Page 22 of 39

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:36 pm
by karma_yeah
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
I agree, basic trolling by a 16 year old. I think it's a real stretch to say they (or anyone else) can "prove that Dan is a dick/phan". Whether or not someone is a "dick" is an opinion and in the eye of the beholder.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:38 pm
by bear
Lurktacularr wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
Lol. Will believe it when I see it.

Actually scratch that, I probably still won't believe it. Do we know what timezone they're in i.e. what 'tonight' means?
I'm pretty sure in about a hour, as a hour ago they said they would leak in two hours or less.
I don't know if I will believe it, I lurk on their blog a lot and they seem to know their stuff. But on the other hand how could they have got all of this info? Also, it depends if it's something that could easily be photoshopped. I'll believe it when I see it as well.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:38 pm
by spaceguitar
hollyphan wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
probably nothing, just the same kids trolling around like always... maybe the ones with the "wE HacKed DAn's YoutUBe"-prank or so

but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure its literally that same person. They actually have an account on here. You know, that person who stans Charlie for some reason?

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:40 pm
by SquishPhan
spaceguitar wrote:
hollyphan wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
probably nothing, just the same kids trolling around like always... maybe the ones with the "wE HacKed DAn's YoutUBe"-prank or so

but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure its literally that same person. They actually have an account on here. You know, that person who stans Charlie for some reason?
Can't say I'm surprised by this info. They just really seem to crave attention. :roll:

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:40 pm
by bear
spaceguitar wrote:
hollyphan wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
probably nothing, just the same kids trolling around like always... maybe the ones with the "wE HacKed DAn's YoutUBe"-prank or so

but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure its literally that same person. They actually have an account on here. You know, that person who stans Charlie for some reason?
He is the same person.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:40 pm
by hollyphan
spaceguitar wrote:
hollyphan wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
probably nothing, just the same kids trolling around like always... maybe the ones with the "wE HacKed DAn's YoutUBe"-prank or so

but we'll see.
I'm pretty sure its literally that same person. They actually have an account on here. You know, that person who stans Charlie for some reason?

it's that exact girl. she tweeted about "leaking info" and stuff. so yeah, not worth attention and time. and yes, she has an account here. (HI!)

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:42 pm
by spaceguitar
Thanks guys. Also apparently Tomska has sent some asks to that blog (basically saying he wants nothing to do with it). This is all so weird.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:42 pm
by bear
human wrote:
bear wrote:So apparently the blog postulatedphan is gonna leak some screenshots and private things proving that Dan is a dick/phan tonight.
Opinions?
Lol I can see the headlines now; "HUMAN BEING MAY NOT BE PERFECT; CHARACTER FLAWS FOUND".

I'll be in line to buy every copy (lol not).
I phrased it badly lol. They're just gonna say (I'm pretty sure) some bad things he done in his past, but we all have as well. I just know there is going to be a shitstorm whatever the truth is (if they're lying or not.)
P.S: I highly recommend lurking on the blog and reading all the pages.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:43 pm
by crash[]
The blog just updated and they just said this.

"2008 – Early 2009: Charlie Casey and Phil Lester were in a polyamorous relationship with 3 other men. (source: updatedphan and a friend of one of the other men involved)"

>source: updatedphan
I had a laugh, thanks. I do trust the updatedphan mod, but something about the name drop made me smile.

Just reading the post for the drama, tbh.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:44 pm
by bear
Pretty sure they just posted it.
http://postulatedphan.tumblr.com

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:44 pm
by karma_yeah
I think we need a "Please don't feed the trolls" sign.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:46 pm
by Artdefines06
spaceguitar wrote:Thanks guys. Also apparently Tomska has sent some asks to that blog (basically saying he wants nothing to do with it). This is all so weird.

LOL, Tomska is in glasgow (scotland) for a con or on his way home, he is certainly not stalking phan tumblrs. He is a very busy man.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:48 pm
by SquishPhan
I love how we are supposed to take all their 'sources' so seriously, like please gossip magazines always use that trick and people have stopped falling for that (well most people).

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:50 pm
by spaceguitar
Artdefines06 wrote:
spaceguitar wrote:Thanks guys. Also apparently Tomska has sent some asks to that blog (basically saying he wants nothing to do with it). This is all so weird.

LOL, Tomska is in glasgow (scotland) for a con or on his way home, he is certainly not stalking phan tumblrs. He is a very busy man.
I really don't want to give the blog too much attention, but if you lurk there are public asks from him.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:52 pm
by corn flakes
lol can't care to give attention to someone that craves that

not posted in the main page lately because I can't keep up with : didn't watch the ls lately because of life but I'm unhappy about the loss of the radio show,it was something that as a fan even if they weren't uploading I knew was there.When it is that awards they were nominated for?

The snake game was boring and as much as i love dvsp I can't see how it can become something good.

pewdipie: seemed more of a roast towards the phandom and it's constant shipping, nothing against deppy or a possible relationship. At the end pretty good as he didn't shade them as a person but a part of their audience, like with pj were he was pretty soft as he is one of his friends.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:52 pm
by bear
spaceguitar wrote:
Artdefines06 wrote:
spaceguitar wrote:Thanks guys. Also apparently Tomska has sent some asks to that blog (basically saying he wants nothing to do with it). This is all so weird.

LOL, Tomska is in glasgow (scotland) for a con or on his way home, he is certainly not stalking phan tumblrs. He is a very busy man.
I really don't want to give the blog too much attention, but if you lurk there are public asks from him.
(Page 4)

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:53 pm
by Lurktacularr
Well, I'm gonna say the same thing I said when the 'shit storm' which turned out to be the TATINOF pre-trailer dropped: that was boring.

As you were.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:53 pm
by anime_is_not_cool
Really enjoyed that liveshow, i don't know why but ~hour after it I was mindlessly browsing the internet and oh.. I'm feeling very happy.. something good happened, what was it... oh yes PHIL
Loads of you were saying the same after last weeks show but imo it was just boring. Maybe cause today he seemed really excited and actually into it all. Tatinof ytred hype boiling inside him I guess.
kuensukki wrote:Also Phil describing all the string of emails they sent to ensure the trailer was perfect makes me think this is what Dan is so stressed about. Phil seems to be more excited and proud of everything he creates while Dan is nervous and scared of the perception. Maybe why Phil is so chill and growing shrimp babies while Dan is acting nervous AF :lol:
This

Lol at the "our friends and family" and changing to "my" when he mentioned it again. I'm not a native English speaker, so "our family" sounded kinda weird, but I suppose it can be used just as another word for relatives, not Phils-family-thats-also-Dans-family. (or maybe they are actually brothers )

Gotta go educate myself with those totally real new facts :D Tbh I kinda want it all to be real cause tea is the best tea.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:55 pm
by lilMango
The sources are definitely questionable, but to be honest this doesn't add much to the discussion anyway if we don't have any specific details. Broad events outlined like this are just to start drama, otherwise they would be more intricate and pose questions, etc.
I just find it funny that these people "aren't trying to start drama" and then post things like this to "expose" people without giving any detail that would actually prove anything.
Don't feed the trolls, guys. It ultimately only hurts them

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:56 pm
by bear
Apparently they posted their sources so take a look at them and decide for yourself.
Anyways, the liveshow today was really cute.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:01 pm
by karma_yeah
bear wrote:Apparently they posted their sources so take a look at them and decide for yourself.
Anyways, the liveshow today was really cute.
Gotta hand it to you bear. You're really trying. But looks like most people here know it's trolling and don't want to feed it.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:02 pm
by melon lord
I took screenshots of the post in case nobody wants to actually visit the blog
Image

Image

Image

Image
Sorry if I repeated a screenshot or it's out of order, it was in a hurry

I need to reread a couple of times to make any opinion on it so take of it what you will

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:03 pm
by Lain
SquishPhan wrote:I love how we are supposed to take all their 'sources' so seriously, like please gossip magazines always use that trick and people have stopped falling for that (well most people).
"(source: friend that was in year at school)"

"(source: updatedphan and a friend of one of the other men involved)"

:roll:
karma_yeah wrote:I think we need a "Please don't feed the trolls" sign.
I'm a sad panda every time I see someone respond to a troll on IDB. Starve them, yo.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:05 pm
by fakelights
That was a good laugh. Loving the first source "person who is friends with phil’s old uni teacher". Amazing!

Anyway, the liveshow was as cute as always. Loved the t-shirt and that he seemed really excited about what's to come, it made me excited as well :thumb: Now I'm curious about the trailers on wednesday.

Re: Dan & Phil part 25: 15% depth, 75% bants

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:06 pm
by bear
karma_yeah wrote:
bear wrote:Apparently they posted their sources so take a look at them and decide for yourself.
Anyways, the liveshow today was really cute.
Gotta hand it to you bear. You're really trying. But looks like most people here know it's trolling and don't want to feed it.
I never said it wasn't trolling. It most likely is. I'm just saying it in a unopinionated way. :)