FakeTicia wrote: If this is not photoshopped, I'M SHOOK (like the youngsters say).
x & x




+1pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.
+2 Phannie Troll, fo sho!malday wrote:+1pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.
Yeah... Im thinking this makes the most sense.pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.
that's the main part that gets me in this lol like if it was just a "this is the most fun i've ever had" review from the same restaurant they went to in hong kong, i would have dismissed it in seconds. but why would someone leave a fake review in thailand with that specific phrase (somewhere we have no reason to believe they were) and then another review celebrating the engagement in hong kong at the same restaurant dan and phil were at on the same night? idkJenny wrote:Yeah... Im thinking this makes the most sense.pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.
But, why would a phan account say they got engaged at the wrong restaurant? lol
Yeah, I also want to know how the review got onto phan-twitter. If it's fake I can see how it would be easy to make the fake phil account and then post it on your phan-account, but why are we seeing it now, 4 months later? Idk, it obviously seems fishy, but there's also a little bit of hope in thereisabella wrote:that's the main part that gets me in this lol like if it was just a "this is the most fun i've ever had" review from the same restaurant they went to in hong kong, i would have dismissed it in seconds. but why would someone leave a fake review in thailand with that specific phrase (somewhere we have no reason to believe they were) and then another review celebrating the engagement in hong kong at the same restaurant dan and phil were at on the same night? idkJenny wrote:Yeah... Im thinking this makes the most sense.pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.
But, why would a phan account say they got engaged at the wrong restaurant? lol


Oh I have no doubt that it's potentially a troll, or edited certain parts to make it look shady.isabella wrote:i know the phandom is well-versed in editing posts online haha but to be fair, in this case, the reviews are all real. you can see them for yourself on the trip advisor profile of that user. the only edited part of this is that the engaged review was from hong kong, because it was in bangkok instead. i'm playing devil's advocate here because while it would be a dumb thing for deppy to do, there's just enough reasonable doubt that a phandom troll could have pulled this off or would have even tried.

You've clearly never taken a look at 2008/2009 Phil's twitter. Oh buddy, the guy has atrocious spelling.Lain wrote:@ sinnamonrollphil - but do you really think Phil is capable of such abysmal spelling and grammar?![]()
There are many more errors in the full reviews, as well.
yeah absolutely that's why all of the phandom's "proof" is such a mess lolmelon lord wrote:Oh I have no doubt that it's potentially a troll, or edited certain parts to make it look shady.I'm just reminding that screenshots are unfortunately very misleading nowadays. Which is sad because it reduces the implied validity of a screenshot. If your very receipt is easily modified to twist the truth then what do you have left to back it up?
+3Philena wrote:+2 Phannie Troll, fo sho!malday wrote:+1pearshaped34 wrote:As if Phil would seriously be on tripadvisor making unsubtle phan references and confirming an engagement between him and Dan in reviews of places they posted pictures of on twitter while visiting. That is so clearly a fake phannie account.![]()

I agree with this as well. I think when people were replying they were replying to the portion accusing dan of being narcisstic because he doesn't want to interact with people. That, in my perception of dan, is more of a social anxiety coping mechanism then him thinking I himself above others. Do I think dan is atleast somewhat narcisstic? Yea I do. He tend to think of himself highly sometimes, especially in terms of music taste, fashion, being socially aware etc, and really enjoys and embraces the attention he gets. I saw this more when seeing them live, while Phil would step a little back in the screaming and applause, Dan would step forward and encourage it. That being said, he's grown a lot and I feel like he's honestly become less obsessed with validation from peers and fans and has become comfortable in his current behavior.Catallena wrote:Ignoring the TripAdvisor review troll discussion for a bit, I'm gonna go back to Dan being or not being narcissistic for a real quick second because of you are teeny bit hypocritical about this tbh![]()
Suffering from social anxiety doesn't mean that Dan can't perform, do public speaking, be loud etc. You're all right about that, I have experience with that myself (major social anxiety but don't have too much trouble with public speaking as long as I've rehearsed my stuff and got consistently high grades for it throughout school). But you can't completely turn around and then say that Dan's behavior can't be narcissism because he suffers from social anxiety. Those things can very much go hand in hand, socially anxious people can even have narcissistic personality disorder (which I don't think Dan has, just proving a point here) and in my opinion there are ways in which the two are quite similar; when you want to be really simple about it without any nuance you could say that both are an obsession with what people think of you. There's more differences of course, but I think that similarity is really important to keep in mind sometimes.
Having narcissist traits doesn't need to mean you're a terrible self absorbed person who doesn't care about others but only about themselves. I think YouTubers are all a bit narcissistic... you have to be at least a little bit of a narcissist do it I think. Looking at your face and listen to your voice for hours while editing and then putting it out there... I don't know if Dan's anti social behavior has anything to do with a narcissistic personality, but I wouldn't rule it out so quickly as is done here. If Dan not liking social situations equals social anxiety why can't him loving attention equal narcissism? Because people think of the latter as something negative?
