I think my fave part of the vid was the #vasegate sass.
That, and that he didn't go the amsr route with the slime. (Still haven't watched that video, still not going to. fite me.)
Conductor, I'd like one train ticket please.sparkle wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:26 pm Hey guys, I have an alternative to the moving train theory. Like a serious alternative. This has literally taken me about 2 hours to write.
Basically - I've been lurking on various tumblrs and seen a lot of people noticing that there are things that are different, something is different. A logical conclusion is moving - but I had a thought about an alternative (thank you thephandommenace for being a good sounding board for my insomniac ideas). What if, what they're building to isn't a 'we're moving again lol' but a 'we're together/committed af', and why the two don't have to be mutually exclusive this time. I know this argument is had about every three days so I'm gonna put it under a spoiler, but just hear me out.
Basically, the crux of this falls to a few things that have happened in the past month and the last few videos in general. And a few things we know about their upload schedule during the end of the year. Warning, this is long ass post. But is possibly the most beautiful theory I’ve ever made. This is also all based on the idea that they show us deliberate things so things aren't a shock to us.
Grab your tinfoil because I'm actually really proud of this one![]()
Nah. I'm sorry, but taking every instance of them indicating one thing ('I'm Phil and this is my room') as a ruse intended to make the audience not buy it and instead "look harder" is creepy. If something doesn't fit into the narrative you want to see, it's probably just because it doesn't fit and not because they're doing some insanely backwards and complicated reverse psychology game trying to provoke people into disregarding their line of privacy. Do they drop hints about things? Yes. But what you've described is a bit much. Moving? Sure. Professing their undying non-platonic love to each other in the next pinof? Nah.sparkle wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:26 pm Grab your tinfoil because I'm actually really proud of this one![]()
I mean, I would love for this to be true, but I think PINOF 9 is a bit soon. I also wasn't here for the original move but I've read through enough old forums to know that they were dropping hints for a while and even if they've been dropping hints for a confirmation lately, it would still be a bit abrupt to turn PINOF 9 into a "hey, we're together" announcement. I'm predicting PINOF 9 will just be in that tiny, cramped area and they'll act like there's enough space in there. I agree with fancybum that the sleepless night video wasn't really saying to look harder. I think that video was just Dan and Phil trying to tell their audience to stop with the theories (though I'm not quite sure why Dan had his liveshow in the moon room). I do believe that they're getting closer and closer to a confirmation, but something that confirms the biggest mystery of their entire brand is going to take a very long time.sparkle wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:26 pm Hey guys, I have an alternative to the moving train theory. Like a serious alternative. This has literally taken me about 2 hours to write.
Basically - I've been lurking on various tumblrs and seen a lot of people noticing that there are things that are different, something is different. A logical conclusion is moving - but I had a thought about an alternative (thank you thephandommenace for being a good sounding board for my insomniac ideas). What if, what they're building to isn't a 'we're moving again lol' but a 'we're together/committed af', and why the two don't have to be mutually exclusive this time. I know this argument is had about every three days so I'm gonna put it under a spoiler, but just hear me out.
Basically, the crux of this falls to a few things that have happened in the past month and the last few videos in general. And a few things we know about their upload schedule during the end of the year. Warning, this is long ass post. But is possibly the most beautiful theory I’ve ever made. This is also all based on the idea that they show us deliberate things so things aren't a shock to us.
Grab your tinfoil because I'm actually really proud of this one![]()
[Offtopic]I'm probably not the most informed person on this topic so correct me if I'm wrong but I think fanservice is broader? Shipbaiting is purely shipbaiting but fanservice can include shipbaiting as well as anything that the audience really wants to see. For example, I think Dan painting his nails probably could have counted as fanservice but definitely not shipbaiting.[/Offtopic]Light02 wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:22 pm [Offtopic]I was wondering about something and decided to ask you guys. What's the difference between shipbaiting and fanservice? I get the difference between queerbaiting and the other two. Also if you answer my question I might not be able to respond back because I'm not going to have an internet connection very often in the next couple of months.[/Offtopic]
That's a nice roundup of clues.sparkle wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:26 pm Grab your tinfoil because I'm actually really proud of this one![]()


[Offtopic]I know you've chose the brownies LtrllySusan, but I made the Pumpkin Spice Pumpkin Cookies and they were amazing. Continuing with my British vs American baking observations, when I translated Dan's recipe back into American, I found he had doubled the spices, which was a good move (I think I literally found the same recipe but with half the spice).lurker wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:35 ami made the pspcs last year and they came out fine. my only complaint is that i had to check like five stores in order to buy molasses and now own a gigantic jar of it.LtrllySusan wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:06 am [Offtopic]I really feel like baking today; has anyone here tried using the Halloween baking recipes and replicated them (more) successfully? I'm especially considering the brownie (minus graveyard) or the Pumpkin cookies. [/Offtopic]![]()
(I just want to sneak in here and say that I don't think his Sleepless Night video was any more of a mistake than the previous ones because it was the exact same thing. Any backlash it got or any negative feelings about it (beyond people just finding it derivative or boring or whatever which is fair enough) not living up to certain ~expectations is all on the audience for having unreasonable expectations of their own making)autumnhearth wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 3:38 pm Some interesting points I agree with sparkle, mainly getting us used to commitment. But like fancybum I also feel like A Hungry Sleepness Night With Phil was neither damage control nor hints, it was just a big mistake of a video imo.
Freedom I suppose. If they are in a relationship, they probably have to cut stuff out and not do certain things in public. Basically, they could act like a normal couple.fancybum wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:00 pm Genuine question: what in the world would they gain from making their relationship public (in an overt "ok here's the truth internet" way rather than "we're existing as we are, make of it what you will" way- the overt one for some reason being the focus of people's theories lately)? I know people just want to Know, but what exactly gives off the impression that D&P themselves want to open that door to the entire flipping internet after years of very plainly saying that's not what they want their content to focus on in any way? "Well they'll still make the same content and act the same on camera" - yeah well then why would they bother changing their public relationship definition then? There's nothing to gain. Apart from the frenzied attention any 'coming outs' attract, which is not at all the kind of attention they seem like they'd be comfortable with.
Ok what does that specifically mean beyond how they already act? They're not going to suddenly have the urge to do the chapstick challenge or do the boyfriend tag or basically any amount of PDA. I just feel like people are projecting their own desires of what they want to see D&P do onto what they think D&P themselves want to do, ignoring what they've actually said on the subject. More 'freedom' to relax or whatever (more than they already have..?) for the ~20mins of their day they film to put online every few days/weeks doesn't seem worth the cost of what they'd be giving up.archived wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:16 pmFreedom I suppose. If they are in a relationship, they probably have to cut stuff out and not do certain things in public. Basically, they could act like a normal couple.fancybum wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:00 pm Genuine question: what in the world would they gain from making their relationship public (in an overt "ok here's the truth internet" way rather than "we're existing as we are, make of it what you will" way- the overt one for some reason being the focus of people's theories lately)? I know people just want to Know, but what exactly gives off the impression that D&P themselves want to open that door to the entire flipping internet after years of very plainly saying that's not what they want their content to focus on in any way? "Well they'll still make the same content and act the same on camera" - yeah well then why would they bother changing their public relationship definition then? There's nothing to gain. Apart from the frenzied attention any 'coming outs' attract, which is not at all the kind of attention they seem like they'd be comfortable with.
Yes!! I really am curious about how much they talk about and how much discussion goes into decisions like that? Like I love it but why now? When I noticed that I also looked at Phils listed channels and found the SMOSH and Duncan but not Mimei curious.AroboticPhil wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:40 amAgreed, I also love that he's added Phil in his listed channels (only one there with DAPG and dini) and been replying to him non-stop, like he also posted his twitter reply about clothes being full of glitter in the comments on youtube lmao that's dedication.FandomLurker wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 7:44 amDan has been all up in his twitter and Phil could not be bothered and I am LIVING for Dan's twitter interactions with Phil.Marika wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 5:59 am
Also, what's up with Dan, replying to almost every tweet from Phil lately? I'm not used to that!![]()
But I love it, somehow seems like they feel safe interacting/showing affection in general lately![]()
It's just funny that even on the internet (like the one place where you can literally talk to anyone) and on top of already being in their little bubble irl, Dan somehow still chooses to almost only interact with Phil![]()
Tbh in a low-key way I have kinda always sensed that about their relationship stuff and personal lives. Phil in general has more censored and shorter live shows, shares less, and is less touchy feely. I kinda get that sense about interactions with others too. I think that it fits the brands for Dan to be less comfortable in social situations or maybe he is just more comfortable talking about it so its easy to project it on him that he has the issue? But Phil tends to do less with others he does not really know and things during their radio show or live things where Dan is made out to be jealous or talk to much or other things might just come out of a place of Phil doesn't want to or is nervous so he steps up. What comes to mind is his LS with all the you tubers a few years ago or his collabs or the dancing thing they did live where Dan just gets inbetween Phil and the girl? or of course asking Phil if he want to talk before CAN PHIL EXPRESS AN OPINION.LtrllySusan wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:50 pm Something I wanna throw into the "agenda to come out" discussion - this is just a feeling and probably amplified by confirmation bias, but to me it seems like Dan is more comfortable with the new agenda than Phil.
It was Dan who showed the moonroom, it was Phil who stuck with the Sleepless Night plan. It was Dan who mentioned foreverhome, who talked about #thatweekinmarch, but it was Phil who seemed uncomfortable telling the leg bruise story. It was also Dan who admitted to "planting seeds", but then there's Phil with his "we are not moving" LS camera angle.
I am not sure what this means, maybe mastermind sparkle can make something of it. It was just something that stood out to me after I saw the bruise discussion on the gaming LS and then reconsidered the last months.
Disclaimer: I am only talking about their online personas, so this has nothing to do with their actual relationship but rather the display of it.
Tbh in a low-key way I have kinda always sensed that about their relationship stuff and personal lives. Phil in general has more censored and shorter live shows, shares less, and is less touchy feely. I kinda get that sense about interactions with others too. I think that it fits the brands for Dan to be less comfortable in social situations or maybe he is just more comfortable talking about it so its easy to project it on him that he has the issue? But Phil tends to do less with others he does not really know and things during their radio show or live things where Dan is made out to be jealous or talk to much or other things might just come out of a place of Phil doesn't want to or is nervous so he steps up. What comes to mind is his LS with all the you tubers a few years ago or his collabs or the dancing thing they did live where Dan just gets inbetween Phil and the girl? or of course asking Phil if he want to talk before CAN PHIL EXPRESS AN OPINION.LtrllySusan wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:50 pm Something I wanna throw into the "agenda to come out" discussion - this is just a feeling and probably amplified by confirmation bias, but to me it seems like Dan is more comfortable with the new agenda than Phil.
It was Dan who showed the moonroom, it was Phil who stuck with the Sleepless Night plan. It was Dan who mentioned foreverhome, who talked about #thatweekinmarch, but it was Phil who seemed uncomfortable telling the leg bruise story. It was also Dan who admitted to "planting seeds", but then there's Phil with his "we are not moving" LS camera angle.
I am not sure what this means, maybe mastermind sparkle can make something of it. It was just something that stood out to me after I saw the bruise discussion on the gaming LS and then reconsidered the last months.
Disclaimer: I am only talking about their online personas, so this has nothing to do with their actual relationship but rather the display of it.
I think it's because Phil doesn't care so much about what other people think of him/his interests. Like Dan wants to be understood, he wants to explain why he likes the things he likes (hello pretentious music reviews) and wants people to know things about him with or without having to entirely spell it out sometimes (cough cough)- he has a need to share his passions. Phil just wants to make the viewer smile and sell some backpacks. I don't think he's against the trend they've been taking (because the change from gamingmas was noticeable in both of them) but maybe it's just not quite as important to him as it is to Dan.LtrllySusan wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:50 pm Something I wanna throw into the "agenda to come out" discussion - this is just a feeling and probably amplified by confirmation bias, but to me it seems like Dan is more comfortable with the new agenda than Phil.
It was Dan who showed the moonroom, it was Phil who stuck with the Sleepless Night plan. It was Dan who mentioned foreverhome, who talked about #thatweekinmarch, but it was Phil who seemed uncomfortable telling the leg bruise story. It was also Dan who admitted to "planting seeds", but then there's Phil with his "we are not moving" LS camera angle.
I am not sure what this means, maybe mastermind sparkle can make something of it. It was just something that stood out to me after I saw the bruise discussion on the gaming LS and then reconsidered the last months.
Disclaimer: I am only talking about their online personas, so this has nothing to do with their actual relationship but rather the display of it.
[Offtopic]this is just my personal opinion, but I think there's not that much difference, except that maybe ship-baiting is done with a clear intent to bait, sometimes with nothing much to "deliver", and fanservice - to "reward" the fans.Light02 wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 2:22 pm [Offtopic]I was wondering about something and decided to ask you guys. What's the difference between shipbaiting and fanservice? I get the difference between queerbaiting and the other two. Also if you answer my question I might not be able to respond back because I'm not going to have an internet connection very often in the next couple of months.[/Offtopic]

LtrllySusan wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 4:50 pm Something I wanna throw into the "agenda to come out" discussion - this is just a feeling and probably amplified by confirmation bias, but to me it seems like Dan is more comfortable with the new agenda than Phil.
It was Dan who showed the moonroom, it was Phil who stuck with the Sleepless Night plan. It was Dan who mentioned foreverhome, who talked about #thatweekinmarch, but it was Phil who seemed uncomfortable telling the leg bruise story. It was also Dan who admitted to "planting seeds", but then there's Phil with his "we are not moving" LS camera angle.
I am not sure what this means, maybe mastermind sparkle can make something of it. It was just something that stood out to me after I saw the bruise discussion on the gaming LS and then reconsidered the last months.
Disclaimer: I am only talking about their online personas, so this has nothing to do with their actual relationship but rather the display of it.
I loved that line too. It does look like Phil's comfortable enough for the general relaxing they've been doing on certain things, though I think his shorter liveshows are just his preference rather than necessarily due to privacy.coffeepenguin wrote: Sun Sep 03, 2017 5:16 pm I have nothing substantial to add to the possible moving/coming out discussion, but I just need to say, omg fancybum I love you, "Dan wants to be understood / Phil just wants to make the viewer smile and sell some backpacks" is such a perfect summary of their online presence![]()
![]()
I might add this to my signature, if you don't mind