Page 21 of 41

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:42 am
by SquishPhan
I know it doesn't really mean a lot, but I'm still super happy that Phil has 4 million subscribers now. :yippee:

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:07 pm
by rizzo
4 for you, Phil Coco!

Image

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:14 pm
by captainspacecoat
Yay, I'm so happy for him!!! I hope he is having a lovely day

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:44 pm
by fancybum
zvezdochka wrote: I wouldn't call it queerbaiting as it is, but "Ha-ha, we've been having sexy sex time!" is a punchline here.

I fully agree with you on the rest of the post though . D&P live in one of the most liberal countries, and yet, they choose not to clear up any rumours about their relationship. They have their right not to do so, but I, as a straight ally from Russia (a place where you can get brutally murdered for being gay, unless you're loaded and don't go outside where the plebs are), can't help but be puzzled by it.

Even putting that frustration aside, I still need a reason for their ambiguity. I'm not saying that if you're queer you should come out. I'm saying, if you capitalize on your public image and a big part of that image is your relationship with your friend, you should be transparent about it. But that's my personal naive viewpoint and, I guess, I will never grow up :D
One recent tweet as evidence of them intentionally exploiting the ambiguousness of their relationship for profit? If they did out their relationship, would that tweet be fine, or would it still not be okay? Are they only allowed to make sexual jokes potentially involving the other only as long as we actually know they're boning?

You need a reason for the ambiguity. Of their relationship or their sexualities? Because the two are linked, talking about one (in a label-y way) naturally brings to mind the question of the other. They want to keep their relationship for themselves, but they are a duo (presented/marketed as a friendship (& roommates TRUE)) so the relationship they share with the audience through their work is their friendship. The ambiguity arises (if one thinks they're together blahedy blah) because what they portray is not the whole story (obviously. even full-time vloggers aren't sharing their whole story). They don't owe anyone anymore than what they choose to put out there. So where does the frustration come from? What do you think you're owed?

I woke up on the crazy side of the bed today, this isn't all directed at you but it's been typed and on my mind so whatever:
I struggle with the idea of 'coming out' because I just have a lot of general resentment about how the world is vs how it should be (which is just an exercise in madness because the world will never be how it "should be" in my lifetime/generation, or the next, or the next, etc).

Straight people just get to be. And I lean toward the idea that Dan/Phil also just want to be. They're making their man lust mentions, they gave up the heteronormativity, they're living their lives. AND I STRUGGLE WITH THE IDEA OF ANYBODY who isn’t straight being expected as a matter of course to one day just not 'be'. It’s partially due to audience-size obviously, but Chris is bisexual/openly into dudes and it’s fine. He’s just being. If D&P had continued how they started in 2009 being casually open with not being straight (labels and all), I wonder where we would all be now. And I’m annoyed that it’s even a thing. I’m annoyed that it’s not even just the straight people who can hear the things Dan (AND Phil more and more) says/has said and say it’s disrespectful to “””””ASSUME””””” anything about their sexualities as if not perceiving somebody as straight is a terrible thing. That a sexuality outside the 'norm' could be shameful and we all need to shhhh unless they want to put it out there themselves (because what they are putting out there just isn't enough - who even decides what's 'enough'?)

And what I’m saying is why do only straight people get to not put anything out there and just exist the way they like? I mean, I know why. But I resent it. I see both sides: coming out can be a great thing, a relief, being open with who you are etc. in your personal life with people who matter to you. Sure. But publicly there’s this shift, a marker separating who you were and who you are now: as an OUT person. Are people closeted, or are people just private. Why is an “uncomfirmed” sexuality (outside of 'confirmed' (coughordefaultedbcitsthenormcough) straight) assumed HIDDEN rather than… just existing independent of our business. I guess to one day get to the point where everybody can just be. But in terms of public figures, the idea that they are either out or hiding (with the subtext of shame hanging over everything) bothers me so much. I don't know if I'm allowed to be bothered by it though while still yearning for lgbt+ representation everywhere (and lgbt+ representation apparently not existing at all without having it explicitly said over and over, labels required, for the fucking idiots out there). Like I think D&P are already normalising and representing great things, but somehow it's not enough (or even offensive to some..) to think that unless they slap a label on their foreheads.

I’m not clamoring for them both to come out (because I don't think they're crammed in some kind of shame closet to begin with), I’m watching with a hawk eye because of what I think they’re doing, and I like it and am fascinated by it (if it’s even correct). I just need to say: I look at them and see that they’re obviously together. From that observation follows the deduction that neither of them are straight (also the fact they’ve both said it but whatever whatever, time erases the meaning of specific words is something I’ve learned). It’s an observation. It’s fine. That some people react to that with demands to respect them is another pebble on the mountain of things that wears me down as a human being (that doesn't really pop up around here, but I'm having a rant). And that some people can dismiss the validity of why others think they're together with an eyeroll (or whatever Shane's video is. even after a good sleep: still bothered by it). But I can’t control what other people think, and what I can’t control shouldn’t bother me. But what other people think affects the lives of others, it affects my life, so how can I not care.

Blah blah blah this was a waste of time sorry. Did I even have a point. I understand the importance of 'coming out' obviously, on a grand scale. Representation, normalization, ation ation ation. But on the smaller scale, of the real people expected to do it (in a public fashion, more specifically), it’s a tiring idea. They’re already who they are to the people in their real personal lives who matter. To feel like you have to wake up one day and BE THIS NOW forever and people want it from you (and the nagging why of it, just to confirm a 'ship' to better enjoy their own fantasies of your private life? to freely laugh over a dumb joke tweet without some niggling frustration? why?), the thought of it just tires me out. Especially when they're already being pretty clear and open in certain ways (at least about what doesn't get too close to their own privacy).

And the larger question with D&P, if they did at some point slap some labels on their foreheads, would have to be answered in the next breath. Right? 'Coming out' would only make the real elephant in the room even larger, and that's the elephant they actually want to ignore. It's simpler to leave all the elephants alone and just keep doing what they're doing. Orrrrr they're evil queerbaiters who would have to lack all humanity and moral decency. Super plausible. Excuse me while I retch.
tl;dr - yikes word vomit, run

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:11 pm
by iero
Congrats to Phil on 4mil :D

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:44 pm
by alittledizzy
fancybum wrote:Like I think D&P are already normalising and representing great things, but somehow it's not enough (or even offensive to some..) to think that unless they slap a label on their foreheads.

I’m not clamoring for them both to come out (because I don't think they're crammed in some kind of shame closet to begin with), I’m watching with a hawk eye because of what I think they’re doing, and I like it and am fascinated by it (if it’s even correct). I just need to say: I look at them and see that they’re obviously together. From that observation follows the deduction that neither of them are straight (also the fact they’ve both said it but whatever whatever, time erases the meaning of specific words is something I’ve learned). It’s an observation. It’s fine. That some people react to that with demands to respect them is another pebble on the mountain of things that wears me down as a human being (that doesn't really pop up around here, but I'm having a rant). And that some people can dismiss the validity of why others think they're together with an eyeroll (or whatever Shane's video is. even after a good sleep: still bothered by it). But I can’t control what other people think, and what I can’t control shouldn’t bother me. But what other people think affects the lives of others, it affects my life, so how can I not care.
I just want to slow clap your entire post, but for the sake of space I'm snipping this bit out to take it out from under the spoiler. You've just summed up exactly what chord Dan and Phil strike within me that makes me so passionate about them, as people; both interest in what they're doing/how they're doing it right now and compassion for them as a people. I don't relate to much in their lives but trying to just be with my sexuality and with openness in how I love without having to constantly come out is something I aspire to even though I realize how unrealistic it is.

Coming out seems like a happy ending to the fairytale for a lot of people in phandom, and maybe coming out is a happy ending for a lot of those people. But it just feels exhausting to me, on a personal real life level. I can't even comprehend how it would feel to them, coming out to an audience that will be friend and foe alike.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:05 pm
by Amiaw
Sorry for the OT question but I've noticed that both Hannah and Hector haven't drawn/animated deppy it awhile. Do you think they are losing interest or do you think that maybe deppy asked them to stop?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:27 pm
by CallMeAyana
fancybum wrote:
zvezdochka wrote: I wouldn't call it queerbaiting as it is, but "Ha-ha, we've been having sexy sex time!" is a punchline here.

I fully agree with you on the rest of the post though . D&P live in one of the most liberal countries, and yet, they choose not to clear up any rumours about their relationship. They have their right not to do so, but I, as a straight ally from Russia (a place where you can get brutally murdered for being gay, unless you're loaded and don't go outside where the plebs are), can't help but be puzzled by it.

Even putting that frustration aside, I still need a reason for their ambiguity. I'm not saying that if you're queer you should come out. I'm saying, if you capitalize on your public image and a big part of that image is your relationship with your friend, you should be transparent about it. But that's my personal naive viewpoint and, I guess, I will never grow up :D
One recent tweet as evidence of them intentionally exploiting the ambiguousness of their relationship for profit? If they did out their relationship, would that tweet be fine, or would it still not be okay? Are they only allowed to make sexual jokes potentially involving the other only as long as we actually know they're boning?

You need a reason for the ambiguity. Of their relationship or their sexualities? Because the two are linked, talking about one (in a label-y way) naturally brings to mind the question of the other. They want to keep their relationship for themselves, but they are a duo (presented/marketed as a friendship (& roommates TRUE)) so the relationship they share with the audience through their work is their friendship. The ambiguity arises (if one thinks they're together blahedy blah) because what they portray is not the whole story (obviously. even full-time vloggers aren't sharing their whole story). They don't owe anyone anymore than what they choose to put out there. So where does the frustration come from? What do you think you're owed?

I woke up on the crazy side of the bed today, this isn't all directed at you but it's been typed and on my mind so whatever:
I struggle with the idea of 'coming out' because I just have a lot of general resentment about how the world is vs how it should be (which is just an exercise in madness because the world will never be how it "should be" in my lifetime/generation, or the next, or the next, etc).

Straight people just get to be. And I lean toward the idea that Dan/Phil also just want to be. They're making their man lust mentions, they gave up the heteronormativity, they're living their lives. AND I STRUGGLE WITH THE IDEA OF ANYBODY who isn’t straight being expected as a matter of course to one day just not 'be'. It’s partially due to audience-size obviously, but Chris is bisexual/openly into dudes and it’s fine. He’s just being. If D&P had continued how they started in 2009 being casually open with not being straight (labels and all), I wonder where we would all be now. And I’m annoyed that it’s even a thing. I’m annoyed that it’s not even just the straight people who can hear the things Dan (AND Phil more and more) says/has said and say it’s disrespectful to “””””ASSUME””””” anything about their sexualities as if not perceiving somebody as straight is a terrible thing. That a sexuality outside the 'norm' could be shameful and we all need to shhhh unless they want to put it out there themselves (because what they are putting out there just isn't enough - who even decides what's 'enough'?)

And what I’m saying is why do only straight people get to not put anything out there and just exist the way they like? I mean, I know why. But I resent it. I see both sides: coming out can be a great thing, a relief, being open with who you are etc. in your personal life with people who matter to you. Sure. But publicly there’s this shift, a marker separating who you were and who you are now: as an OUT person. Are people closeted, or are people just private. Why is an “uncomfirmed” sexuality (outside of 'confirmed' (coughordefaultedbcitsthenormcough) straight) assumed HIDDEN rather than… just existing independent of our business. I guess to one day get to the point where everybody can just be. But in terms of public figures, the idea that they are either out or hiding (with the subtext of shame hanging over everything) bothers me so much. I don't know if I'm allowed to be bothered by it though while still yearning for lgbt+ representation everywhere (and lgbt+ representation apparently not existing at all without having it explicitly said over and over, labels required, for the fucking idiots out there). Like I think D&P are already normalising and representing great things, but somehow it's not enough (or even offensive to some..) to think that unless they slap a label on their foreheads.

I’m not clamoring for them both to come out (because I don't think they're crammed in some kind of shame closet to begin with), I’m watching with a hawk eye because of what I think they’re doing, and I like it and am fascinated by it (if it’s even correct). I just need to say: I look at them and see that they’re obviously together. From that observation follows the deduction that neither of them are straight (also the fact they’ve both said it but whatever whatever, time erases the meaning of specific words is something I’ve learned). It’s an observation. It’s fine. That some people react to that with demands to respect them is another pebble on the mountain of things that wears me down as a human being (that doesn't really pop up around here, but I'm having a rant). And that some people can dismiss the validity of why others think they're together with an eyeroll (or whatever Shane's video is. even after a good sleep: still bothered by it). But I can’t control what other people think, and what I can’t control shouldn’t bother me. But what other people think affects the lives of others, it affects my life, so how can I not care.

Blah blah blah this was a waste of time sorry. Did I even have a point. I understand the importance of 'coming out' obviously, on a grand scale. Representation, normalization, ation ation ation. But on the smaller scale, of the real people expected to do it (in a public fashion, more specifically), it’s a tiring idea. They’re already who they are to the people in their real personal lives who matter. To feel like you have to wake up one day and BE THIS NOW forever and people want it from you (and the nagging why of it, just to confirm a 'ship' to better enjoy their own fantasies of your private life? to freely laugh over a dumb joke tweet without some niggling frustration? why?), the thought of it just tires me out. Especially when they're already being pretty clear and open in certain ways (at least about what doesn't get too close to their own privacy).

And the larger question with D&P, if they did at some point slap some labels on their foreheads, would have to be answered in the next breath. Right? 'Coming out' would only make the real elephant in the room even larger, and that's the elephant they actually want to ignore. It's simpler to leave all the elephants alone and just keep doing what they're doing. Orrrrr they're evil queerbaiters who would have to lack all humanity and moral decency. Super plausible. Excuse me while I retch.
tl;dr - yikes word vomit, run
Bravo to your post! I agree with everything you've said, and I just wanted to add something: What if they don't want to label themselves by coming out? Because once they come out, sooner or later, they won't be known as Dan and Phil anymore - they'll just be known as those two "gay" Youtubers. You know what I mean? And they've been trying so hard to leave their mark in this world as Dan and Phil. They want to be known as Dan and Phil, even when they disappear. They want people to remember them as what they want to be remembered. Even a passing person will remember them as Dan and Phil.

On the topic of Phil's vid, well... I actually emphatize with him, not on the gym part, but on the puking part because I literally threw up in my mouth and swallowed it back a few months ago. Also, Phil is luckier than me in this scenario because after swallowing it, I puked again. In a public vehicle. And I dropped myself off. Without paying. It felt horrible, so I fully empathize with Phil on that one. Also, it's pretty shitty because the world isn't spinning (technically, it does), but it feels like it does, and your puke smells disgusting which makes you want to puke more, and when you puke again, you just kind of realized that your puke smells more disgusting than before. That trainer should be fired, though. Not everyone has the same capacity as him smh.

Also... yay for Phil reaching 4 mil!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:46 pm
by Birdie
kuensukki, your post is on point!

I also really liked fancybum's post, especially the part under the spoiler. I think we should leave representation to fiction actually. I'm always happy when Youtubers feel comfortable enough to come out and share their experience with their viewers but I think it's wrong to demand it of Youtubers in the name of representation. These are real people and their safety and comfort matters more. If a lgbtq Youtuber isn't comfortable with sharing their sexuality online then that should be the end of the story. Dan even said he doesn't want a label but people are still prying into his private life, trying to force him to disclose his sexuality and that's just wrong. I wholeheartedly agree with you, fancybum, and I love how you worded it. Just let them be.

On another note, as someone who isn't convinced deppy are a couple and doesn't really care, I still think what Shane did was wrong and an immense invasion of privacy. His video won't have any impact, deppy will ignore it and it will be forgotten, but it was still wrong for most of the reasons fancybum has mentioned. I agree with kuensukki, I think Shane is genuinly bothered by their "queerbaiting" but the way he went about this is skeevy. He could have made a well-informed video about what queerbaiting even is. He could have started by admitting to his own queerbaiting not so long ago before he lashed out at others. But that's Shane for you. I'm not sure he even realises he's been doing it himself or that he's basically doing to deppy what other people have done to him whilst he was in the closet. There's not much more to add. I just hope this blows over fast.

Phil's video was great, by the way. I love this style of video and it was really funny even though what happened to him is horrible. I like how he manages to tell stories like this one without being too self-deprecating. It's something that happened and even though it was horrible he manages to make light of it. I hope he'll make more videos like this one in the future.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:17 pm
by lilMango
I'm so happy Phil finally has 4 million, but I'm sad he couldn't get there by his birthday. Normally it seems like bigger youtubers have their subscriber count speed up significantly when they're ~5k away from a milestone, but for Phil it was around ~2k... just me?
Anyway, I loved his video, I'm so glad he had a warning about the puke talk. He seemed so upbeat in a genuine way, which is exactly what I love to see from Phil. His little skits make me so happy as well, he really gets into the characters

As for the Shane thing: I think Shane is just blissfully ignorant. I've read a lot of arguments of people saying "he must be in on this more than he's letting on... aren't all youtubers in on this? and Shane loves gossip" but I have such a hard time believing that when the only proof he shows is this bland shit. You can tell he puts as little effort into researching his conspiracy theories as possible, and to me Shane has always seemed isolated from the rest of the Youtube community. He hasn't been good friends with anyone who's involved with a larger friend group other than Joey Graceffa. He said himself that he's known about this theory for years, but that still doesn't lead me to believe that's he's done any extensive research or seen any legitimate proof. His laziness is what convinces me, combined with the fact that he feels far enough removed from Dan and Phil to post a video like this.

I am in no way defending him, though. He's just an idiot.

(Great post as always fancybum)

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 3:32 pm
by flurry
fancybum I couldn't agree more with you - can I just say the whole post was wonderful from start to finish. It always frustrates me for exactly the reasons you mentioned, when the forum goes towards the whole queerbaiting/outing discussion and somehow making it that Dan and Phil owe their audience to come out or to declare their sexualities or label themselves - and if they do not, they're labelled as queerbaiting. I haven't personally seen any behaviour that would queerbait to be honest - most of what they do can be put down to friendship or sexual innuendoes which frankly are what makes a lot of comedy these days. So once again, thank you for saying what I thought but didn't put into words.

Shane video well for me, I feel people do these things to get attention regardless of whether or not they have a clickbaity title. If people watch these things in mass amounts they'll want to make more - simple as that. If the phandom boycotts such videos instead of contributing to the views, there's no incentive for him to make it. If no one responds then he's being ignored. The worst thing I feel is that people will bring it up in liveshows and honestly what's the point of that? The video is already out there and millions have probably already seen it.

Phil video I loved it! He seems to have adopted some of the Dan-esque storytelling style which I always like. Sadly I won't be re watching because it makes me queasy just thinking about it. Although I do feel really indignant at that personal trainer for dismissing Phil's concerns - like the sort of hellish PE teachers.

Regarding the chat on premium messages in liveshows some time back -- I meant to ask: roughly how much does it cost to send a premium message? Because I personally can't understand spending money to get a single question answered though each to their own of course. I think what I really don't get is how much the top fans have to spend to just have their username called out and allocated some prize verbally - I realise that the top fans are mostly the same in both live shows every week like wonderfully Rachel??

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:40 pm
by SexyTrashCan
Whoo Phil hit 4 mil! Am insanely happy for him especially since I didn't expect him to hit it today!

Also like Dan giving him a spon on twitter

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:53 pm
by zvezdochka
fancybum wrote:One recent tweet as evidence of them intentionally exploiting the ambiguousness of their relationship for profit?
Okay, how about writing and acting out fan fiction? That's literally a part of a show they were selling tickets for. Selling, sales, commercialism, moneyyys.
fancybum wrote:You need a reason for the ambiguity. Of their relationship or their sexualities?
Of their relationship. They both are openly queer to me, and I can live without PSA with rainbow coloured fireworks. But building a joint brand and cultivating a following has consequences. D&P are influencers, and the message they're putting out right now is "If you are in a gay relationship with your friend, hide it. If everyone thinks you are, but you aren't, don't tell the truth". Hush-hush. And while I understand why they want to hide their status if they are involved, I don't see why not come clean if they aren't. So either they are in a relationship and exploiting it (which is fine by me, they are free to do whatever they want with their feelings), either they are not in a relationship and exploiting the ambiguity (which I'm torn about, because it's misleading, but also evil D&P is my kink).

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:08 pm
by houseplant
hello, let me be THAT PERSON who suddenly appears out of nowhere to say 'hey i'm new, i'm so glad...' because yeah, hey, i'm new and i'm so glad i somehow stumbled here after googling dan and phil lube? or something idek the lack of sleep from going back through the threads like a crazed demon is getting to me

i've somehow managed to fall in love with dan and phil and phan in just two short months after vaguely knowing about them for years and going, like, nope, youtubers would just ruin my life and free time but look at me now: it's 1am and i just made an account here after saying i'd go to sleep four hours ago

and all i really wanted to say is that this has so far been an eye-opening, informative, thoughtful, hilarious and sometimes wtf experience and has helped solidify my opinion on deppy, so, like, thanks for being awesome (and being around my age haha)

so i'm gonna go and sleep so i can wake up, refreshed enough, to read the rules and go on with my catch-up...sorry for typing this way, by the way, i'm lazy and pretentious and very random laterssss

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:14 pm
by SexyTrashCan
houseplant wrote:hello, let me be THAT PERSON who suddenly appears out of nowhere to say 'hey i'm new, i'm so glad...' because yeah, hey, i'm new and i'm so glad i somehow stumbled here after googling dan and phil lube? or something idek the lack of sleep from going back through the threads like a crazed demon is getting to me

i've somehow managed to fall in love with dan and phil and phan in just two short months after vaguely knowing about them for years and going, like, nope, youtubers would just ruin my life and free time but look at me now: it's 1am and i just made an account here after saying i'd go to sleep four hours ago

and all i really wanted to say is that this has so far been an eye-opening, informative, thoughtful, hilarious and sometimes wtf experience and has helped solidify my opinion on deppy, so, like, thanks for being awesome (and being around my age haha)

so i'm gonna go and sleep so i can wake up, refreshed enough, to read the rules and go on with my catch-up...sorry for typing this way, by the way, i'm lazy and pretentious and very random laterssss
Hi and welcome. I feel like I can relate to you very well haha. My friends tried to get me into Dan and Phil since 2013 but I only fully got into them in early January and they've taken over

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:41 pm
by lilMango
houseplant wrote:hello, let me be THAT PERSON who suddenly appears out of nowhere to say 'hey i'm new, i'm so glad...' because yeah, hey, i'm new and i'm so glad i somehow stumbled here after googling dan and phil lube? or something idek the lack of sleep from going back through the threads like a crazed demon is getting to me

i've somehow managed to fall in love with dan and phil and phan in just two short months after vaguely knowing about them for years and going, like, nope, youtubers would just ruin my life and free time but look at me now: it's 1am and i just made an account here after saying i'd go to sleep four hours ago

and all i really wanted to say is that this has so far been an eye-opening, informative, thoughtful, hilarious and sometimes wtf experience and has helped solidify my opinion on deppy, so, like, thanks for being awesome (and being around my age haha)

so i'm gonna go and sleep so i can wake up, refreshed enough, to read the rules and go on with my catch-up...sorry for typing this way, by the way, i'm lazy and pretentious and very random laterssss
Welcome welcome!! I can relate to you so much, the night I found all of the old forums I spent HOURS becoming the demon that I am now haha

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:47 pm
by Birdie
zvezdochka wrote:
fancybum wrote:One recent tweet as evidence of them intentionally exploiting the ambiguousness of their relationship for profit?
Okay, how about writing and acting out fan fiction? That's literally a part of a show they were selling tickets for. Selling, sales, commercialism, moneyyys.
There's a difference between jokes and acting out fan fiction and alluding to being a couple though. Acting out shippy fanfiction is something loads of Youtubers do and everyone knows it means nothing, it's just funny. Dan's sexual jokes... whatever. Another thing loads of people do and being in a relationship is usually never the punchline, someone else thinking (the landlord, their neighbours etc.) they are is. I don't think this is in any way them alluding to being in a relationship. It's literally just harmless jokes, everyone on Youtube makes them.
zvezdochka wrote:Of their relationship. They both are openly queer to me, and I can live without PSA with rainbow coloured fireworks. But building a joint brand and cultivating a following has consequences. D&P are influencers, and the message they're putting out right now is "If you are in a gay relationship with your friend, hide it. If everyone thinks you are, but you aren't, don't tell the truth". Hush-hush. And while I understand why they want to hide their status if they are involved, I don't see why not come clean if they aren't. So either they are in a relationship and exploiting it (which is fine by me, they are free to do whatever they want with their feelings), either they are not in a relationship and exploiting the ambiguity (which I'm torn about, because it's misleading, but also evil D&P is my kink).
There is no message. This isn't fiction, it's someone's actual life. Deppy have every right to keep their sexualities and their hypothetical relationship a secret if they want to, they're not sending any messages by doing so. That's what I meant earlier. When it comes to real people we shouldn't really talk about representation and messages or whatever like this. For whatever reason Dan and Phil aren't comfortable with disclosing their sexualities and relationship status. And that's okay. I don't want representation from a real life person if talking about their sexuality online is making them uncomfortable. That's just going too far in my opinion.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:50 pm
by lishachi
houseplant wrote:hello, let me be THAT PERSON who suddenly appears out of nowhere to say 'hey i'm new, i'm so glad...' because yeah, hey, i'm new and i'm so glad i somehow stumbled here after googling dan and phil lube? or something idek the lack of sleep from going back through the threads like a crazed demon is getting to me

i've somehow managed to fall in love with dan and phil and phan in just two short months after vaguely knowing about them for years and going, like, nope, youtubers would just ruin my life and free time but look at me now: it's 1am and i just made an account here after saying i'd go to sleep four hours ago

and all i really wanted to say is that this has so far been an eye-opening, informative, thoughtful, hilarious and sometimes wtf experience and has helped solidify my opinion on deppy, so, like, thanks for being awesome (and being around my age haha)

so i'm gonna go and sleep so i can wake up, refreshed enough, to read the rules and go on with my catch-up...sorry for typing this way, by the way, i'm lazy and pretentious and very random laterssss
welcome! :thumb:

happy that phils at 4 mil! he deserves it. video was really funny too, loved his jumper, he's just a lovely human bean.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:03 pm
by /fɪl lɛstɚ/
This may or may not make me sound like an idiot, but does Phil send out an automatic message after every Younow?? Because I watched last week and I just noticed that this comment was posted on my YouNow page by him: "Thanks so much for coming to my show and being a top fan! *gives you a marshmallow planet lollipop*"

I was most certainly NOT a top fan because I've never spent any money on YouNow?? Did everyone else get a message like this too?
I'm probably such an idiot for being so ?? about this

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:05 pm
by lurker
fancybum, thank you for your post, i agree with what you said strongly.

zvezdochka, i'll just pick the following part out of your posts because i genuinely don't understand where you're coming from there:
zvezdochka wrote:[...]and the message they're putting out right now is "If you are in a gay relationship with your friend, hide it. If everyone thinks you are, but you aren't, don't tell the truth".
first of all, the sentiment that they are lying about their relationship doesn't sit well with me. you're talking about "right now" and there haven't been any recent declarations of relationship labels, so whatever it is, they cannot be lying about it currently. secondly -- this might be a language misunderstanding or nitpicking on my behalf, but the sentiment that a closeted person hiding their sexuality or relationship is "not telling the truth" sits even worse with me as it implies that they have a moral obligation to "come clean" with it, which they don't, period. these details aside -- i genuinely don't understand why you feel that their behaviour is sending such a specific message. or, if they're sending a message, why it's not simply "if you're in a relationship with someone you work with and that work includes sharing parts of your life with a huge audience you should consider whether you want to keep that relationship private or not". if dan and phil are a couple, they're surely not the only youtubers who decide to keep their relationship off-camera, so why should they especially have the obligation to send a different message to their audience?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:13 pm
by blackdenim
I know probably no one cares because I'm not very active here, but I just thought I'd put my 2 cents in on Shane.

It seemed like a very throwaway, surface level mention to me, I didn't see anything offensive or wrong with it, the stuff he showed is a quick Google away and on the tamest end of what you can find with a cursory search, too. No promo, no D&P in the thumbnail or tags.

I imagine if he hadn't mentioned them at all the comments would have been overwhelmed by people demanding he cover Phan next time - as many videos about Youtubers that don't mention D&P are. I felt like such a quick mention indicated he was just trying to avoid that.

Shane doesn't need views or subs from the Phandom, he doesn't need them to keep liking him or keep watching him the way that other YTers that clickbait them (coughMarcuscough) might. I agree that suggesting they are queerbaiting was perhaps a bit irresponsible, but... I'm torn. I imagine a lot of the YT community who don't think D&P are together probably do think they're queerbaiting. I go back and forth on whether or not they're together and in the times when I think they're not, I think they're queerbaiting too.

I am about Shane's age. We had our teen years in the middle of the emo explosion, when Gerard Way and Frank Iero were making out on stage ostensibly just for attention, and everyone was convinced Pete Wentz and Patrick Stump were together. So I see queerbaiting as quite normal and to be honest, not even that bad of a thing to do. I understand why it is and I know I have to change my thinking on that, but I can also imagine myself making an offhand comment to a friend about D&P 'doing it for attention' without realising the full connotations of what I'd said. In fact I think I probably have said stuff like that. And I can imagine Shane, as not the most PC person, probably doing the same - but unfortunately to 9 million people instead of one friend.

(Not excusing it, and ready to be shouted down for what I said to be honest! Just my thoughts!)

I don't think Dan will mention this in his LS (if he does it) because hasn't he said before that he looks/ed up to Shane and Shane was one of the people who made him want to start YT? So he might be disappointed or not want to criticise him.

Also on a slightly unrelated note, I was very active in the Fall Out Boy fandom in my teens/early 20s, and I recently went to visit some old fandom friends I've not seen for a few years. And I mentioned D&P and one of them went 'god, I hate those guys. I've never seen one of their videos but every time Pete tweets, loads of people reply telling him to follow Dan again' as a member of both fandoms I found it really funny! I can imagine how annoying it must be for Pete/people trying to get noticed by him on Twitter!

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 6:29 pm
by zvezdochka
Birdie wrote:Acting out shippy fanfiction is something loads of Youtubers do and everyone knows it means nothing, it's just funny. It's literally just harmless jokes, everyone on Youtube makes them.

Does everyone on youtube has a shared fandom with another youtuber, that ships them?
Birdie wrote:For whatever reason Dan and Phil aren't comfortable with disclosing their sexualities and relationship status. And that's okay. I don't want representation from a real life person if talking about their sexuality online is making them uncomfortable. That's just going too far in my opinion.
Once again, imo, they are out, so I don't understand why you're bringing up representation.
lurker wrote:the sentiment that a closeted person hiding their sexuality or relationship is "not telling the truth" sits even worse with me as it implies that they have a moral obligation to "come clean" with it, which they don't, period.
I never said that??? I said that if everyone thinks two people are in a relationship, but they aren't, they should tell, that they aren't (="come clean"), before joking about it and selling it as a part of their brand.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:04 pm
by lurker
zvezdochka my bad, i misunderstood the second part that i quoted, so the second sentence in my response is invalid and i'm sorry for that. i can't edit it anymore, unfortunately.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:16 pm
by zvezdochka
No worries, my English is broken, so there's fault on my part too

Before Dan starts his liveshow and the conversation moves to another topic, I'd like to thank everyone who posted their thoughts on the subject. I have quite a lot to process

Re: Dan & Phil Part 40: We like the cock

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:29 pm
by secretagentphan
Guys, Shane made a conspiracy video with the conspiracy that Lou Reed was murdered by Lady Gaga and seemed to take that more seriously than phan so idek where that boys mind is..

CONGRATS TO PHIL THOUGH HE DESERVES IT

Also queerbating is the wrong word to use for phan if they aren't together, but they definitely profited off of mystery. I can't say I blame them, IF they aren't together they tried to say it bluntly in 2012 and people (rightfully) didn't believe them so maybe they just gave up and got the most out of it. I believe relationship or not how they act now is the real them. I can't help but feel like they purposely are getting us to believe they're together lately with a few comments and stuff though but I know it's just my phan goggles. (Just to be clear I believe they're together but I'm just saying hypothetically if they're not which is also possible)