(phew he didn't. That was an emotional few seconds.)
(Edit: also legit thought he was going to get rid of the fox sweater. I would seriously have rioted. I apparently have strong feelings about that sweater)
(Edit 2: HI DAN )
Is it possible to purchase charity clothes? If he give the fox jumper to charity, I will ask my friends to buy that for me. (I am half joking but if he give the owl jumper away I'll be 100% serious.)The_Blonde wrote:Noo don't get rid of the jellyfish t-shirt![]()
(phew he didn't. That was an emotional few seconds.)
(Edit: also legit thought he was going to get rid of the fox sweater. I would seriously have rioted. I apparently have strong feelings about that sweater)
(Edit 2: HI DAN )
Ohmigod I would hunt the fox jumper down - like in a walking around every charity shop in London sort of way. I totally support doing the same for the owl jumperDiyes_Celine wrote: Is it possible to purchase charity clothes? If he give the fox jumper to charity, I will ask my friends to buy that for me. (I am half joking but if he give the owl jumper away I'll be 100% serious.)
[offtopic]I really hope they don't have meanings because I have really weird dreams, EVERY night. What does that say about me? :wtf:[/offtopic]Moonbeamsonthepath wrote:I'm not saying that dreams definitely show our true feelings, but for those who believe in those kinds of things and think that Phan are slowly coming out, Dan's dream was pretty telling, wasn't it?
(or do you think he only said that as a joke or something?)
Yeah I was really happy that he talked about this and liked what he had to say.nephilimcat wrote: Edit: Yes, Phil, thank you!!! You don't need straight teeth, it's so good to hear him say something like that Comments like this always make me happy, and he is right, it adds character.


^Best part of the ls. Unfortunately the sound and video are unsynchronized in the yotube version at that point.alittledizzy wrote: Dan with a dream about Evan Peters. Phil's lemon dream, and Dan sexualizing it and Phil chastising him. The expression Phil had at that point - I need the youtube version up so I can go watch it but in my timestamp notes all I wrote was "Phil's face omg."

My thoughts exactly! It's not that I care about ~proper~ games more than their interactions with each other 'cause I definitely don't; for me gaming consists of wasting away an afternoon on the original Rollercoaster Tycoon. But there's literally nothing about the horse game except for the absurdity which I got over already 5 minutes into the first video. It doesn't give Depz a whole lot to work with either.. their banter is mostly just various shades of 'OMG HOW WEIRD???!!!'. Are 10 episodes of that necessary?iero wrote:i also watch their gaming videos for their interaction rather than the gameplay itself. i do enjoy the lighthearted silly games. however, even though i'm not really interested in the gameplay itself, i much prefer their interactions in 'proper' (not sure how else to put it lol??) games rather than silly flash/app games.
like donkey kong, undertale, katamari, bubble bobble, golf with friends etc are chilled and it brings out more of their personality imo and encourages conversation further than 'oh my god!!' rather than the predictable sameold reactions in flash/app games. i believe a lot of these games rely on being weird and shocking but i'm desensitised to all of that so i just find the horse sim etc boring. this is all personal preference tho i guess, there's going to be people who prefer the opposite to me.
though i reallyyy enjoy the games that get them questioning stuff like press the button, google feud, quick draw, buzz and who wants to be a millionaire.
Then of course I woke up at that moment when I pressed fav@probz_a_spammy_troll_idk: do you like boys or girls?
@danisnotonfire: cant even decide (*can't remember what's inside the bracket though*)
I thought that was a bit odd too, but then when Dan stood up to leave you saw his legs and I'm fairly certain he was only wearing underpants. I assume he was just trying not to show that when he first sat down. Which of course raises the all important questions: was he wandering around the house in only underwear and a blanket? Does he often go on live shows without proper clothing?flarequake wrote:Loved the liveshow, tbh preferred Phil alone, Dan in the blanket was a bit odd, they looked so disconnected with him on the floor all smothered and Phil up on the sofa.
SHAZAMalittledizzy wrote:17:05 D: "I feel like this is gonna keep escalating... comedically, and romantically." new motto of DAPG?

I'm looking forward to the results of this weekend too, loving this busier uploading schedule.vortexofphan wrote:I thought that was a bit odd too, but then when Dan stood up to leave you saw his legs and I'm fairly certain he was only wearing underpants. I assume he was just trying not to show that when he first sat down. Which of course raises the all important questions: was he wandering around the house in only underwear and a blanket? Does he often go on live shows without proper clothing?flarequake wrote:Loved the liveshow, tbh preferred Phil alone, Dan in the blanket was a bit odd, they looked so disconnected with him on the floor all smothered and Phil up on the sofa.![]()
I enjoyed the liveshow. It was happy and Phil. The stay or go for his clothing was weirdly enjoyable for me. I didn't think I cared about his wardrobe that much, but apparently I do. It's nice that they're both working on new videos!
Me too, he's definitely wearing sweatpants (or as an Australian, I guess I should say 'trackie-dakks'). That was without a doubt his arm, not his bare leg that he shows.iero wrote:hm to me it looks like he was wearing a black tshirt and his grey sweatpants