- Moderator Action :
- Hey everyone,
Regarding the discussion of Dan's brother: Talking/theorizing about him is fine, so long as you don't reveal any of his person information (such as his location) and don't link directly to any of his social media accounts. (In accordance with Forum Rule 2). In light of this I have edited some of the previous posts to remove certain pieces of info. Feel free to carry on the discussion though, as long as it doesn't get too personal. Thanks!
Dan & Phil Part 2: lol bye gg
- oqua
- nose pervert

- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:05 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: California, USA
busy being happy~
-
fancy_nancy
- phabergé
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:44 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: Mexico
yupitsme wrote:lilMango wrote:haha yeah, I suppose I just mean that I wish they felt more open, like Phil's family, but I guess I'm asking for too much. It just seemed to be that the problem earlier was that Adrian was too young to be that open on the internet.majitzu wrote:Now that he is older... I'm older and I don't have my fb profile open. Is for privacy.lilMango wrote:This is a little off-topic, as my posts are usually.
It would be so cool if the three of them did a video. Blegh, now I'm just daydreaming. Poor Adrian.
- bluebox-away
- woodland creature
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:28 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: London, England
Hmm so I just looked up this profile and if it's legit, which it does look, then Dan's brother goes to the same school as my cousin?lilMango wrote:This is a little off-topic, as my posts are usually.
06/04/2016 - I found The Weakest Link

Gif credit: IckleMissMayhem
fancy_nancy wrote:yupitsme wrote:lilMango wrote:haha yeah, I suppose I just mean that I wish they felt more open, like Phil's family, but I guess I'm asking for too much. It just seemed to be that the problem earlier was that Adrian was too young to be that open on the internet.majitzu wrote:Now that he is older... I'm older and I don't have my fb profile open. Is for privacy.lilMango wrote:This is a little off-topic, as my posts are usually.
It would be so cool if the three of them did a video. Blegh, now I'm just daydreaming. Poor Adrian.
-
christyimnotred
- tol bean
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:01 pm
I don't know. I'm pretty old, I've been married for 23 years and I know a lot of couples. And I only know 1 that has the closeness that have. Most couples I know like each other fine but aren't best friends, inseparable, always want to be together. I think it is very rare to find a relationship like that and I hope they know how special what they have is. I've never had anyone in my life I could have 5 hour Skype conversations with, not even my sister who is the closest person to me. Even when they are at parties they are side by side. What in the world do they find to talk about all the time? Don't they get tired of each other? When my husband and I go to a party, I ditch him as soon as possible. We spend enough time together, let me talk to someone else!mermaid blood wrote:sometimes I'm a bit surprised to see the comments on phan - not over their bond, of course, which i agree comes across closer to obsessive best friends with giddy sexual chemistry than the typical long-term couple vibe. but moreso the time thing. it might just be my age? (late 20s) - but i personally know 2 couples who have been together 6-8 years and still spend every day together, have a healthy sex life (tmi) and adore one another (one gay, one het); and my sister and brother-in-law have a similarly close marriage and have been together since they were 16 (are now 35).
6 years...in the scheme of things really isn't that long. nor is their closeness or compatibility hugely uncommon. i think what is more uncommon about them is the health of their bond in the face of some heavy shit. being in the public eye and the subject of an obsessive fanbase, not anonymous joes with regular jobs, and closeted to boot. also a seemingly small support group. that is impressive, to me. to weather storms magnified 10 fold by their circumstances, and still be on one another's side.
totally agree with this theory that Phil flirts or is inappropriate overtly sometimes to overcompensate nerves, both with Dan and with others. alittledizzy what you said about Phil being worried he wouldn't be appealing out of his 5 minute snippets is perfect. people overlook that when thinking about them starting out.
The stream of consciousness pages of TABINOF were some of my favorite pages. I quite enjoyed the random run-on thoughts. And it really does show how some of the strange associations phil has in his head.starlight-still wrote:I was listening to that stream of consciousness thing from TAABINOF last night and can I just say that it contributed to my growing appreciation for him.ayane wrote:dan the man with the plan
Well, that and it got the onion guy from parappa song stuck in my head.
-
coffee pig
- woodland creature
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:37 pm
- Pronouns: ''ugh, her again''
- Location: London
haha yeah, I suppose I just mean that I wish they felt more open, like Phil's family, but I guess I'm asking for too much. It just seemed to be that the problem earlier was that Adrian was too young to be that open on the internet.
It would be so cool if the three of them did a video. Blegh, now I'm just daydreaming. Poor Adrian.
{ bisexual Philophile and respectful stalker since 2008 }
Have to agree with you - I met my husband when I was 19 & we've been married for 25 years, and even when we were in newly together, although we loved each other's company, we were never inseparable like D & P seem to be. We worked together for quite a while, and once the work day was done, we needed some time alone with our respective friends...I think people often get worried that they'll "lose themselves" if they almost exclusively engage only with each other. I'd say very few couples that I know, who've lasted long term, have been that wrapped around each other. I've known couples that were always by one another's sides, but I have to say that the relationship rarely lasted long. OTOH, it may well be that D&P DID want to lose themselves in each other, due to the nature of their work, or other situations in their life. So, I'd have to agree that what D&P have together seems to be a very uncommon (and beautiful!) bond with each other, regardless of the relationship's nature. (knock wood)christyimnotred wrote:mermaid blood wrote:sometimes I'm a bit surprised to see the comments on phan - not over their bond, of course, which i agree comes across closer to obsessive best friends with giddy sexual chemistry than the typical long-term couple vibe. but moreso the time thing. it might just be my age? (late 20s) - but i personally know 2 couples who have been together 6-8 years and still spend every day together, have a healthy sex life (tmi) and adore one another (one gay, one het); and my sister and brother-in-law have a similarly close marriage and have been together since they were 16 (are now 35).
I don't know. I'm pretty old, I've been married for 23 years and I know a lot of couples. And I only know 1 that has the closeness that have. Most couples I know like each other fine but aren't best friends, inseparable, always want to be together. I think it is very rare to find a relationship like that and I hope they know how special what they have is. I've never had anyone in my life I could have 5 hour Skype conversations with, not even my sister who is the closest person to me. Even when they are at parties they are side by side. What in the world do they find to talk about all the time? Don't they get tired of each other? When my husband and I go to a party, I ditch him as soon as possible. We spend enough time together, let me talk to someone else!
"If you have an exit strategy it's not an obsession." - Mark Cuban
-
corn flakes
- moon room
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:26 am
I personally know other couples that have been togheter since they were 16 but I'm still amazed by Deppy: they met when they were young but at what would have to be different stages in their life (Dan going to University and to discover life and Phil , someone that has already graduated and now is going to work but should in theory have more experience), they spend everyday togheter and have gone through so much shit under the public eye , (the stalking behaviour of people,the judgment from other people, things that we don't know ) that for me this 6 years are much more. They may have their problems and there will be sometimes where they can't stand each other but they have that kind of bond (platonic or non)that unfortunatly many of us will only know in books and films.christyimnotred wrote:I don't know. I'm pretty old, I've been married for 23 years and I know a lot of couples. And I only know 1 that has the closeness that have. Most couples I know like each other fine but aren't best friends, inseparable, always want to be together. I think it is very rare to find a relationship like that and I hope they know how special what they have is. I've never had anyone in my life I could have 5 hour Skype conversations with, not even my sister who is the closest person to me. Even when they are at parties they are side by side. What in the world do they find to talk about all the time? Don't they get tired of each other? When my husband and I go to a party, I ditch him as soon as possible. We spend enough time together, let me talk to someone else!mermaid blood wrote:sometimes I'm a bit surprised to see the comments on phan - not over their bond, of course, which i agree comes across closer to obsessive best friends with giddy sexual chemistry than the typical long-term couple vibe. but moreso the time thing. it might just be my age? (late 20s) - but i personally know 2 couples who have been together 6-8 years and still spend every day together, have a healthy sex life (tmi) and adore one another (one gay, one het); and my sister and brother-in-law have a similarly close marriage and have been together since they were 16 (are now 35).
6 years...in the scheme of things really isn't that long. nor is their closeness or compatibility hugely uncommon. i think what is more uncommon about them is the health of their bond in the face of some heavy shit. being in the public eye and the subject of an obsessive fanbase, not anonymous joes with regular jobs, and closeted to boot. also a seemingly small support group. that is impressive, to me. to weather storms magnified 10 fold by their circumstances, and still be on one another's side.
totally agree with this theory that Phil flirts or is inappropriate overtly sometimes to overcompensate nerves, both with Dan and with others. alittledizzy what you said about Phil being worried he wouldn't be appealing out of his 5 minute snippets is perfect. people overlook that when thinking about them starting out.
I tried to find a quote to specify that but I have found this one that's super soppy:
Lily:Whats a soulmate?
Dawson: It's a.. Well, it's like a best friend, but more. It's the one person in the world that knows you better than anyone else. It's someone who makes you a better person, well, actually they don't make you a better person... you do that yourself-- because they inspire you. A soulmate is someone who you carry with you forever. It's the one person who knew you, and accepted you, and believed in you before anyone else did or when no one else would. And no matter what happens.. you'll always love them.
- Dawsons creek
English is not my first language: half of the mistakes are typos ,half are me
offtopic:
aahhh omg! I was only a lurker at GG and I was SO pissed about what happened there in the threads! Now I'm finally here after a few days of work and uni and have more than 70 pages to catch up to. AWESOME! I don't know you, but I kind of missed you all.
Keep postin', I'll start from the beginning now... xD
Greetings from lovely Berlin
aahhh omg! I was only a lurker at GG and I was SO pissed about what happened there in the threads! Now I'm finally here after a few days of work and uni and have more than 70 pages to catch up to. AWESOME! I don't know you, but I kind of missed you all.
Keep postin', I'll start from the beginning now... xD
Greetings from lovely Berlin
Phandom got me like..
bluebox-away wrote:Hmm so I just looked up this profile and if it's legit, which it does look, then Dan's brother goes to the same school as my cousin?lilMango wrote:This is a little off-topic, as my posts are usually.
If you’re attracted to somebody, you’ll want them to sniff you eventually - Dan
*Phil is turned on by Dan's brilliance* *they kiss* *they have sex in the microwave* - Oqua (actually Phil)
*Phil is turned on by Dan's brilliance* *they kiss* *they have sex in the microwave* - Oqua (actually Phil)
- bluebox-away
- woodland creature
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:28 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
- Location: London, England
That's not a weird thing to ask at alldaphenaxa wrote:bluebox-away wrote:Hmm so I just looked up this profile and if it's legit, which it does look, then Dan's brother goes to the same school as my cousin?lilMango wrote:This is a little off-topic, as my posts are usually.
06/04/2016 - I found The Weakest Link

Gif credit: IckleMissMayhem
-
Cora
- eclipse shirt
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 1:36 am
- Pronouns: She/Her/Ugh
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Aurdie wrote:Have to agree with you - I met my husband when I was 19 & we've been married for 25 years, and even when we were in newly together, although we loved each other's company, we were never inseparable like D & P seem to be. We worked together for quite a while, and once the work day was done, we needed some time alone with our respective friends...I think people often get worried that they'll "lose themselves" if they almost exclusively engage only with each other. I'd say very few couples that I know, who've lasted long term, have been that wrapped around each other. I've known couples that were always by one another's sides, but I have to say that the relationship rarely lasted long. OTOH, it may well be that D&P DID want to lose themselves in each other, due to the nature of their work, or other situations in their life. So, I'd have to agree that what D&P have together seems to be a very uncommon (and beautiful!) bond with each other, regardless of the relationship's nature. (knock wood)christyimnotred wrote:mermaid blood wrote:sometimes I'm a bit surprised to see the comments on phan - not over their bond, of course, which i agree comes across closer to obsessive best friends with giddy sexual chemistry than the typical long-term couple vibe. but moreso the time thing. it might just be my age? (late 20s) - but i personally know 2 couples who have been together 6-8 years and still spend every day together, have a healthy sex life (tmi) and adore one another (one gay, one het); and my sister and brother-in-law have a similarly close marriage and have been together since they were 16 (are now 35).
I don't know. I'm pretty old, I've been married for 23 years and I know a lot of couples. And I only know 1 that has the closeness that have. Most couples I know like each other fine but aren't best friends, inseparable, always want to be together. I think it is very rare to find a relationship like that and I hope they know how special what they have is. I've never had anyone in my life I could have 5 hour Skype conversations with, not even my sister who is the closest person to me. Even when they are at parties they are side by side. What in the world do they find to talk about all the time? Don't they get tired of each other? When my husband and I go to a party, I ditch him as soon as possible. We spend enough time together, let me talk to someone else!

- spaceguitar
- ar·tic·u·late
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:22 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
I kind of side- eye the people who (intensely) romanticize the codependent aspect of D+P's relationship.
For me, I totally understand the spending-lots-of-time-together type of relationship. I'm an introvert and enjoy spending time with the same people. When my sister is home, I'll hang out with her every day. (Though we go out and do things).
For me, I totally understand the spending-lots-of-time-together type of relationship. I'm an introvert and enjoy spending time with the same people. When my sister is home, I'll hang out with her every day. (Though we go out and do things).
- alittledizzy
- actual demon phannie

- Posts: 7106
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:09 pm
- Pronouns: she/her
I think there's interesting potential in discussing what is romanticizing, and what is recognizing that Dan and Phil are comfortable/functional within the co-dependency and taking cues from them as to how to view it.spaceguitar wrote:I kind of side- eye the people who (intensely) romanticize the codependent aspect of D+P's relationship.
For me, I totally understand the spending-lots-of-time-together type of relationship. I'm an introvert and enjoy spending time with the same people. When my sister is home, I'll hang out with her every day. (Though we go out and do things).
It's also one of those issues where it's easy to project our individual habits and behaviors onto them. It's most telling to me that neither Dan nor Phil seem to have ever been like this with anyone else, that we know of. (And in Dan's case, if he was that co-dependent with his last girlfriend then it was within the context of a teenage relationship where no adult, life-altering decisions were being based on the dependency.)
Sorry about that, I wasn't sure exactly how precise the location was, seeing as I don't live in the UK. Didn't mean to cause any troubleoqua wrote:
- Moderator Action :
- Hey everyone,
Regarding the discussion of Dan's brother: Talking/theorizing about him is fine, so long as you don't reveal any of his person information (such as his location) and don't link directly to any of his social media accounts. (In accordance with Forum Rule 2). In light of this I have edited some of the previous posts to remove certain pieces of info. Feel free to carry on the discussion though, as long as it doesn't get too personal. Thanks!
Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."
"Make no judgements where you have no compassion." -Anne McCaffrey
-
corn flakes
- moon room
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:26 am
Maybe I don't understand the definition of codependt but for me they are able to work now without the other, they simply can't be bothered to because they have much more fun when they are togheter and are each other security blanket, in the sense that when there's a problem or an awakard situation they would help each other out. I may have throught that there were something when Dan admited to feel bad that weekend he was away with the bbc and he wasn't able to function...but was it because there was no Phil or there wasn't someone that made him feel at ease? For what I understood at least at the time Dan was insicure and shy. a deadly combination.spaceguitar wrote:I kind of side- eye the people who (intensely) romanticize the codependent aspect of D+P's relationship.
For me, I totally understand the spending-lots-of-time-together type of relationship. I'm an introvert and enjoy spending time with the same people. When my sister is home, I'll hang out with her every day. (Though we go out and do things).
What I admire it's how they never get tired of each other and when necesarry help each other but yes if there was something much more serious...
English is not my first language: half of the mistakes are typos ,half are me
-
karma_yeah
- philussy
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:24 am
- Location: Houston, TX, USA
hollyphan wrote:offtopic:
aahhh omg! I was only a lurker at GG and I was SO pissed about what happened there in the threads! Now I'm finally here after a few days of work and uni and have more than 70 pages to catch up to. AWESOME! I don't know you, but I kind of missed you all.
Keep postin', I'll start from the beginning now... xD
Greetings from lovely Berlin
I know what you guys mean about the co-dependence -- it probably is. And other than to say their relationship seems healthy and functional, it's kinda hard to deny it's true. Especially when Dan was away recently and Phil did "Another Sleepless Night"
Of course, the phandom went nuts with "Don't ever leave Phil again! He can't take care of himself." because he resorts to the equivalent of watching home videos of Dil (their "child") and hurts himself in the bathroom (ok, I admit I did laugh --- but because it was endearing)
I don't mean to over romanticize their co-dependence -- of course 24/29 year old men need to be able to function independently. But that's just it, I think they can function independently. They are smart, funny and creative. But if you can also do what you love with someone you love, why not? I have no doubt that they feel perfectly comfortable going in another room and playing a video game if they need time alone, or being in the same room together not saying a word for hours. A lot of the "OMG he's gone, I'm lost" stuff may be fan-service.
A couple of people mentioned they knew of a couple or two here or there like that. My in-laws were each others only loves and were married 58 years. After retirement several years back they were quite content to be with each other pretty much all the time. They weren't clingy, just comfortable. (my mother in law passed recently)
I'll admit to having a little bit of envy about their relationship.
What goes around, comes around 

This was the satsuma incident at big weekend 2014 i think when Phil went away (to florida?). In a liveshow Dan said how he was standing awkwardly in a circle while Nick Grimshaw was speaking to Harry Styles.corn flakes wrote: Maybe I don't understand the definition of codependt but for me they are able to work now without the other, they simply can't be bothered to because they have much more fun when they are togheter and are each other security blanket, in the sense that when there's a problem or an awakard situation they would help each other out. I may have throught that there were something when Dan admited to feel bad that weekend he was away with the bbc and he wasn't able to function...but was it because there was no Phil or there wasn't someone that made him feel at ease? For what I understood at least at the time Dan was insicure and shy. a deadly combination.
-
pearshaped34
- morning quiff
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:42 am
I think the story of how Dan and Phil meet doesn't bother me because it worked out so well (not that either of them knew they'd be living together six years later at the time it was playing out).Diyes_Celine wrote:Maybe it's my conservative upbringing but it really bothers me that Dan went to Manchester several times just for Phil. What did his parents say? Alone for days in a strangers house? Really?! If I didn't find their relationship endearing I'll just think that it was a college student who took advantage of his high school student stalker. I really think their questionable beginnings is a factor why they can't easily come out as a couple
If I was hearing the story and Dan had visited a few times and then they'd never mentioned each other again it would probably seem a lot more seedy to me.
But I don't really look at Dan as being a highschool student, if he hadn't taken a gap year he'd have been in uni himself at the time that they meet.
Regarding Dan's parents opinions though I'd be very surprised if Dan who let his parents find out he was a youtuber from somebody else actually told his parents he was going to stay with some 22 year old guy he'd been chatting to on the internet.
My personal theory is that alternate version of how they meet they were trying to sell for a period of time is the parent version of the story.
Dan probably just told them he was going to visit a friend who was at Manchester Uni (if he didn't have one then likely a random friend who wasn't close enough for his parents to know what they were up to but who's name they'd recognize). And then sometime after he got back he introduced the idea of Phil who he meet while there and then eventually the "friend" would be written out of the story and he'd just be going to see Phil.
And when you take the meeting on the internet thing out of the equation I don't think the age difference would have seemed like such a big deal to his parents. Then again it entirely possible they didn't know Phil's age at first, it's not like he couldn't pass for being a few years younger and if Dan said he was a friend of a friend they might have just assumed they same age without asking.
Thought it was one hell of a coincidence(!) Cheers for that.mez29 wrote:IckleMissMayhem wrote:I don't know if it's been said already yet but by the time they met IRL, Dan (if he hadn't taken a gap year) would have been at uni.
re: the co-dependency/omg they can't cope without each other... pfft. Doubt very much that's the case. They can, even if they prefer not to... (Let's be honest, we've had plenty of evidence that Phil's just as clumsy when Dan's around - although the "not being able to sleep" part the one night between Dan leaving and him going up north - make of that whatever you like(!) Although controversial idea - no proof as to what time the vid was filmed. Yes, it looks dark outside the kitchen/bathroom windows, but it's dark by 5pm in January...
Seems I'm in a cynical mood tonight...
IckleMissMayhem's evil fic writing alter ego. :twisted:
-
sunday
- pumpkin spice pumpkin cookie
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:19 am
- Location: down under
I just read your post and then came across this on tumblr - I'm guessing this is what you're referring tocorn flakes wrote: Maybe I don't understand the definition of codependt but for me they are able to work now without the other, they simply can't be bothered to because they have much more fun when they are togheter and are each other security blanket, in the sense that when there's a problem or an awakard situation they would help each other out. I may have throught that there were something when Dan admited to feel bad that weekend he was away with the bbc and he wasn't able to function...but was it because there was no Phil or there wasn't someone that made him feel at ease? For what I understood at least at the time Dan was insicure and shy. a deadly combination.

I think they can socialise without one another but obviously when you're with someone you know so well you're going to feel more comfortable. I think they're both just a bit socially awkward. Dan did that whole gaming documentary by himself... I wish Phil had done a documentary too, I wonder why he didn't want to.







