@9:51 "Earlier we taught Louise what a furry is..."
Poor Louise, she was probably traumatized by that afternoon.

definitely agree with this last paragraph. tbh most youtubers seem like they're just "work friends" - louise, tyler, cat, felix (even tho dan wishes it was more than that with him lol). the only youtuber i can see them being actual friends with - the kind that hang out outside of work-related things and have had a consistently strong friendship - is pj. and they don't really hang out much anymore, do they? and i guess bryony, but she hasn't been a youtuber for years.Diyes_Celine wrote:Seriously. It was only entertaining for a minute. I have nothing to add about their furry references.secretagentphan wrote:THIS FURRY DISCUSSION HAS GOTTEN SO OUT OF HAND I AM LIVING
I am more inclined to say that Louise is not really Dan's friend. Unless we are using the word friend for every person more than an acquintance. She is more of an office mate who you hangout with at work. But once work is over, you barely contact each other. I can't really explain it but for me their relationship is purely professional. It's just that Dan is comfortable with Louise similar to his relationship with Tomska.
Its a continuation of his BONCA's speech where he acknowledges Dan as being a major part of his lifemajitzu wrote:Seriously ... seriously 3 pages of furry discussion smh
Phil's twitter moments is cute
Yeahh it make me feel all fluffy inside when I saw it in the morningsweetmm wrote:Its a continuation of his BONCA's speech where he acknowledges Dan as being a major part of his lifemajitzu wrote:Seriously ... seriously 3 pages of furry discussion smh
Phil's twitter moments is cute
Phil does not say much but his actions speak louder than Dan's constant #1 trash talk
Yeah Peej is their only IRL friend who is a youtuber currently; I do think Dan struggles to develop not only friendship but even close acquaintances amongst the youtubers. Even within his own management circle, I think the only person he can talk to is Tomska. I do think he used the gamingmas excuse to bail the party early. However I do think Cat is a friend eventhough she may be closer to Phil due to the long history between them, moreover Phil seems to trust Cat and this will rub on Dan.silverwinter wrote:definitely agree with this last paragraph. tbh most youtubers seem like they're just "work friends" - louise, tyler, cat, felix (even tho dan wishes it was more than that with him lol). the only youtuber i can see them being actual friends with - the kind that hang out outside of work-related things and have had a consistently strong friendship - is pj. and they don't really hang out much anymore, do they? and i guess bryony, but she hasn't been a youtuber for years.
Completely agree with this, I mean in the past Dan as struggled intensely with issues surrounding stigmatization of sexuality, its taken him so long to get to point he is now (hi 2012! dan, completely unable to acknowledge some points of his personality) whowever when he does it tends to be humor led. No idea if he is furry/interest in fandom/some kind of animal play, likely we will never know but if humour in past has helped him just get more comfortable parts of him im more for more of this topic.Maya wrote: *cough* Also, just a little reminder that Dan has a shrine in his bedroom where most items are related to an anthropomorphic character, Rytlock. *cough*
Being part of the furry fandom doesn't necessarily mean wearing a fursuit 24/7. We don't know if he is interested and what kind of interest he has. Who knows, maybe jokes, onesies, furry mentions, his shrine- all of those things are hints of something. Sadly, the furry fandom is one of the most stigmatized, so I can totally see his jokes as a way to deal with this topic.
Maybe he just doesn't want to have people making assumptions. Also never underestimate the power of social anxiety to keep someone from being chummy.sweetmm wrote:I also noticed the openly gay British youtuber such as Jimmy and Doug are pretty chummy with Phil, however Dan seems to stay clear of them. Is it because he wished not to be associated with them?
sweetmm wrote:Yeah Peej is their only IRL friend who is a youtuber currently; I do think Dan struggles to develop not only friendship but even close acquaintances amongst the youtubers. Even within his own management circle, I think the only person he can talk to is Tomska. I do think he used the gamingmas excuse to bail the party early. However I do think Cat is a friend eventhough she may be closer to Phil due to the long history between them, moreover Phil seems to trust Cat and this will rub on Dan.silverwinter wrote:definitely agree with this last paragraph. tbh most youtubers seem like they're just "work friends" - louise, tyler, cat, felix (even tho dan wishes it was more than that with him lol). the only youtuber i can see them being actual friends with - the kind that hang out outside of work-related things and have had a consistently strong friendship - is pj. and they don't really hang out much anymore, do they? and i guess bryony, but she hasn't been a youtuber for years.
I also noticed the openly gay British youtuber such as Jimmy and Doug are pretty chummy with Phil, however Dan seems to stay clear of them. Is it because he wished not to be associated with them?
I recently watched back the periscope that Evan took at the BONCA and what amused me is when Phil came up the stage and Evan immediately said (something like) "That's the brain". It made me wonder if the London youtube community regards as Beauty & Brain, and if so how it affects Dan (assuming he is aware).
Wait what kinds of assumptions would people make that Dan would care about?PhilsEyelash wrote:Maybe he just doesn't want to have people making assumptions. Also never underestimate the power of social anxiety to keep someone from being chummy.sweetmm wrote:I also noticed the openly gay British youtuber such as Jimmy and Doug are pretty chummy with Phil, however Dan seems to stay clear of them. Is it because he wished not to be associated with them?
I sound like the Dan defense force. I swear I'm not...
Yeah plus I feel like Dan's one of those people who doesn't seek people out you know not including "stalk him until he loves you though Like I feel like if they tried to make a connection with him he'd be polite but he's not about to approach people (same Dan). I've always respected Dan for that in a way because both him and Phil aren't really youtube whores (excuse my language) when it comes to piggybacking off of other youtubers and collabs. I think that's mostly because they get used a lot though which is kind of sad.fancybum wrote:Wait what kinds of assumptions would people make that Dan would care about?PhilsEyelash wrote:Maybe he just doesn't want to have people making assumptions. Also never underestimate the power of social anxiety to keep someone from being chummy.sweetmm wrote:I also noticed the openly gay British youtuber such as Jimmy and Doug are pretty chummy with Phil, however Dan seems to stay clear of them. Is it because he wished not to be associated with them?
I sound like the Dan defense force. I swear I'm not...
And mostly baseless speculation on my part: Doug just seems really boring and I don't think Jimmy likes Dan all that much. They just happen to share management with Doug and talk to him at work events
I don't get the impression any of them are all that chummy on an actual personal level. And #Phimmy is just a beautiful dream.
This is interesting - however I don't think the YT community sees Dan as the "beauty" as such (although he is,, quite a beauty). I just think that Phil is the one who comes up with a lot of ideas behind the scenes - whether it be for D+P themselves or the entire YT community *cough* 7secondchallenge *cough* tumblrtagsweetmm wrote:I recently watched back the periscope that Evan took at the BONCA and what amused me is when Phil came up the stage and Evan immediately said (something like) "That's the brain". It made me wonder if the London youtube community regards as Beauty & Brain, and if so how it affects Dan (assuming he is aware).
momoroki wrote:This is interesting - however I don't think the YT community sees Dan as the "beauty" as such (although he is,, quite a beauty). I just think that Phil is the one who comes up with a lot of ideas behind the scenes - whether it be for D+P themselves or the entire YT community *cough* 7secondchallenge *cough* tumblrtagsweetmm wrote:I recently watched back the periscope that Evan took at the BONCA and what amused me is when Phil came up the stage and Evan immediately said (something like) "That's the brain". It made me wonder if the London youtube community regards as Beauty & Brain, and if so how it affects Dan (assuming he is aware).
Either that, or it could be a reference to Puppet Master!Phil theory which I think was discussed in gg once and is my favourite conspiracy theory to date
well "hey buddy you in london" became a meme for months so...it seems to me that literally anything he does / anyone he talks to can become meme material. anything from phan!divorce bc he's talking to another man or idk...it just seems like things can quickly become fraught with drama in dan-world unlike teflon philfancybum wrote: Wait what kinds of assumptions would people make that Dan would care about?
Ahhhh I wish I had taken screenshots, because it was a real good discussion all in all, but I only vaguely remember the theory too.secretagentphan wrote:momoroki wrote:This is interesting - however I don't think the YT community sees Dan as the "beauty" as such (although he is,, quite a beauty). I just think that Phil is the one who comes up with a lot of ideas behind the scenes - whether it be for D+P themselves or the entire YT community *cough* 7secondchallenge *cough* tumblrtagsweetmm wrote:I recently watched back the periscope that Evan took at the BONCA and what amused me is when Phil came up the stage and Evan immediately said (something like) "That's the brain". It made me wonder if the London youtube community regards as Beauty & Brain, and if so how it affects Dan (assuming he is aware).
Either that, or it could be a reference to Puppet Master!Phil theory which I think was discussed in gg once and is my favourite conspiracy theory to date
Ooooh I vaguely remember reading this but completely forget. Please explain this theory if you don't mind
Here's another one @ 59s : https://youtu.be/4JYst_vKliMmermaid blood wrote: ps. if anyone wants Jimmy's mentions of attraction to Dan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GLvmF_ ... el=felucca
3.48 - 6.02
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBgtUAx ... CerealTime
5.25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UujlBK ... helsandJim
9.19
there are two more but i can't find the links.
I've actually been wondering/thinking about this topic for a while, especially the part I bolded. I'm a bit too lazy atm to go find receipts (maybe I'll try tomorrow) but there seems to be a lot of instances where dan's discussed only in context of his looks, but in a different way than how most male youtubers are treated (at least from what I've noticed). please correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not an avid fan of any other youtubers, but it seems youtubers don't focus on the looks of attractive male youtubers (only person I can think of is casper lee for some reason). they will obviously comment, but in a more typical "oh haha he's cute, he works out, he gets all the #ladies" type way.mermaid blood wrote:i think the mastermind theory lost a lot of steam though post tatinof/tabinof.
it's fun to think about in a fictional sort of way, but we don't really have that much concrete evidence. even going back to SAP and radioshow they were coming up with content for both.
i do think dan suffers from sexism and objectification (from peers and fans) that isn't taken seriously being that he's male, even Phil addressed it (rather forcefully) in a 2012 joint liveshow asking the viewers if they only watched him 'for his face'. but it seems tempered with opinions showing respect for them being the first youtubers to do something as huge as radio with the BBC, and an original stage production and book when others were taking distant/manufactured/ghost created approaches.
ps. if anyone wants Jimmy's mentions of attraction to Dan:
i don't know if this has been discussed already either, but i think you made some interesting points. i also feel like this ties in with parts of their joint audience assuming/making comments about how dan has more subscribers because of his looks which is something i've read quite often with the intent of defending phil/wanting him to get more subscribers. i guess we can all agree that this is nonsense on many levels, but i suppose it's coming from the same place even if it's meant with a good intent.dontpanic wrote:I've actually been wondering/thinking about this topic for a while, especially the part I bolded. I'm a bit too lazy atm to go find receipts (maybe I'll try tomorrow) but there seems to be a lot of instances where dan's discussed only in context of his looks, but in a different way than how most male youtubers are treated (at least from what I've noticed).mermaid blood wrote:i think the mastermind theory lost a lot of steam though post tatinof/tabinof.
it's fun to think about in a fictional sort of way, but we don't really have that much concrete evidence. even going back to SAP and radioshow they were coming up with content for both.
i do think dan suffers from sexism and objectification (from peers and fans) that isn't taken seriously being that he's male, even Phil addressed it (rather forcefully) in a 2012 joint liveshow asking the viewers if they only watched him 'for his face'. but it seems tempered with opinions showing respect for them being the first youtubers to do something as huge as radio with the BBC, and an original stage production and book when others were taking distant/manufactured/ghost created approaches.
ps. if anyone wants Jimmy's mentions of attraction to Dan:
I absolutely agree, people treat him in an unacceptable way but get away with it because he is "a dude". Imagine if someone just came near Zoella and casually started grinding on her while she lookеd vaguely uncomfortable? There would be an outrage. I think Dan suffers a lot from people assuming that pretty = dumb and therefore Phil must be the brains behind the operation because he is ugly, therefore smart. This is however not helped by the "dan girls" who are subbed to him for his look and the accent, not because they find his content in any way interesting.dontpanic wrote: I've actually been wondering/thinking about this topic for a while, especially the part I bolded. I'm a bit too lazy atm to go find receipts (maybe I'll try tomorrow) but there seems to be a lot of instances where dan's discussed only in context of his looks, but in a different way than how most male youtubers are treated (at least from what I've noticed). please correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not an avid fan of any other youtubers, but it seems youtubers don't focus on the looks of attractive male youtubers (only person I can think of is casper lee for some reason). they will obviously comment, but in a more typical "oh haha he's cute, he works out, he gets all the #ladies" type way.
Dan gets sexualized in a different way where, if he were a woman, would be seen as disgusting/offensive/I can't think of the right word. The only specific examples I can cite with certainty is the whole onion debacle (ugh), shane dawson's comments, and the vidcon laughing at/with us panel. in all three examples dan is objectified in a way no one else is in the videos.
the vidcon panel is a strong example of this--the crowds cheer louder for dan than the others, and the host automatically acts like the audience are fans of dan's appearence and not dan as a creator.
while it's not the only time shane discusses dan in a sexual way, in the vid where shane watches youdatubers' first video, shane uses explicit sexual language to describe dan, and while he recycles a couple of the jokes to describe felix it's not treated the same way. in these situations people find dan's treatment fine/funny, while if someone like zoella was treated the exact same way it would be seen as extremely problematic.
Even in offhanded/quick comments dan's appearance is often what's mentioned. the only specific example I can cite off the top of my head is from the boncas vlog tomska made, where he shows how watch time was higher when dan and phil appeared. The only comment he made was how dan looked pretty i mean, he's not lying. this seems like it's not a big deal, but this is just one example of something that happens quite often.
I'm sorry, this has all prob been talked about before, and I can't even remember why i thought this would be worth talking about. although i do wonder why it's dan who's treated this way?