, no bunk, I mean bunk

(I don't understand enough about busgate to make effective busgate jokes, but I tried anyway)

This may all be slightly offtopic now?:
I know someone was saying earlier that they were uncomfortable with busgate. But I don't think even busgate was that bad because even if we did find out they shared a bed, so what? It doesn't really prove that they are together or anything, as they could have been just 'top and tailing' so to speak - friends can share a bed. It wouldn't cause a huge stir, and there are way more suggestive pieces of information out there on the internet which point to phan if people are looking for it - one more piece isn't going to make any difference. I think would be uncomfortable with it yes, but I think they'd be uncomfortable with the whole forum so

I don't necessarily think know about this forum (at least I hope not). Also just because Dan read it out in the chat doesn't mean he's going to go and look up what it means, as he reads out so many things he probably forgets and is preoccupied, and probably assumes most of it is meaningless - for example he also read out 'tomato daddies' and he's probably not going to look up that

I think this is a nice forum, there are no real hate posts and everyone is very respectful. Even when there are posts from people who don't like them, there are always other more positive posts to balance it out, and it is unrealistic to expect everyone to be pleased all the time and wouldn't be very interesting I have lurked here and a tiny bit on GG and the difference to me was enormous. When I lurked on GG I found it very critical and hateful of Dan - or maybe that was just a few particular people or those specific moments in time or something. But then when I lurked here I thought you were all hilarious and all seemed very fair.

Having said that I think Dan wouldn't like this forum just because I know he has said a lot about not stalking his past, not analyzing things he does, etc - which is part of what goes on here. I don't think posts like danphil333's would bother him because he has a thick skin to deal with hate - I think it would be more the speculation on phan and analyzing, and he may get upset when he sees fans saying negative things about him. I'm only speaking about Dan because I don't think I know enough about Phil to make a judgement about how he might feel because I watch him less often

But I don't think either of them would have time to lurk here, since there are about 40ish pages a thread and there are so many threads, and they are busy touring, making videos, writing books and keeping tabs on the rest of the phandom.
So I think we're safe

Thank you missemma for posting the liveshow link

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

bluebox-away wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

They totally have been.

bluebox-away wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

For other sites yes but for youtube? I keep getting this pregnant test ad and at 2a.m horror movies ones :wtf: it's a joke or it's a tipical philly situation?

corn flakes wrote:

bluebox-away wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

For other sites yes but for youtube? I keep getting this pregnant test ad and at 2a.m horror movies ones :wtf:

it's a jock or it's a tipical philly situation?

Someone signed him up for babycentre pregnancy tracker emails a while back

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

[offtopic]You can block the shitty auto play ads on the new xkit extension for Firefox. https://new-xkit-extension.tumblr.com/faq Yes, I did just come out of lurking to say this. I strongly sympathize with you Ickle. [/offtopic]

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

corn flakes wrote:

bluebox-away wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

For other sites yes but for youtube? I keep getting this pregnant test ad and at 2a.m horror movies ones :wtf:

it's a jock or it's a tipical philly situation?

Someone signed him up for babycentre pregnancy tracker emails a while back

Only phil
Thank you here a phil retweet of a dog I missed,I want it:

alittledizzy wrote:Since it slowed down drastically in here - something else I liked about the livestream was Dan shouting out Shitty Watercolour and saying he thought they'd be friends based on the guy's non-youtube-fanart work. I really think it's true. He's an amazing artist and his sense of humor is a lot like Dan's.

His reaction to Dan saying that was also adorable and almost instantaneous, too. Either he watches Dan's livestreams or people started tweeting him about it immediately.

He was watching! I use younow through my twitter and since I follow SW can see if he's watching too and he's been at the last few liveshows (I can't remember if I've seen him at Phil's too..).

These are the sort of paintings Dan was talking about, very in line with his own issues: He's pretty great.

Filming a new pokemon go today then..?! Hope that goes up soon, and glad they're not waiting for Dan's full cosplay outfit to arrive from wherever the hell it's being shipped from!

Also, figures they'd be out and about in London today when I was there yesterday and will be there Saturday

Speedo Challenge:

This is the closest I can find to purple tie dye -

http://www.swimoutlet.com/p/speedo-spla ... m_page.rr1

corn flakes wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

corn flakes wrote:

bluebox-away wrote:

IckleMissMayhem wrote:

Monetized blogs are a-coming. I'm just waiting for a firefox extension to block the sneaky little fuckers blasting out of my feedpage, because it is IRRITATING AF! (And fucking confusing and scary when you're on pain meds!!)

Aren't ads usually based on your browsing/search history?
I'm mostly kidding no I'm not they've totally been googling baby related search terms, right??

For other sites yes but for youtube? I keep getting this pregnant test ad and at 2a.m horror movies ones :wtf:

it's a jock or it's a tipical philly situation?

Someone signed him up for babycentre pregnancy tracker emails a while back

Only phil
Thank you here a phil retweet of a dog I missed,I want it:

That thing looks like an Ewok.

bluebox-away wrote:

Filming a new pokemon go today then..?! Hope that goes up soon, and glad they're not waiting for Dan's full cosplay outfit to arrive from wherever the hell it's being shipped from!

Also, figures they'd be out and about in London today when I was there yesterday and will be there Saturday

I think/hope that this means that we are getting a new pokemon go video soon.

That's bad luck on your part, maybe it will happen and you'll get too meet them another day.

uglyamerican wrote:Speedo Challenge:

This is the closest I can find to purple tie dye -

http://www.swimoutlet.com/p/speedo-spla ... m_page.rr1

They should wear these.

I think these pretty much fit the requirements don't they?

Found at https://www.theswimteamstore.com/produc ... p48276.htm

More Phanimation goodness

Or this one:

http://www.swimoutlet.com/p/speedo-turn ... m_page.rr2

POKÉMON ALERT!!! Some guy who met Deppy in the park today tweeted and deleted saying they're both Team Mystic. THIS IS NOT A DRILL!

Told you they'd up and join Mystic together.
And yeah the guy could've made it up and yada yada fact check snore.

Wish I lived in London so I could follow them around and cap all their gyms.

They've had a good run of videos being filmed and then edited and posted within 2-3 days lately, I'm hoping Pokemon is the same and we might see it tomorrow or Friday.

You think the guy got one of Phil's famous DMS telling him to delete or else!?

bluewho wrote: This may all be slightly offtopic now?:
I know someone was saying earlier that they were uncomfortable with busgate. But I don't think even busgate was that bad because even if we did find out they shared a bed, so what? It doesn't really prove that they are together or anything, as they could have been just 'top and tailing' so to speak - friends can share a bed. It wouldn't cause a huge stir, and there are way more suggestive pieces of information out there on the internet which point to phan if people are looking for it - one more piece isn't going to make any difference. I think would be uncomfortable with it yes, but I think they'd be uncomfortable with the whole forum so

I think that was me. It wasn't the information that could have been found from busgate that I had a problem with it was how the information was being sought. I think ringing the bus company to find out how their buses are configured to figure out how 's bus possibly is is invasive and borderline stalking. It made me uncomfortable and I think if had read it they would be very freaked out. I'm not trying to tell people what they can and can't do but just expressing my distaste but lets not bring that up again!

SquishPhan wrote:

This whole exchange plus shitty watercolours reply is giving me life.

bluebox-away wrote:

Filming a new pokemon go today then..?! Hope that goes up soon, and glad they're not waiting for Dan's full cosplay outfit to arrive from wherever the hell it's being shipped from!

Also, figures they'd be out and about in London today when I was there yesterday and will be there Saturday

I'm really attracted to Dan in this photo even with his terrible side pose and peace sign ugh

timtam wrote:

bluewho wrote: This may all be slightly offtopic now?:
I know someone was saying earlier that they were uncomfortable with busgate. But I don't think even busgate was that bad because even if we did find out they shared a bed, so what? It doesn't really prove that they are together or anything, as they could have been just 'top and tailing' so to speak - friends can share a bed. It wouldn't cause a huge stir, and there are way more suggestive pieces of information out there on the internet which point to phan if people are looking for it - one more piece isn't going to make any difference. I think would be uncomfortable with it yes, but I think they'd be uncomfortable with the whole forum so

I think that was me. It wasn't the information that could have been found from busgate that I had a problem with it was how the information was being sought. I think ringing the bus company to find out how their buses are configured to figure out how 's bus possibly is is invasive and borderline stalking. It made me uncomfortable and I think if had read it they would be very freaked out. I'm not trying to tell people what they can and can't do but just expressing my distaste but lets not bring that up again!

^ I didn't know about this, needless to say it changes my opinion somewhat. Consider it dropped.

for god's sake, this again?, no one rang the bus company, someone used the contact part of their website to ask if they had buses with two bedrooms to which they obviously said no, as you could easily see on their website, it just confirmed what we already knew and they didn't ask for dan and phil especially, jeez, stop blowing things out of proportion

it also rubs me the wrong way how when people were investigating busgate y'all were like 'omg praise the idb sherlocks', and even the ones who stayed quiet were reading it all, guess your moral high ground isn't really that high

and apparently busgate is also to blame for them possibly disliking idb? because apparently reading the fucking sticker their bus had that said the bus company's name from picture someone else took while sitting at home on the opposite side of the world is next level stalking, a lot worse than people discussing how easy is to find their address and how dangerous that was while they were in america, or posting the name of the hotel they were staying at in la //while they were still there//, maybe i'm crazy but if i was deppy that would concern me more than people trying to find a bus layout

oh and also discussing their sex lives isn't invasive at all obviously



tl,dr: yeah i agree they wouldn't really like idb (i think they would be kinda proud it exists tho, and i think most of the criticism comes from a good place and could be useful to them), but jesus christ stop demonizing certain aspects of the conversation while completely ignoring other topics that are equally or more invasive

trashqueen wrote:for god's sake, this again?, no one rang the bus company, someone used the contact part of their website to ask if they had buses with two bedrooms to which they obviously said no, as you could easily see on their website, it just confirmed what we already knew and they didn't ask for dan and phil especially, jeez, stop blowing things out of proportion

trashqueen wrote:tl,dr: yeah i agree they wouldn't really like idb (i think they would be kinda proud it exists tho, and i think most of the criticism comes from a good place and could be useful to them), but jesus christ stop demonizing certain aspects of the conversation while completely ignoring other topics that are equally or more invasive

Strongly agree with both of these statements.

trashqueen wrote:for god's sake, this again?, no one rang the bus company, someone used the contact part of their website to ask if they had buses with two bedrooms to which they obviously said no, as you could easily see on their website, it just confirmed what we already knew and they didn't ask for dan and phil especially, jeez, stop blowing things out of proportion

it also rubs me the wrong way how when people were investigating busgate y'all were like 'omg praise the idb sherlocks', and even the ones who stayed quiet were reading it all, guess your moral high ground isn't really that high

and apparently busgate is also to blame for them possibly disliking idb? because apparently reading the fucking sticker their bus had that said the bus company's name from picture someone else took while sitting at home on the opposite side of the world is next level stalking, a lot worse than people discussing how easy is to find their address and how dangerous that was while they were in america, or posting the name of the hotel they were staying at in la //while they were still there//, maybe i'm crazy but if i was deppy that would concern me more than people trying to find a bus layout

oh and also discussing their sex lives isn't invasive at all obviously



tl,dr: yeah i agree they wouldn't really like idb (i think they would be kinda proud it exists tho, and i think most of the criticism comes from a good place and could be useful to them), but jesus christ stop demonizing certain aspects of the conversation while completely ignoring other topics that are equally or more invasive

What makes you think the same people praising busgate are the ones criticizing it now. And yeah discussing their address is creepy af. Where is the disagreement here?
You can say that bus gate did no harm but that doesn't mean it didn't seem kinda creepy
Also don't think people discuss their sex lives too much but that is still different than stalking/ sherlocking.