
a close call with Capita£ester but as per usual, 'sexy things' (thanks phil) won out!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tiM0hJOONs
10.55






credit
AroboticPhil wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:29 am I loved this video so much and I'll definitely go back to it later today when I have more time but in the meantime I'm just gonna post this tweet :
Guys, really, it's fine, no need to tell us about your sex life in so much detail. Like, it's nice that you wanna share with the group and all, but there are some things I'd rather not have mental images of, thank you very much
OhItsElliott wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:21 amI've legitimately wondered about why Dan does this before and here you go putting all the puzzle pieces together!liola wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:52 am I'm pretty sure we've discovered Phil's kink. I wonder if that's why Dan likes to make himself smaller in videos![]()
the return of the whole macrophilia thing, this time from Phil, delighted me - so often it's dan talking about his kinks and phil either looking vaguely uncomfortable, or like he wants to chime in but can't. the over-lap with something that is so observable over the years (in their photoshopping, in body language, in compliments/comments) is just icing on the cake. dan clarified that it can mean a desire to be small OR be the large one, depending, and that felt very truthful to them. i can see examples of both interests for both of the guys; however dan's body insecurity and his implications that he enjoys submissiveness at least some of the time, cloud the subject in terms of what examples are true kink, and what are not.relatablemood wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:29 am
That's what I thought of, Dan genuinely seemed insecure for a moment there![]()
i like this point because it's the opposite of what i thought when i watched, and yet i agree it's a possibility, too. i read the situation as they were kind of more unsettled and filled with nervous (positive) energy than they were with tom and hazel because pj and sophie are such old friends, and the stakes are a little higher in terms of potential personal answers. they were a bit giddy to be filming with them, and we got much more uncensored playfulness out of them because of it. additionally we got more impulsively talkative dan, which can veer into overwhelming pretty quick, just something that happens to him when his energy is up. whereas the tom and hazel one felt more promo-y and coworker-y? i actually enjoyed this overall more than i thought i would. their collabs with pj can go either way, and are often imbued with a really strange awkward tension which isn't entirely unpleasant but you're left feeling like he's a guy who knows, and has seen, a lot of things when it comes to dan and phil. lol.pearshaped34 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:10 am if this behavior is actually worse when their with actual friends because with youtubers they don't know well they feel the need to at least try and be polite and focus on them but with friends they don't feel the need to make an effort and can just be natural selves and be all about each other.
yes i noticed that! i thought it was v sweet of phil to attempt to include sophie more, i think without phil doing that she would’ve been even less noticeable than her and peej already weremm_sunny1993 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:35 pm I liked how phil at least tried to involve sophie in the game more by addressing her and making her read questions out. That was a nice touch.
TINY PHIL KNELT IN THE BATHTUBthatone wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:46 pm
"dan did you secretly wrote the milk fic?"
D: tiny phil knelt in the bathtub[/i]
Ooh, interesting. So youtube took care of that real fast for them, but smaller creators are left dangling for days or weeks. Guess it's not surprising, since youtube itself stands to make more money off deps than smaller channels. Still sucks, though.mm_sunny1993 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:35 pm Just here to say that the video now has ad's on it so it seems like they got that fixed.
Dan's comparison between Phil and macrophilia, and himself and furry stuff on twitter was interesting - I can't interpret that any other way than Dan saying that both of them are just lowkey expressing out loud things they're into often enough that they understand we're gonna know they're at least kinda serious. Running jokes don't usually go on that long unless there's at least speculative interest there, if not an active pursuit of fulfillment with the internet.mermaid blood wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:41 pmthe return of the whole macrophilia thing, this time from Phil, delighted me - so often it's dan talking about his kinks and phil either looking vaguely uncomfortable, or like he wants to chime in but can't. the over-lap with something that is so observable over the years (in their photoshopping, in body language, in compliments/comments) is just icing on the cake. dan clarified that it can mean a desire to be small OR be the large one, depending, and that felt very truthful to them. i can see examples of both interests for both of the guys; however dan's body insecurity and his implications that he enjoys submissiveness at least some of the time, cloud the subject in terms of what examples are true kink, and what are not.
This video definitely felt more awkward to me than the first one, yet at the same time definitely more enjoyable. The awkwardness with Tom and Hazel was easy to write off as them just not knowing each other that well, which is a bit boring at the end of the day - but the awkwardness with PJ has a vibe of knowing each other too well, for sure. They are people who spend far, far more time with each other off camera than on and it shows that they're all similarly unsure of where boundaries are with each other. Generally it makes for a lackluster video, but the subject matter in this one melded well with that kind of nerves to be entertaining instead of painful to watch.mermaid blood wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:41 pmi like this point because it's the opposite of what i thought when i watched, and yet i agree it's a possibility, too. i read the situation as they were kind of more unsettled and filled with nervous (positive) energy than they were with tom and hazel because pj and sophie are such old friends, and the stakes are a little higher in terms of potential personal answers. they were a bit giddy to be filming with them, and we got much more uncensored playfulness out of them because of it. additionally we got more impulsively talkative dan, which can veer into overwhelming pretty quick, just something that happens to him when his energy is up. whereas the tom and hazel one felt more promo-y and coworker-y? i actually enjoyed this overall more than i thought i would. their collabs with pj can go either way, and are often imbued with a really strange awkward tension which isn't entirely unpleasant but you're left feeling like he's a guy who knows, and has seen, a lot of things when it comes to dan and phil. lol.pearshaped34 wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:10 am if this behavior is actually worse when their with actual friends because with youtubers they don't know well they feel the need to at least try and be polite and focus on them but with friends they don't feel the need to make an effort and can just be natural selves and be all about each other.
This post is gonna be massive so this is the last bit I'll quote of your post, merm, but: fuck yes. The sexual nature of the remarks between Phil and PJ totally threw me off, and I think they threw Dan and PJ (strangely, not Phil) off as well. That specific look that Dan gave Phil in response to 'hot PJ' (at twelve minutes in) is just fucking amazing. I want to know what was going through his mind.mermaid blood wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:41 pmon that point, did the whole thing feel kind of sexual tension-y to anyone else?! was not expecting that with sophie's inclusion, i thought if anything it'd be toned down with her there. pj and phil were kinda hitting on sophie at various points, pj was flirting with dan (what's new), pj was suggestive with phil, and phil with pj (this is brand new). i felt like i was watching the pre-cursor to a swingers evening, lmao.
I think he bought Geometry Dash, right? So I expect that either today or coming up soon.saffarinda wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:57 pmdo we have any hints/ideas about tonights vid? does anyone know what phil’s buying/playing on steam?
To me that was just the same thing Dan says every time he makes a 'big d' or 'gimme the p' comment. It's like his go to thing, 'never saying that again' along with 'this channel's gonna get demonetized' and other hyperbole. So the fact that it's just a standard Dan response when unsure of how else to react to saying something sexual about Phil kind of nullified any no homo in it.Secretstanner wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:36 pmSomeone pointed out dans comment saying “give me that p.. first and last time.” Wtf was that comment!? because I took that as a big no homo comment and it’s stuck in my head all night. It’s so stupid how a pointless comment can annoy you for no reason but it has.
I don't think the micro/macrophilia thing is likely an actual kink. My guess is that Phil stumbled across some one day and fell into a fascination hole saw more than he needed and now it pops into his head at inopportune moments. That's how his conversations about it reads to me, at leastblackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 pm re the furry/macrophilia stuff - do you guys think they're really 'trying to let us know' that those are their real kinks?
*snip*
But then on the other hand, the jokes have been going on a long time now and Dan, particularly, is so committed to the furry 'bit' that I'm unsure!
yeah, this last bit. most of the time when sometime says they're a furry, they're just saying they like furry porn. i imagine it would be the same with macro stuff. neither 'kink' is easy to make real in the bedroom, so i'd say they're telling us about their porn habits more than anything.Kimship wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:34 pmI don't think the micro/macrophilia thing is likely an actual kink. My guess is that Phil stumbled across some one day and fell into a fascination hole saw more than he needed and now it pops into his head at inopportune moments. That's how his conversations about it reads to me, at leastblackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 pm re the furry/macrophilia stuff - do you guys think they're really 'trying to let us know' that those are their real kinks?
*snip*
But then on the other hand, the jokes have been going on a long time now and Dan, particularly, is so committed to the furry 'bit' that I'm unsure!
Now, most furries don't consider actually being a furry a "kink", it's a bit deeper than that? It can be a kink, but isn't necessarily a kink. And I do think it plausible that Dan might have some furry tendencies, but it might also just be a joke? He looks cute in his onesies, in any case.
But that's kind of exactly my point - why would they want their audience to know about the extremely specific type of porn they watch when they're so fiercely private about almost everything else!VengefulBlue wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:42 pmyeah, this last bit. most of the time when sometime says they're a furry, they're just saying they like furry porn. i imagine it would be the same with macro stuff. neither 'kink' is easy to make real in the bedroom, so i'd say they're telling us about their porn habits more than anything.Kimship wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:34 pmI don't think the micro/macrophilia thing is likely an actual kink. My guess is that Phil stumbled across some one day and fell into a fascination hole saw more than he needed and now it pops into his head at inopportune moments. That's how his conversations about it reads to me, at leastblackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 pm re the furry/macrophilia stuff - do you guys think they're really 'trying to let us know' that those are their real kinks?
*snip*
But then on the other hand, the jokes have been going on a long time now and Dan, particularly, is so committed to the furry 'bit' that I'm unsure!
Now, most furries don't consider actually being a furry a "kink", it's a bit deeper than that? It can be a kink, but isn't necessarily a kink. And I do think it plausible that Dan might have some furry tendencies, but it might also just be a joke? He looks cute in his onesies, in any case.
I agree that it's strange considering we know basically nothing about them. And that might also be the reason I recently wrote about feeling a bit uncomfortable regarding all these sexual comments? I don't feel like I am "close" with them since I know nothing personal about them and for that, it's odd to be told about kinks that they might or might not have almost every video. Maybe I am just a TMI kinda person.blackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:49 pmBut that's kind of exactly my point - why would they want their audience to know about the extremely specific type of porn they watch when they're so fiercely private about almost everything else!VengefulBlue wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:42 pmyeah, this last bit. most of the time when sometime says they're a furry, they're just saying they like furry porn. i imagine it would be the same with macro stuff. neither 'kink' is easy to make real in the bedroom, so i'd say they're telling us about their porn habits more than anything.
See, I have the opposite experience: that when people say they're "a furry", they're distinguishing themselves from people who just look at furry porn. Many furries also look at furry porn, but that's not the thing that makes them "a furry", their desire to be/dress up as an anthropomorphic animal is.VengefulBlue wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:42 pmyeah, this last bit. most of the time when sometime says they're a furry, they're just saying they like furry porn. i imagine it would be the same with macro stuff. neither 'kink' is easy to make real in the bedroom, so i'd say they're telling us about their porn habits more than anything.Kimship wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:34 pmI don't think the micro/macrophilia thing is likely an actual kink. My guess is that Phil stumbled across some one day and fell into a fascination hole saw more than he needed and now it pops into his head at inopportune moments. That's how his conversations about it reads to me, at leastblackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:18 pm re the furry/macrophilia stuff - do you guys think they're really 'trying to let us know' that those are their real kinks?
*snip*
But then on the other hand, the jokes have been going on a long time now and Dan, particularly, is so committed to the furry 'bit' that I'm unsure!
Now, most furries don't consider actually being a furry a "kink", it's a bit deeper than that? It can be a kink, but isn't necessarily a kink. And I do think it plausible that Dan might have some furry tendencies, but it might also just be a joke? He looks cute in his onesies, in any case.
I think all of this is somewhat part of their "accidentally sexual" brand of humor, and to give the fans something to meme. Dan's go to is furries and scalies and before microphilia Phil kept alluding to m-preg. I think they've stepped it up a notch because of the tour, maybe it's the type of jokes they will do and they're preparing for it.blackdenim wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:49 pmBut that's kind of exactly my point - why would they want their audience to know about the extremely specific type of porn they watch when they're so fiercely private about almost everything else!
This is where I am with the macrophilia talk. That's exactly the type of weird thing that I can picture someone stumbling across and just being fascinated at its existence. I've certainly done that with plenty of things because the world is wide and weird, and as long as no one is being (non-consensually) hurt, then it's just so interesting.alittledizzy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:47 pm But the furry thing is also more than just a porn kink, and we all know Dan is into his internet subcultures. On the other hand, I think Phil's macrophilia thing could just be a fascination with it as a concept, not necessarily something he gets off to.
omg same I was actually gonna comment the same thing ! To be extra and over analyse the whole thing, I thought it was so cute how he's not even saying that he needs Phil in his life or something like that, like nope that's a given; what he needs is someone who still finds Phil weird. That comment felt so sweet to me and so revealing of how D&P's life is well, one singular life and how much Phil's presence is like a given to Dan.malday wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:32 pm I re-watched the video and one of my favorite overlooked moments is at 1:38 when Sophie genuinely laughs at Phil's fish food eating comment (and Phil does a little laugh too) and Dan says: "I like that someone is still surprised by how weird Phil is, i need that in my life".
I though it was a very sweet moment.
It's even cuter if you imagine big Phil still existing and being very excited over his tiny counterpart, and big Phil walking into the room to catch his tiny version deep in conversation with Dan or like, curled up in Dan's hair while he and Dan nap together.AroboticPhil wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:01 pmSidenote : after watching the video a few times and reading Dan's comments etc, am I the only one who got strangely attached to tiny Phil ? I picture him just living his smol life, cutting cardboard for PJ, eating cereal, having a weird ambiguous relationship tension with Dan and I'm sad he doesn't actually exist irl (kinda like Dil)(except I like Dil way less). I just feel like this universe would be way funnier if everything was the same except tiny Phil is a thing and nobody ever questions it
Nice. Though it does make me wonder what they would do on his channel. Hopefully it will be a fun collab.DatCog wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:01 pm Just noticed PJ’s latest instastory post and it looks like a collab on his channel is coming tomorrow!![]()
cough cough i need a fanfic about that cough coughalittledizzy wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:28 pmIt's even cuter if you imagine big Phil still existing and being very excited over his tiny counterpart, and big Phil walking into the room to catch his tiny version deep in conversation with Dan or like, curled up in Dan's hair while he and Dan nap together.AroboticPhil wrote: Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:01 pmSidenote : after watching the video a few times and reading Dan's comments etc, am I the only one who got strangely attached to tiny Phil ? I picture him just living his smol life, cutting cardboard for PJ, eating cereal, having a weird ambiguous relationship tension with Dan and I'm sad he doesn't actually exist irl (kinda like Dil)(except I like Dil way less). I just feel like this universe would be way funnier if everything was the same except tiny Phil is a thing and nobody ever questions it