As missemma said, you're welcome to just screencap the info and block out any identifying information.Kathrynxjane wrote:The problem is that it is public knowledge and if you know where to look, it is easy to find. But it does say what their address on other forms is so I wouldn't be comfortable posting it on a public forum anyway.
Same, but at least he can afford it.Ticia wrote:I will never accept Dan throwing his money away on $800 fugly hoodies though.SquishPhan wrote:Those boys are making serious bank, and I'm weirdly proud of that.
Honestly I don't think it's bad. Although I'm pretty sure most of the phandom (at least) suspects that they are rich, there are still some people who think they are selling books and stuff because they really need the money. Not saying they are greedy sellouts just because they are already loaded but it's good to put things in perspective.danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
In summary: Dan and Phil be minted.majitzu wrote:Between me not knowing the english words and my poor knowledge about contability I don't understand anything xD
danisnotonphil The 'should we' aspect was already discussed, and decisions reached about what to include and what not to include.danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
sorry momdanisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
I'll stick to 'Top 10 Richest Youtubers' articles next time.Phil Lester wrote:"I'll rub myself in a mango before I eat a mango."
danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
If i said the site where you can get the information with their address and address of their accountant, then you have a right to be pissed. I didn't give any indication of how I got that information or their company number.danisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
These are corporate financial details, not personal financial details. I understand that when it comes to Dan and Phil it might seem too personal since we consider them people not companies, but this information is still about their corporations - and corporate financial records are public and available to anyone.danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
You do you, but you can't decide for me what is crossing the line and what isn't, I'll decide that for myself. I find these kind of things interesting, so will discuss them, you are not going to stop that.danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
pal, friend, that information is p u b l i c and about c o m p a n i e s, it's there to be consulted at will, by everyone, and every fucking company has it, we don't need their fucking permission, we have the government'sdanisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
Dan Howell wrote:'[someone] just sent me a message saying 'Phil'..... same'
Well, the info will be public next year! And I'm sure it will be A LOT. Tour + books + documentaries. I can't even imagine a number.SquishPhan wrote:You do you, but you can't decide for me what is crossing the line and what isn't, I'll decide that for myself. I find these kind of things interesting, so will discuss them, you are not going to stop that.danisnotonphil wrote:Whether the info is public you're posting it somewhere else than where it's supposed to be at, without their knowledge and without their permission. It didn't matter if you guys decided it was ok to post any of it, that is not info yours to decide anything about. It is wrong, this shouldn't have been posted at all and it shouldn't even had to be "discussed" in the first place. This is disrespectful but it seems respect means little when it comes to satisfying your curiosity about other people's personal details.
And before anyone suggests I leave or look away, I won't. While the thread is chill I'm gonna stay chill but when you cross a line I will point it out.
I'm really curious how much they have made from the tour, I bet it's quite a lot.
While I get your point, you need to chill. It's not like someone posted their personal bank details. It's the financial statements from their private companies. And next time, you might have better luck if you didn't express your opinion in such an aggressive tonedanisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
i agree with the person saying this wrong seeing as its illegal to post such documents without proper authority from the bank or the ppl in connection to said papers (im getting a law degree)anathema wrote:While I get your point, you need to chill. It's not like someone posted their personal bank details. It's the financial statements from their private companies. And next time, you might have better luck if you didn't express your opinion in such an aggressive tonedanisnotonphil wrote:I don't agree with what just happened here. What's the limit? Regardless of how public or not such information is, it's not a matter of can you post it but should you and the answer is clearly you should not. If they were ok with us knowing how much they have in the bank they'd just talk about it. This is wrong and you all know it.
