000dia000 wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:01 pm
What do you guys think of Damien's comment about enjoying something, while also acknowledging the problematic nature or history that this thing might have? Also, Dan's following comment on how he enjoys Kanye's music, while also being aware of how he is problematic as a person. While, I suppose this is a rational approach to life and how to enjoy things, remember,not everything is pure and untainted, there's usually a dark underbelly to absolutely anything, but I'm just surprised that nobody seemed to bring this up. Mostly due to people's recent comments on deppy sort of taking the quiet approach to whatever their youtube peers are doing, in this case pewdiepie. It felt like Dan's comment in particular was a bit dismissive, idk, or maybe he was right and that you should be allowed to draw a line between appreciation, while also being critical? What is everybody else's thoughts on this topic?
(hey guys; this is my first post on here! c:
i apologise in advance if anything i will go on to say is problematic as that was definitely not my intent)
- I agree with Dan here, but elaboration on this would sound kind of redundant ^^"
- Did Dan have to explicitly say something about the PewDiePie incident? People watch DAPG for entertainment, not to be educated; we don't need to hear his opinions on the matter, and I'm kind of glad we didn't.
I also wonder whether people would've thought his comment was dismissive if he'd said something about a person being problematic making it so others shouldn't enjoy them... (which is just as dismissive in the opposite way)
- Also, (i apologise; this is kind of irrelevant) people are sensitive to certain things due to experiences that not everyone can/will have, so if someone wasn't immediately disgusted by something that could be seen as offensive, it's not because they're a bad person. Not everyone's first reaction to things can be empathic; similarly, people who'll be emotionally impacted by the same statement will almost definitely have a visceral reaction to it above anything else/without acknowledging other aspects of it. This doesn't excuse anything either side has done, but instead of expressing distaste for the people we're opposed to, we should be helping them understand why certain perspectives of the situation are important here (AND why certain people think they way they do so that we can cater our arguments to them). No one will learn much from the situation otherwise (even when they may need to); instead, it'll just create more tension (this was stated from experience)
I saw Phil's comment as adding on to Dan's (emphasising that one should be able to enjoy whatever they'd like and as such focusing on the positive part; most things they say on the gaming channel are impromptu so you can't really look at them as individual statements or just look at superficial meanings) and also as a sarcastic way of criticising Dan's taste in music. It was banter; it could've had deeper meanings (humor/reference-wise, for example), but probably not the ones we're looking for
sorry about this i probably sounded super pretentious but really i don't even know whether this was relevant to the discussion and seeing as no one else i know has said any of this i'm probably wrong ^^"