Page 35 of 40

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:56 pm
by flarequake
Ribena is diluted quite a bit, but you can get fed up of the same thing and even diluted, unless they're buying the sugar-free version and enjoy the taste of artificial sweeteners, it's still sugary.

Also, Lucy Ghost on YouTube has a fun clip-compilation video of the guys feeding each other.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 6:18 pm
by 000dia000
You don't get sick of ribena, it's a way of life.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 6:46 pm
by lefthandedism
flarequake wrote:Ribena is diluted quite a bit, but you can get fed up of the same thing and even diluted, unless they're buying the sugar-free version and enjoy the taste of artificial sweeteners, it's still sugary.
I think someone noted before that at one point they said they drank sugar-free Ribena. You can see the bottles in their fridge in the Monster Pops video, but I'm not enough of an expert to tell whether they are sugar-free.

At 14:04 (who doesn't want to rewatch Monster Pops anyway):


As for always drinking the same thing without getting tired of it, I know lots of people who have drunk nothing but Coke (or Diet Coke) for decades

So I would guess they are drinking water to be healthier. Or who knows, maybe they couldn't agree on spon with Ribena and decided not to give them any more free spon.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:01 pm
by flarequake
LeftHandedism wrote:
flarequake wrote:Ribena is diluted quite a bit, but you can get fed up of the same thing and even diluted, unless they're buying the sugar-free version and enjoy the taste of artificial sweeteners, it's still sugary.
I think someone noted before that at one point they said they drank sugar-free Ribena. You can see the bottles in their fridge in the Monster Pops video, but I'm not enough of an expert to tell whether they are sugar-free.

At 14:04 (who doesn't want to rewatch Monster Pops anyway):


As for always drinking the same thing without getting tired of it, I know lots of people who have drunk nothing but Coke (or Diet Coke) for decades

So I would guess they are drinking water to be healthier. Or who knows, maybe they couldn't agree on spon with Ribena and decided not to give them any more free spon.
Ah, okay, I didn't remember that. It sounds a bit petty to not continue showing the stuff and saying the brand name, if they like the stuff I'd think they'll keep drinking it on camera if they want to Maybe plain water made more sense while they were taste testing, the combination of bitter-cartridge and Ribena might have been too much like Phil's toothpaste example.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:10 pm
by blu
ribena analyzing
Image
Image

this is the ribena seen in their fridge.

Image

this is sugar-free ribena.

they both have the blue strip on the bottom of the label, so I think we can assume they do drink sugar-free, as regular ribena does not have the strip.

Image

regular ribena

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:23 pm
by swofro
Thanks to this discussion, I am now craving for some ribena. I agree with flarequake, plain water is a better idea for tasting test

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:56 pm
by bantstrash
Sugar free ribena is the devils piss I can't believe they willingly drink it. Real sugar ribena is lovely although not great for you. Better to have that rarely than the sugar free one all the time though.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:57 pm
by eevee
On second viewing of the gif where Dan stood up in the younow it does look to me like at first it's his arm but then at the end we see some leg!
alittledizzy wrote:From Chris's liveshow today, at 35:35 he made a future Dan and Phil marriage joke:
"And it's gonna be such a fantastic future. Dan and Phil are gonna get married. We're all gonna have holograms. Oop- Um. I think there was some kind of something wrong there with the internet. I think it froze a little bit, sounds like I was saying something when I didn't.
DEAD
000dia000 wrote:(Sorry I was a bit harsh, I just thought that that there was large backlash from people about this. Sorry, no problem.)
all good :) :platonic:

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:10 pm
by SexyTrashCan
The over analysing on this site is amazing (I mean this positively :D)

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:22 pm
by flarequake
SexyTrashCan wrote:The over analysing on this site is amazing (I mean this positively :D)
I know, it's amazing how much we get out of their drinks and what trousers they may or may not be wearing

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:50 pm
by dontpanic
Their video's #18 trending.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:08 pm
by confusedpanda
dontpanic wrote:Their video's #18 trending.
Whoever wrote the caption for it wrote "counselor's cartridges" instead of "console cartridges".
Image

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:15 pm
by Ticia
*furiously coughing*

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:20 pm
by nephilimcat
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:26 pm
by realeyesrealize
SexyTrashCan wrote:The over analysing on this site is amazing (I mean this positively :D)
It's what we do best, after all. We aren't called "in-depth bants" for nothing

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:27 pm
by Philena
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:28 pm
by flarequake
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
Wait, what am I missing? He's done a load of Splatoon videos (maybe more, they were long, I stopped watching) I guess they liked the promo? Microsoft decided Phil's Xbox vs PS3 conundrum for him years ago by giving him an Xbox. I hadn't thought of it before PJ's tweet, but it seems a common thing.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:29 pm
by Ticia
Philena wrote:
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it
PJ got the Nintendo for free and was upfront about it. Dan and Phil...just made a random and strange video about the super amazing new cool Nintendo console. Looks a bit fishy to me.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:32 pm
by Philena
Ticia wrote:
Philena wrote:
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it
PJ got the Nintendo for free and was upfront about it. Dan and Phil...just made a random and strange video about the super amazing new cool Nintendo console. Looks a bit fishy to me.
Oh, I see. Yeah, I would assume they got it for free, but they don't need to add that disclaimer, do they? I would assume many yters got one.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:44 pm
by lost686girl
lots of youtubers get free stuff mailed to them...it's not sponsored content unless they are being paid for an ad. getting something for free is not payment. the difference is that some youtubers will let you know "hey i got this for free in the mail". zoella probably gets most of her products for free

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:49 pm
by uglyamerican
First off, the Nintendo game card tasting video was ridiculous, so of course I loved it. More this, less homo-equus horseshit.

WTF Dan, you've never seen E.T.? And Phil never realized this for how many years? These nutters need to review the entirety of the '80s movie catalog, instead of wasting time on trash TV like Buffy - lots of gems in there.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:53 pm
by flarequake
Ticia wrote:
Philena wrote:
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it
PJ got the Nintendo for free and was upfront about it. Dan and Phil...just made a random and strange video about the super amazing new cool Nintendo console. Looks a bit fishy to me.
Yeah, it would be nice if they'd be clear and upfront. I thought I'd missed a joke or another tweet, I understand how it works, but I still could rant about the ridiculous unfairness of such comfortable people being given so many things just to help sell more, my idealism feels sick so I tend not to dwell on it. I'm more sad we're gonna see the daft party game and unlikely any of Zelda, but it's pretty clear they're happier playing silly games and can bant about anything, so if they're happy

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:53 pm
by fancy_nancy
Several ytrs recieved one for free, I thought it was obvious when they showed it in their video, nothing "fishy" about it.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:53 pm
by dontpanic
Philena wrote:
Ticia wrote:
Philena wrote:
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it
PJ got the Nintendo for free and was upfront about it. Dan and Phil...just made a random and strange video about the super amazing new cool Nintendo console. Looks a bit fishy to me.
Oh, I see. Yeah, I would assume they got it for free, but they don't need to add that disclaimer, do they? I would assume many yters got one.
They did prob. got it for free, most youtubers with successful gaming channels did. I'm not sus about them not saying anything tho, only b/c they didn't even play a game, it's not like nitendo sent them the stuff to lick the cartridges. It would be more appropriate to disclose the free-ness of it all when they actually play something, but even then they wouldn't have to since it's not a spon.

plus, w/the low quality of the games I'm guessing they won't give raving reviews about it. I would only be :sideeye: if they only said great things about it AND then didn't say they were sent it for free.

Edit: whoops looks like a bunch of ppl said it much better than I

Re: Dan & Phil Part 39: There's no integrity here

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:00 pm
by uglyamerican
flarequake wrote:
Ticia wrote:
Philena wrote:
nephilimcat wrote:
Ticia wrote: *furiously coughing*
Well...
I don't get it
PJ got the Nintendo for free and was upfront about it. Dan and Phil...just made a random and strange video about the super amazing new cool Nintendo console. Looks a bit fishy to me.
Yeah, it would be nice if they'd be clear and upfront. I thought I'd missed a joke or another tweet, I understand how it works, but I still could rant about the ridiculous unfairness of such comfortable people being given so many things just to help sell more, my idealism feels sick so I tend not to dwell on it. I'm more sad we're gonna see the daft party game and unlikely any of Zelda, but it's pretty clear they're happier playing silly games and can bant about anything, so if they're happy
I play a lot of Battlefield 1, and watch the related gaming channels. A number of channel creators get gaming consoles and peripherals / gear from manufacturers to give away to their subscribers.... (maybe Nintendo should do the same...)