I know the issue of creep shots has been discussed before (many times) but hope you don't mind my two pence worth on the subject. Imo we can only police our own actions to ensure that we abide by our own moral code. This dad probably thought he was being polite by not disturbing them, he may have reasoned that he would have preferred that if he were in their place. Also I believe it was the daughter that shared them not him? He was just doing something nice for his child by taking a few snaps of these grown men who make their living by selling their own likeness and likability.
As we know being a fan is by it's very nature invasive, this whole forum is dedicated to – respectful for the most part – chat and speculation about them, which I love by the way... I have never engaged in such classics as 'the zoom in on grainy pictures of the outside of their hotel room, which shows a vague impression of a bed', nah huh, not me (yes me) I'm innocent your honour; but as we all know other people can think we are a 'creepy bunch'. However I think these dad shots are very different from pictues taken by someone whose stalked them specifically to try and get a certain type of shot/proof.
Anyway, sorry to prattle on, I didn't really mean to go on about this specific set of pics, more the fact that youtubers in general are very casual about taking pictures of other non consenting members of the public in the course of vlogging etc, and think nothing of it, but they and often their fans don't like it the other way around. (I may be weird but I would hate to find myself around people who were vlogging). Do they even need for us to be over protective about being the subject of a candid picture? Personally I don't think so.
Also, let us not forget our boy Daniel is not averse to taking the odd candid celebrity shot himself, Psy in the lift anyone (failed admittedly)?
