Page 39 of 41

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:12 pm
by Lurktacularr
yallneedtostop wrote:
Lurktacularr wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:
fancybum wrote:
alittledizzy wrote: It's the same voice Dan used when he said "Well done, Phil" in the liquid nitrogen meringue japhan instagram.
And the 'you living flop' during the pancake flipping, just a low affectionate mutter.


:roll:
You better unroll them eyes kid or you gon get wrekt

To anyone who seriously think Dan dgaf about Phil hurting himself (i.e. not many of you) he only smacked a suitcase jesus christ. He clearly wasn't hurt and I dare say he does shit like that hourly from what he tells us. How often would Dan have to take that kind of small bullshit seriously if he didn't laugh it off a bit??

LETS DO THE MATHS.

16 waking hours x 7 days a week x 52 weeks a year x 7 years = 40,768

Think my concern would have run out by now too.


Darling, idk who the hell you think you're talking to but I'm just going to assume you're young and not worry about it.


anyway.... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Jeez, did you give away your sense of humour with your dowry? :roll:

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:14 pm
by NarrysCanary
yallneedtostop wrote:

You think i got that kinda time!!!!!??????
Then again, if you don't have time, why are you here ?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:15 pm
by alittledizzy
missemma wrote:We are all here for people to express their opinions, some may differ from your own and that is okay. Just play nicely please. There is no need to post to try and antagonise others, this is not the place for that. Maybe familiarise yourself with the forum rules.
Quoting this since it ended up on the bottom of the last page, and it's exceedingly relevant to the current conversation.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:16 pm
by melon lord
What is even going on right now :lol:

[insert obligatory "omggggg if ur relly phil den post seekrit messg on tweetr so we see trooth!!1!11!!"]

Personally I don't think he was apathetic, more like unsurprised As a fellow klutz I know the exasperated sigh all too well

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:16 pm
by Lurktacularr
NarrysCanary wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:

You think i got that kinda time!!!!!??????
Then again, if you don't have time, why are you here ?
You just went from like 4 posts to 15 in about as many minutes - you got plenty of time

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:18 pm
by Amazinglyonfire
I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...

Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:19 pm
by yallneedtostop
missemma wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote: There's no issue. I just don't see how he apparently sounded fond. He couldn't care less that phil hurt himself lmao
I agree, I don't think he sounded fond either. To me he sounds done with the whole situation (not that it really matters mind you).

We are all here for people to express their opinions, some may differ from your own and that is okay. Just play nicely please. There is no need to post to try and antagonise others, this is not the place for that. Maybe familiarise yourself with the forum rules.

I am definitely a not 'antagonizing' anyone lol. it's not that serious. i'm just here eating my dominos having a little fun. Ya'll ever heard of it?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:20 pm
by yallneedtostop
Lurktacularr wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:
Lurktacularr wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:
fancybum wrote:
alittledizzy wrote: It's the same voice Dan used when he said "Well done, Phil" in the liquid nitrogen meringue japhan instagram.
And the 'you living flop' during the pancake flipping, just a low affectionate mutter.


:roll:
You better unroll them eyes kid or you gon get wrekt

To anyone who seriously think Dan dgaf about Phil hurting himself (i.e. not many of you) he only smacked a suitcase jesus christ. He clearly wasn't hurt and I dare say he does shit like that hourly from what he tells us. How often would Dan have to take that kind of small bullshit seriously if he didn't laugh it off a bit??

LETS DO THE MATHS.

16 waking hours x 7 days a week x 52 weeks a year x 7 years = 40,768

Think my concern would have run out by now too.


Darling, idk who the hell you think you're talking to but I'm just going to assume you're young and not worry about it.


anyway.... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Jeez, did you give away your sense of humour with your dowry? :roll:

DOWRY???? HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA



also :roll:

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:20 pm
by Galactic-Howell
OT: Guys, on the topic of Phil's mysterious IPhone convo that he showed in the LS, I think the thing that looks like a heart/angry emoji is just Charmander's tail.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by majitzu
I was excited when I saw 1 more page in the little moment i was out of the internet having lunch, you all have dissapointed me. :sideeye:

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by lurkizzle
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...

Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO
Agreed. He just bumped his hand, after all. I don't think I would've showed much concern either

And what do you mean about the timing?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by 000dia000
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...

Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO
Good point. I'm always suspicious when domestics is dropped. This felt like a 7/8 on the cute scale imo I wonder what damage control this is ?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by lilMango
W
Amazinglyonfire wrote:
Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO
Yeah, that's my question... why post it now? When did they actually film that video? Will we ever know the truth?

Edit: I'm laughing so hard... where is Jesp... senpai save us pls

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:22 pm
by yallneedtostop
Lurktacularr wrote:
NarrysCanary wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:

You think i got that kinda time!!!!!??????
Then again, if you don't have time, why are you here ?
You just went from like 4 posts to 15 in about as many minutes - you got plenty of time


It's because I'm a neglected London housewife and I'm just aching for an escape. which so happens to be a very intense phan speculation forum lol

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:23 pm
by Lurktacularr
yallneedtostop wrote:
lurktacularr wrote:
Jeez, did you give away your sense of humour with your dowry? :roll:

DOWRY???? HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA



also :roll:
Oh god it got cringey, fun's over :?

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:24 pm
by DryCereal
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...
Welcome to IDB. It's what we do best.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:25 pm
by yallneedtostop
Lurktacularr wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:
lurktacularr wrote:
Jeez, did you give away your sense of humour with your dowry? :roll:

DOWRY???? HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA



also :roll:
Oh god it got cringey, fun's over :?

so sorry there 'lurktacular' for making YOU cringe. I'll try to never do it again.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:26 pm
by Amazinglyonfire
000dia000 wrote: Good point. I'm always suspicious when domestics is dropped. This felt like a 7/8 on the cute scale imo I wonder what damage control this is ?
*taps nose*

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:27 pm
by SquishPhan
IckleMissMayhem wrote:
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...
Welcome to IDB. It's what we do best.
Yeah that is kind of what we do here.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:27 pm
by fancybum
yallneedtostop wrote:
missemma wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote: There's no issue. I just don't see how he apparently sounded fond. He couldn't care less that phil hurt himself lmao
I agree, I don't think he sounded fond either. To me he sounds done with the whole situation (not that it really matters mind you).

We are all here for people to express their opinions, some may differ from your own and that is okay. Just play nicely please. There is no need to post to try and antagonise others, this is not the place for that. Maybe familiarise yourself with the forum rules.
I am definitely a not 'antagonizing' anyone lol. it's not that serious. i'm just here eating my dominos having a little fun. Ya'll ever heard of it?
I'm just curious though, is your intent with every post just to show us all how irrational we are as 'shippers' (I'm under the impression you assume all 700+ members here are shippers)? Because coming into a new place rolling your eyes at everybody and what you project onto what they're saying doesn't really paint you in a better or more rational light, you know? 'It's not that serious' applies to the posts you came in swinging at. I'm not sure we all have the same definition of 'fun' but sure.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:28 pm
by confusedpanda
000dia000 wrote:
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...

Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO
Good point. I'm always suspicious when domestics is dropped. This felt like a 7/8 on the cute scale imo I wonder what damage control this is ?
Not even an hour before Onion boy put out that stupid rant video about Dan. It was completely damage control to me since everyone was talking about the drama. What a perfect distraction from the drama.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:28 pm
by yallneedtostop
fancybum wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:
missemma wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote: There's no issue. I just don't see how he apparently sounded fond. He couldn't care less that phil hurt himself lmao
I agree, I don't think he sounded fond either. To me he sounds done with the whole situation (not that it really matters mind you).

We are all here for people to express their opinions, some may differ from your own and that is okay. Just play nicely please. There is no need to post to try and antagonise others, this is not the place for that. Maybe familiarise yourself with the forum rules.
I am definitely a not 'antagonizing' anyone lol. it's not that serious. i'm just here eating my dominos having a little fun. Ya'll ever heard of it?
I'm just curious though, is your intent with every post just to show us all how irrational we are as 'shippers' (I'm under the impression you assume all 700+ members here are shippers)? Because coming into a new place rolling your eyes at everybody and what you project onto what they're saying doesn't really paint you in a better or more rational light, you know? 'It's not that serious' applies to the posts you came in swinging at. I'm not sure we all have the same definition of 'fun' but sure.
again..... it ain't that serious.

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:29 pm
by DryCereal
000dia000 wrote:
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...

Now ... the timing of the tweet/video is far more interesting than the actual video IMO
Good point. I'm always suspicious when domestics is dropped. This felt like a 7/8 on the cute scale imo I wonder what damage control this is ?
Image
dia, i'm SURE it had nothing whatsoever to do with R1 or he-who-is-a-total-Image


Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:29 pm
by majitzu
Amazinglyonfire wrote:I think there's far too much analysis of two phrases Dan uttered that don't amount to more than 3 seconds. I think it's just one of many incidents in their lives that doesn't amount to hill of beans...
hahhaha you know how the discussion works here, it can be super interesting or not meaningful at all... also i forgot to say this last time, Welcome back!!!


yes, yes it was an angry emoji face, mistery solved yesterday
Image

Re: Dan & Phil Part 24: I got moist for you, Phil

Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:29 pm
by Galactic-Howell
yallneedtostop wrote:
Lurktacularr wrote:
NarrysCanary wrote:
yallneedtostop wrote:

You think i got that kinda time!!!!!??????
Then again, if you don't have time, why are you here ?
You just went from like 4 posts to 15 in about as many minutes - you got plenty of time


It's because I'm a neglected London housewife and I'm just aching for an escape. which so happens to be a very intense phan speculation forum lol
If you don't have anything nice to say, please don't say anything at all.