I disagree with the idea that patreon is only for smaller creators (many larger creators who get demonetized due to their content niche use it), and I say this as someone who has been on patreon for 8 years, done work with patreon, and is a much smaller podcaster.
I work for a large media company that does a lot of podcasts and we still rely on a membership/pay what you can model despite having a 100 million endowment. It costs money to do media, to employ people. Offering people the option to pay more for content/access is a trusted business model in the media space and patreon works hard to make the website attractive to larger creators like them.
You don't have to pay for it if you don't want to. I don't think it's two steps back at all. If people don't value what they create/put out, then they won't pay. They're in one of the least profitable niches on youtube (in CRMs and they said only one video all year has been monetized).
The metrics matter, especially at the early stages of creating a podcast. It is in fact a numbers game. It's totally a thing they should celebrate especially as people claim they're not relevant anymore or their fans have outgrown them (for example, DAPG hit 3 million again 8 years after the first time they hit 3 mill). They're also beating out REALLY big very conservative podcasts in the US like Joe Rogan, and they should celebrate that. Joe Rogan is the number one podcast and they beat him, at least for a day.
They have to get those kinds of stats if they want to attract sponsors anyway, which is what they have to do if you don't want to rely on the patreon.
I don't know what to tell you except that media costs a lot of money to make. Their behind-the-scenes tour shows ONE of their cameras is
a $2K camera.